Okay, thanks for weighing in, Mehdi.
I'll reach out to the LLVM side and see how they handle the builds, then
report back on options there.
-Todd
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 9:18 AM, Mehdi Amini wrote:
>
> On Nov 10, 2016, at 9:14 AM, Todd Fiala via lldb-dev <
> lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I just took a look at our page here:
>
> http://lldb.llvm.org/download.html
>
> The LLDB Releases section seems pretty out of date. It seems like we
> could correct that via a few different ways:
>
> * Remove the LLDB Releases section - this would eliminate the appearance
> of us keeping it up to date (i.e. match what looks to be reality).
>
> * Start keeping it up to date, at least for the groups that are in fact
> making occasional builds available.
>
> * Coordinate with the LLVM folks that do the LLVM binaries, figure out
> what we need to do to make that happen, and maybe have this page link to
> the LLVM downloads page.
>
>
> My 2 cents: I’d like to see lldb getting more of a first class citizen
> (alongside with Clang) in the LLVM project. So having it as part of the
> LLVM release makes sense to me, at least on the medium term.
>
> Best,
>
> —
> Mehdi
>
>
>
>
>
> * For those buildbots that do produce usable packages, we could link from
> here to the build jobs, possibly with a little text on how to make use of
> it.
>
> * Something else?
>
> Any opinions here? Clearly some of those options above imply work by
> some, so getting generating usable images generated still may be on a
> maintainer opt-in basis. I'm just looking to see us clean up the
> communication on this page:
>
> http://lldb.llvm.org/download.html
>
> just as a matter of settings expectations for those who land there.
>
> Thanks for any thoughts on this!
> --
> -Todd
> ___
> lldb-dev mailing list
> lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
>
>
>
--
-Todd
___
lldb-dev mailing list
lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
