Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] LLVM 11.1.0-rc1 has been tagged

2021-01-18 Thread Dimitry Andric via lldb-dev
On 14 Jan 2021, at 02:46, Tom Stellard via Release-testers 
 wrote:
> 
> LLVM 11.1.0-rc1 has been tagged.  This is a special release with a 
> libclang.so ABI fix to ensure libclang.so remains compatible with LLVM 10 and 
> LLVM 12.  Testers may begin testing and upload binaries.

For 11.1.0 rc1, I have built and tested on both FreeBSD 11 and 12 again.
No additional patches were needed.


Main results on amd64-freebsd11:

  Unsupported:  5122 (11.0.1 final:  5122)
  Passed : 69796 (11.0.1 final: 69797)
  Expectedly Failed  :   246 (11.0.1 final:   246)
  Timed Out  :16 (11.0.1 final:16)
  Failed :   480 (11.0.1 final:   479)
  Unexpectedly Passed: 2 (11.0.1 final: 2)

Test suite results on amd64-freebsd11:

  Passed: 2399 (11.0.1 final: 2399)
  Failed:3 (11.0.1 final:3)


Main results on amd64-freebsd12:

  Unsupported:  5122 (11.0.1 final:  5122)
  Passed : 69794 (11.0.1 final: 69794)
  Expectedly Failed  :   246 (11.0.1 final:   246)
  Timed Out  :16 (11.0.1 final:16)
  Failed :   482 (11.0.1 final:   482)
  Unexpectedly Passed: 2 (11.0.1 final: 2)

Test suite results on amd64-freebsd12:

  Passed: 2399 (11.0.1 final: 2399)
  Failed:3 (11.0.1 final:3)


Main results on i386-freebsd11:

  Unsupported:  3513 (11.0.1 final:  3513)
  Passed : 66675 (11.0.1 final: 66675)
  Expectedly Failed  :   231 (11.0.1 final:   231)
  Timed Out  : 7 (11.0.1 final: 7)
  Failed :   317 (11.0.1 final:   317)
  Unexpectedly Passed: 1 (11.0.1 final: 1)


Main results on i386-freebsd12:

  Unsupported:  3513 (11.0.1 final:  3513)
  Passed : 66670 (11.0.1 final: 66670)
  Expectedly Failed  :   231 (11.0.1 final:   231)
  Timed Out  : 7 (11.0.1 final: 7)
  Failed :   322 (11.0.1 final:   322)
  Unexpectedly Passed: 1 (11.0.1 final: 1)


Uploaded:
SHA256 (clang+llvm-11.1.0-rc1-amd64-unknown-freebsd11.tar.xz) = 
c8970b2950bb45c17bb1e2ae0eab1c89d082a23ffcd0433543f08d3900b11995
SHA256 (clang+llvm-11.1.0-rc1-amd64-unknown-freebsd12.tar.xz) = 
3fd6a11d405c1a671a8685c52acbf5de34e50fb1abb8685b0b61a63d82a5750d
SHA256 (clang+llvm-11.1.0-rc1-i386-unknown-freebsd11.tar.xz) = 
59c0f94d0ebaefcd65ad46ad1e0499ba0dbd617cb3375d47bd509d4f4a968407
SHA256 (clang+llvm-11.1.0-rc1-i386-unknown-freebsd12.tar.xz) = 
4796b3acbd3550c2ca2d058f32f1383c84aef42566fe0acd7b5eb70442f26fbe

-Dimitry



signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
___
lldb-dev mailing list
lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev


[lldb-dev] The SB API documentation migrated to sphinx

2021-01-18 Thread Raphael “Teemperor” Isemann via lldb-dev
Hi all,

some of you might have noticed that over the weekend we migrated the SB API 
documentation over to sphinx: https://lldb.llvm.org/python_api.html

This change will require some (minor) changes to the current workflow:
1. docstrings in the SWIG (*.i) files should be written in reStructuredText. 
[1] has an overview of the reStructuredText syntax.
2. Documenting functions should be done using the sphinx approach [2].
3. You need the sphinx-automodapi plugin to build the API docs. The docs are 
now also built as part of the normal LLDB website (the target name is 
`docs-lldb-html`).

There are still a few things I need to figure out (mostly how to properly 
document the special `__XZY__` functions and our global enum variables), but 
otherwise this website is mostly ready. Let me know if you run into any issues.

The old API documentation is still online but will redirect soon to the new API 
documentation.

A very big thanks to Andrei Lebedev for taking care of doing all the server 
maintenance on the build server!

Cheers,
- Raphael

[1] https://www.sphinx-doc.org/en/master/usage/restructuredtext/basics.html
[2] https://sphinx-rtd-tutorial.readthedocs.io/en/latest/docstrings.html
___
lldb-dev mailing list
lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev


Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] LLVM 11.1.0-rc1 has been tagged

2021-01-18 Thread Tom Stellard via lldb-dev

On 1/13/21 5:46 PM, Tom Stellard via Release-testers wrote:

Hi,

LLVM 11.1.0-rc1 has been tagged.  This is a special release with a 
libclang.so ABI fix to ensure libclang.so remains compatible with LLVM 
10 and LLVM 12.  Testers may begin testing and upload binaries.




I was looking at the release/7.x branch and noticed that we added the 
minor version to the soname for the 7.1.0 release.  Should we do the 
same for 11.1.0?  Same question about the symbol versioning for 
libclang.so, should we update the symbol versions to be libclang.so.11.1?


-Tom


Thanks,
Tom

___
Release-testers mailing list
release-test...@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/release-testers


___
lldb-dev mailing list
lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev


Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] LLVM 11.1.0-rc1 has been tagged

2021-01-18 Thread Tom Stellard via lldb-dev

On 1/18/21 2:54 PM, Tom Stellard wrote:

On 1/13/21 5:46 PM, Tom Stellard via Release-testers wrote:

Hi,

LLVM 11.1.0-rc1 has been tagged.  This is a special release with a 
libclang.so ABI fix to ensure libclang.so remains compatible with LLVM 
10 and LLVM 12.  Testers may begin testing and upload binaries.




I was looking at the release/7.x branch and noticed that we added the 
minor version to the soname for the 7.1.0 release.  Should we do the 
same for 11.1.0?  Same question about the symbol versioning for 
libclang.so, should we update the symbol versions to be libclang.so.11.1?




I've sent a patch for this: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94941

-Tom


-Tom


Thanks,
Tom

___
Release-testers mailing list
release-test...@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/release-testers




___
lldb-dev mailing list
lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev