Re: [Lldb-commits] [cfe-dev] Upcoming upgrade of LLVM buildbot

2020-10-12 Thread Andrzej Warzynski via lldb-commits
Our Flang-aarch64 buildbots just won't connect to the main Buildbot 
master anymore. I switched them to the staging buildbot master instead 
and it seems fine for now. Is there anything that we can/should tweak at 
our end?


http://lab.llvm.org:8014/#/waterfall?tags=flang

-Andrzej

On 08/10/2020 00:31, Galina Kistanova via cfe-dev wrote:

They are online now - http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/waterfall?tags=sanitizer

AnnotatedCommand has severe design conflict with the new buildbot.
We have changed it to be safe and still do something useful, but it will 
need more love and care.


Please let me know if you have some spare time to work on porting 
AnnotatedCommand.


Thanks

Galina

On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 2:57 PM Vitaly Buka > wrote:


It looks like all sanitizer builder are still offline
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders

On Tue, 6 Oct 2020 at 00:34, Galina Kistanova via cfe-commits
mailto:cfe-comm...@lists.llvm.org>> wrote:

Hello everyone,

The staging buildbot was up and running for 6 days now, and
looks good.

Tomorrow at 12:00 PM PDT we will switch the production buildbot
to the new version.

If you are a bot owner, you do not need to do anything at this
point, unless I'll ask you to help.
The buildbot will go down for a short period of time, and then a
new version will come up and will accept connections from your bots.

Please note that the new version has a bit different URL
structure. You will need to update the bookmarks or scripts if
you have stored direct URLs to inside the buldbot.

We will be watching the production and staging bots and will be
improving zorg for the next week or so.

I will need your feedback about blame e-mails delivery, IRC
reporting issues, and anything you could spot wrong with the new
bot. I  hope the transition will go smoothly and we will handle
issues quickly if any would come up.

After production is good and we have about a week of running
history, I'll ask the bot owners to upgrade buildbots on their
side. Please do not upgrade your buildbots unless I'll ask you
to. We are trying to limit a number of moving parts at this
stage. We will start accepting change to zorg at this point.
Please feel free to talk to me if you will have a special
situation and if you would absolutely have to make changes.

Thanks for your support and help. And please feel free to ask if
you have questions.

Galina


On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 9:35 PM Galina Kistanova
mailto:gkistan...@gmail.com>> wrote:

Hello everyone,

The buildbot upgrade is entering the phase when the results
to become visible.

No change is required at this time on any of the builders.
The bot owners could upgrade the buildbot on build computers
later, at their convenience, as this is not on the critical
path.

We are going to upgrade the staging bot first. Then, once
that is stable and all detected issues are resolved, we will
upgrade the production bot.

I will need some help with testing, and will be asking to
move some of the builders temporarily to the staging. LLVM
buildbot is a piece of critical infrastructure, so more eyes
and hands in making sure it works properly the better.

I'll be posting updates and ETA of particular changes in
this thread.

Please feel free to ask if you have any questions or concerns.

Thanks

Galina

___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-comm...@lists.llvm.org 
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits


___
cfe-dev mailing list
cfe-...@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev


___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits


Re: [Lldb-commits] [llvm-dev] [cfe-dev] Upcoming upgrade of LLVM buildbot

2020-10-12 Thread Andrzej Warzynski via lldb-commits
I switched one of our workers to the main Buildbot and everything seems 
fine #fingers-crossed. I guess that that was a temporary glitch?


We haven't updated our local Buildbot installations - still on 0.8.5. 
Should we update?


-Andrzej

On 09/10/2020 00:44, Galina Kistanova wrote:

Hi Paula,

This error is fine. The buildbot has tested the worker version. 0.8.x 
apparently does not have that method.
The error gets handled gracefully on the server side. At least it seems 
so so far.


That should not prevent your bot from connecting.

Thanks

Galina

On Thu, Oct 8, 2020 at 2:11 PM Paula Askar > wrote:


Hey Andrzej,

What are you seeing in your buildbot logs? Is it this error?
`twisted.spread.flavors.NoSuchMethod: No such method:
remote_getWorkerInfo`

If so, you might want to try updating your buildbot worker.
I updated llvmlibc's to 2.8.4 and that seemed to solve the connection
problem:

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/f60686f35cc89504f3411f49cf16a651a74be6eb

Best,
Paula Askar


On Thu, Oct 8, 2020 at 5:43 AM Andrzej Warzynski via llvm-dev
mailto:llvm-...@lists.llvm.org>> wrote:
 >
 > Our Flang-aarch64 buildbots just won't connect to the main Buildbot
 > master anymore. I switched them to the staging buildbot master
instead
 > and it seems fine for now. Is there anything that we can/should
tweak at
 > our end?
 >
 > http://lab.llvm.org:8014/#/waterfall?tags=flang
 >
 > -Andrzej
 >
 > On 08/10/2020 00:31, Galina Kistanova via cfe-dev wrote:
 > > They are online now -
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/waterfall?tags=sanitizer
 > >
 > > AnnotatedCommand has severe design conflict with the new buildbot.
 > > We have changed it to be safe and still do something useful,
but it will
 > > need more love and care.
 > >
 > > Please let me know if you have some spare time to work on porting
 > > AnnotatedCommand.
 > >
 > > Thanks
 > >
 > > Galina
 > >
 > > On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 2:57 PM Vitaly Buka
mailto:vitalyb...@google.com>
 > > >>
wrote:
 > >
 > >     It looks like all sanitizer builder are still offline
 > > http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders
 > >
 > >     On Tue, 6 Oct 2020 at 00:34, Galina Kistanova via cfe-commits
 > >     mailto:cfe-comm...@lists.llvm.org>
>> wrote:
 > >
 > >         Hello everyone,
 > >
 > >         The staging buildbot was up and running for 6 days now, and
 > >         looks good.
 > >
 > >         Tomorrow at 12:00 PM PDT we will switch the production
buildbot
 > >         to the new version.
 > >
 > >         If you are a bot owner, you do not need to do anything
at this
 > >         point, unless I'll ask you to help.
 > >         The buildbot will go down for a short period of time,
and then a
 > >         new version will come up and will accept connections
from your bots.
 > >
 > >         Please note that the new version has a bit different URL
 > >         structure. You will need to update the bookmarks or
scripts if
 > >         you have stored direct URLs to inside the buldbot.
 > >
 > >         We will be watching the production and staging bots and
will be
 > >         improving zorg for the next week or so.
 > >
 > >         I will need your feedback about blame e-mails delivery, IRC
 > >         reporting issues, and anything you could spot wrong
with the new
 > >         bot. I  hope the transition will go smoothly and we
will handle
 > >         issues quickly if any would come up.
 > >
 > >         After production is good and we have about a week of
running
 > >         history, I'll ask the bot owners to upgrade buildbots
on their
 > >         side. Please do not upgrade your buildbots unless I'll
ask you
 > >         to. We are trying to limit a number of moving parts at this
 > >         stage. We will start accepting change to zorg at this
point.
 > >         Please feel free to talk to me if you will have a special
 > >         situation and if you would absolutely have to make changes.
 > >
 > >         Thanks for your support and help. And please feel free
to ask if
 > >         you have questions.
 > >
 > >         Galina
 > >
 > >
 > >         On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 9:35 PM Galina Kistanova
 > >         mailto:gkistan...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
 > >
 > >             Hello everyone,
 > >
 > >             The buildbot upgrade is entering the phase when the
results
 > >             to become v