[lldb-dev] [Bug 46397] Wrong backtrace infromation at Og
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46397 Jan Kratochvil changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW |RESOLVED Fixed By Commit(s)||5ed8765e2f007e56a34e3aa0ab0 ||1f65c5aaa7e27 Assignee|lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org |lab...@google.com --- Comment #7 from Jan Kratochvil --- [lldb/Unwind] Use eh_frame plan directly when it doesn't need to be augmented https://reviews.llvm.org/D82378 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
[lldb-dev] [Bug 46398] Wrong backtrace infromation at Og
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46398 Jan Kratochvil changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED Assignee|lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org |lab...@google.com Fixed By Commit(s)||5ed8765e2f007e56a34e3aa0ab0 ||1f65c5aaa7e27 --- Comment #2 from Jan Kratochvil --- [lldb/Unwind] Use eh_frame plan directly when it doesn't need to be augmented https://reviews.llvm.org/D82378 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
Re: [lldb-dev] [llvm-dev] 10.0.1-rc2 release has been tagged
On Sat, Jun 27, 2020 at 2:44 AM Tom Stellard via llvm-dev wrote: > > Hi, > > I've tagged the 10.0.1-rc2 release, please test the release and report any > issues. Windows is ready: $ sha1sum LLVM-10.0.1-rc2*.exe 79dd8f3e9e509709aaf3ab0226f1f84ad8d265e1 LLVM-10.0.1-rc2-win32.exe 4b7a4ccab4b6fef1ba85c7035a51207a89c4dd67 LLVM-10.0.1-rc2-win64.exe It was built with the attached batch file (which is based on llvm/utils/release/build_llvm_package.bat). There was one test failure: llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/asm-modifier2.ll That was fixed on trunk, but the fix didn't reach the branch. I've commented on PR46223. build_llvm_1001-rc2._bat_ Description: Binary data ___ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
[lldb-dev] [Bug 46038] Wrong backtrace information at Og
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46038 Jan Kratochvil changed: What|Removed |Added Status|CONFIRMED |RESOLVED Fixed By Commit(s)||5ed8765e2f007e56a34e3aa0ab0 ||1f65c5aaa7e27 Assignee|lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org |lab...@google.com Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #8 from Jan Kratochvil --- [lldb/Unwind] Use eh_frame plan directly when it doesn't need to be augmented https://reviews.llvm.org/D82378 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
[lldb-dev] [Bug 44774] basic_entry_values_x86_64 failing due to compiler changes
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44774 lab...@google.com changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org |lab...@google.com Status|NEW |RESOLVED Fixed By Commit(s)||a5c23179826a6 CC||lab...@google.com Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #2 from lab...@google.com --- Fixed by a5c23179826a6. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
[lldb-dev] [Bug 45546] lldb-unit.Host/_/HostTests::ConnectionFileDescriptorTest.TCPGetURIv6 flaky on harbormaster builds
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45546 lab...@google.com changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed By Commit(s)||18e96a31fe02 Resolution|--- |FIXED Assignee|lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org |lab...@google.com Status|NEW |RESOLVED --- Comment #2 from lab...@google.com --- This should be fixed by 18e96a31fe02. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] 10.0.1-rc2 release has been tagged
On Fri, 2020-06-26 at 17:44 -0700, Tom Stellard via Release-testers wrote: > Hi, > > I've tagged the 10.0.1-rc2 release, please test the release and report any > issues. > So far one regression in LLVM tests, apparently caused by incomplete asm fix backport. FWICS additional backport was requested already: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46223 -- Best regards, Michał Górny signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
