Re: [lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] [8.0.0 Release] rc2 has been tagged

2019-02-12 Thread Diana Picus via lldb-dev
Uploaded ARM & AArch64:
9432315fe814e5edc667467bc1b3ce4817084edc
clang+llvm-8.0.0-rc2-aarch64-linux-gnu.tar.xz
fb7f587de673837c82da47209ec9d9ed72f9b27f
clang+llvm-8.0.0-rc2-armv7a-linux-gnueabihf.tar.xz

Same as before, ARM looks fine but we have a MSan failure on AArch64
(I haven't yet managed to reproduce it outside Jenkins though, I'll
try harder).

Cheers,
Diana

On Mon, 11 Feb 2019 at 17:34, Paweł Sikora via cfe-dev
 wrote:
>
> 
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 8, 2019 at 9:53 AM Paweł Sikora via cfe-dev 
>  wrote:
>>
>> - Oryginalna wiadomość -
>> > Dear testers,
>> >
>> > 8.0.0-rc2 has been tagged from the release_80 branch at r353413.
>>
>> Hi,
>> i've noticed a compile error with rc2 and libc++ (release_80 @svn). looks 
>> similar to https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40559
>> (...)
>> (...)/sysroot-x86_64-linux-gnu/usr/include/c++/v1/type_traits:740:56: error: 
>> _Float16 is not supported on this target
>> template <>  struct __libcpp_is_floating_point<_Float16>: public 
>> true_type {};
>
>
> This is quite odd, because libc++ trunk has no mentions of `_Float16`, and I 
> see none here:
> 
> https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/libcxx/branches/release_80/include/type_traits
>
> oh,  my fault, these headers were from release_70 branch. the 8.0rc2 works 
> fine, sorry for the noise.
>
> regards,
> pawel.
>
> ___
> cfe-dev mailing list
> cfe-...@lists.llvm.org
> https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev
___
lldb-dev mailing list
lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev


Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] [8.0.0 Release] rc2 has been tagged

2019-02-12 Thread Brian Cain via lldb-dev
Any tips or suggestions on how to isolate or identify this defect?  It
seems non-trivial to bisect this failure.

Hans: presumably this bug should block the 8.0 release?

On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 8:37 AM Brian Cain  wrote:

> rc1 did not exhibit this mismatch.  A repeat of the rc2 build repeated the
> mismatch.  I diff'd the disassembly between phase 2 and phase 3 and the
> difference is the same on both builds.  The difference follows:
>
> # diff x86isel_p{2,3}.s
> 2c2
> <
> Phase2/Release/llvmCore-8.0.0-rc2.obj/lib/Target/X86/CMakeFiles/LLVMX86CodeGen.dir/X86ISelLowering.cpp.o:
>file format elf64-x86-64
> ---
> >
> Phase3/Release/llvmCore-8.0.0-rc2.obj/lib/Target/X86/CMakeFiles/LLVMX86CodeGen.dir/X86ISelLowering.cpp.o:
>file format elf64-x86-64
> 121757c121757
> <  863: 48 8b 84 24 e0 05 00mov0x5e0(%rsp),%rax
> ---
> >  863: 48 8b 84 24 b0 01 00mov0x1b0(%rsp),%rax
> 121759c121759
> <  86b: 48 33 84 24 b0 01 00xor0x1b0(%rsp),%rax
> ---
> >  86b: 48 33 84 24 e0 05 00xor0x5e0(%rsp),%rax
> 121761,121762c121761,121762
> <  873: 8b 8c 24 e8 05 00 00mov0x5e8(%rsp),%ecx
> <  87a: 33 8c 24 b8 01 00 00xor0x1b8(%rsp),%ecx
> ---
> >  873: 8b 8c 24 b8 01 00 00mov0x1b8(%rsp),%ecx
> >  87a: 33 8c 24 e8 05 00 00xor0x5e8(%rsp),%ecx
>
>
> On Sat, Feb 9, 2019 at 9:54 AM Brian Cain  wrote:
>
>> rc2 build on Ubuntu 16.04 saw a stage 2/3 mismatch on
>> X86IselLowering.cpp.o -- I didn't try to build rc1 for 16.04 but I can try
>> it now to see if it's there too.
>>
>> I can pass along logs if anyone wants to investigate.
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 7, 2019 at 9:41 AM Hans Wennborg via Release-testers <
>> release-test...@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Dear testers,
>>>
>>> 8.0.0-rc2 has been tagged from the release_80 branch at r353413.
>>>
>>> Please run the test script, share your results, and upload binaries.
>>>
>>> I'll get the source tarballs and docs published as soon as possible,
>>> and binaries as they become available.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Hans
>>> ___
>>> Release-testers mailing list
>>> release-test...@lists.llvm.org
>>> https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/release-testers
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> -Brian
>


-- 
-Brian
___
lldb-dev mailing list
lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev