Re: [PATCH] Revert "ARC: entry: fix potential EFA clobber when TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE"

2020-11-06 Thread Vineet Gupta
Hi Stable Team,

On 10/19/20 7:19 PM, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> This reverts commit 00fdec98d9881bf5173af09aebd353ab3b9ac729.
> (but only from 5.2 and prior kernels)
> 
> The original commit was a preventive fix based on code-review and was
> auto-picked for stable back-port (for better or worse).
> It was OK for v5.3+ kernels, but turned up needing an implicit change
> 68e5c6f073bcf70 "(ARC: entry: EV_Trap expects r10 (vs. r9) to have
>  exception cause)" merged in v5.3 which itself was not backported.
> So to summarize the stable backport of this patch for v5.2 and prior
> kernels is busted and it won't boot.
> 
> The obvious solution is backport 68e5c6f073bcf70 but that is a pain as
> it doesn't revert cleanly and each of affected kernels (so far v4.19,
> v4.14, v4.9, v4.4) needs a slightly different massaged varaint.
> So the easier fix is to simply revert the backport from 5.2 and prior.
> The issue was not a big deal as it would cause strace to sporadically
> not work correctly.
> 
> Waldemar Brodkorb first reported this when running ARC uClibc regressions
> on latest stable kernels (with offending backport). Once he bisected it,
> the analysis was trivial, so thx to him for this.
> 
> Reported-by: Waldemar Brodkorb 
> Bisected-by: Waldemar Brodkorb 
> Cc: stable  # 5.2 and prior
> Signed-off-by: Vineet Gupta 

Can this revert be please applied to 4.19 and older kernels for the next cycle.

Or is there is a procedural issue given this revert is not in mainline. I've
described the issue in detail above so if there's a better/desirable way of
reverting it from backports, please let me know.

Thx,

> ---
>  arch/arc/kernel/entry.S | 16 +++-
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arc/kernel/entry.S b/arch/arc/kernel/entry.S
> index ea00c8a17f07..60406ec62eb8 100644
> --- a/arch/arc/kernel/entry.S
> +++ b/arch/arc/kernel/entry.S
> @@ -165,6 +165,7 @@ END(EV_Extension)
>  tracesys:
>   ; save EFA in case tracer wants the PC of traced task
>   ; using ERET won't work since next-PC has already committed
> + lr  r12, [efa]
>   GET_CURR_TASK_FIELD_PTR   TASK_THREAD, r11
>   st  r12, [r11, THREAD_FAULT_ADDR]   ; thread.fault_address
>  
> @@ -207,9 +208,15 @@ tracesys_exit:
>  ; Breakpoint TRAP
>  ; -
>  trap_with_param:
> - mov r0, r12 ; EFA in case ptracer/gdb wants stop_pc
> +
> + ; stop_pc info by gdb needs this info
> + lr  r0, [efa]
>   mov r1, sp
>  
> + ; Now that we have read EFA, it is safe to do "fake" rtie
> + ;   and get out of CPU exception mode
> + FAKE_RET_FROM_EXCPN
> +
>   ; Save callee regs in case gdb wants to have a look
>   ; SP will grow up by size of CALLEE Reg-File
>   ; NOTE: clobbers r12
> @@ -236,10 +243,6 @@ ENTRY(EV_Trap)
>  
>   EXCEPTION_PROLOGUE
>  
> - lr  r12, [efa]
> -
> - FAKE_RET_FROM_EXCPN
> -
>   ; TRAP 1   :breakpoints
>   ; Check ECR for trap with arg (PROLOGUE ensures r10 has ECR)
>   bmsk.f 0, r10, 7
> @@ -247,6 +250,9 @@ ENTRY(EV_Trap)
>  
>   ; TRAP  (no param): syscall top level
>  
> + ; First return from Exception to pure K mode (Exception/IRQs renabled)
> + FAKE_RET_FROM_EXCPN
> +
>   ; If syscall tracing ongoing, invoke pre-post-hooks
>   GET_CURR_THR_INFO_FLAGS   r10
>   btst r10, TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE
> 

___
linux-snps-arc mailing list
linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-snps-arc


Re: [GIT PULL] ARC fixes for 5.10-rc3

2020-11-06 Thread pr-tracker-bot
The pull request you sent on Thu, 5 Nov 2020 21:13:08 +:

> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/vgupta/arc.git/ 
> tags/arc-5.10-rc3

has been merged into torvalds/linux.git:
https://git.kernel.org/torvalds/c/4257087e8feb2e6f918eb0773eb1c1a697dd2a39

Thank you!

-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/prtracker.html

___
linux-snps-arc mailing list
linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-snps-arc


Re: [RFC] proc: get_wchan() stack unwind only makes sense for sleeping/non-self tasks

2020-11-06 Thread Andrew Morton
On Thu,  5 Nov 2020 15:11:32 -0800 Vineet Gupta  
wrote:

> Most architectures currently check this in their get_wchan() implementation
> (ARC doesn't hence this patch). However doing this in core code shows
> the semantics better so move the check one level up (eventually remove
> the boiler-plate code from arches)

It would be nice to clean up the arch callees in the same patch, at
least so it doesn't get forgotten about.  Are you prepared to propose
such a change?


___
linux-snps-arc mailing list
linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-snps-arc