Re: modules still have .debug_* (was Re: [PATCH 0/3] ARC unwinder switch to .eh_frame)
Hi Daniel, On Fri, 2016-09-23 at 18:04 -0700, Daniel Mentz wrote: > On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 3:38 AM, Alexey Brodkin > wrote: > > > > On Thu, 2016-09-22 at 15:37 -0700, Daniel Mentz wrote: > > > > > > Sorry, that was a misunderstanding. Buildroot routinely runs the strip > > > command on .ko files before installing them on the target. I was only > > > looking at the .ko files *after* running the strip command. No, the > > > interim patch was not in my tree. > > > > Well are you sure buildroot really touches modules in Linux kernel build > > folder? > > Buildroot just runs a simple "make" command in "output/build/linux-x.y". > > Sorry, that was phrased badly. Buildroot does not touch the modules in > the Linux kernel build folder. Modules are stripped in the target > directory as you described. So every is as expected now for you or there're still thing you don't like? -Alexey ___ linux-snps-arc mailing list linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-snps-arc
Re: modules still have .debug_* (was Re: [PATCH 0/3] ARC unwinder switch to .eh_frame)
On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 5:38 AM, Alexey Brodkin wrote: > On Fri, 2016-09-23 at 18:04 -0700, Daniel Mentz wrote: >> On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 3:38 AM, Alexey Brodkin >> wrote: >> > >> > On Thu, 2016-09-22 at 15:37 -0700, Daniel Mentz wrote: >> > > >> > > Sorry, that was a misunderstanding. Buildroot routinely runs the strip >> > > command on .ko files before installing them on the target. I was only >> > > looking at the .ko files *after* running the strip command. No, the >> > > interim patch was not in my tree. >> > >> > Well are you sure buildroot really touches modules in Linux kernel build >> > folder? >> > Buildroot just runs a simple "make" command in "output/build/linux-x.y". >> >> Sorry, that was phrased badly. Buildroot does not touch the modules in >> the Linux kernel build folder. Modules are stripped in the target >> directory as you described. > > So every is as expected now for you or there're still thing you don't like? Yes, everything works as expected now. Thank you for Synposys' support with this issue. ___ linux-snps-arc mailing list linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-snps-arc
Re: [PATCH] ARC: CONFIG_NODES_SHIFT fix default values
On 09/21/2016 03:51 AM, Noam Camus wrote: > From: Noam Camus > > Seem like values assigned as absolute number and not and > shift value, i.e. should be 0 for one node (2^0) and 1 for > couple of nodes (2^1) > > Signed-off-by: Noam Camus Good catch ! Added to for-next. Thx, -Vineet ___ linux-snps-arc mailing list linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-snps-arc
