Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] 2 patches in gdb: Failure on aarch64
On 2024-07-27 03:34, ci_not...@linaro.org wrote: > Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your > patch(es). Please find some details below. If you have any questions, > please follow up on linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org mailing list, Libera's > #linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain developer on > the usual project channel. > > We appreciate that it might be difficult to find the necessary logs or > reproduce the issue locally. If you can't get what you need from our CI > within minutes, let us know and we will be happy to help. > > In gdb_check master-aarch64 after: > > | 2 patches in gdb > | Patchwork URL: https://patchwork.sourceware.org/patch/94605 > | 9aca4cc6ec5 gdb: pass inferior to gdbarch_update_p > | f3b21ad781e gdb: pass inferior to target_current_description > | ... applied on top of baseline commit: > | ced7ecee432 Automatic date update in version.in > > Results changed to > # reset_artifacts: > -10 > # build_abe gdb -- --prefix /usr --disable install: > -2 > # build_abe dejagnu: > -1 > # build_abe check_gdb -- --set check_buffer_workaround=gdb-read1: > 0 > # 1 regressions > > From > # reset_artifacts: > -10 > # build_abe gdb -- --prefix /usr --disable install: > -2 > # build_abe dejagnu: > -1 > # build_abe check_gdb -- --set check_buffer_workaround=gdb-read1: > 0 > > The configuration of this build is: > CI config tcwg_gdb_check master-aarch64 > > -8<--8<--8<-- > The information below can be used to reproduce a debug environment: > > Current build : > https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gdb_check--master-aarch64-precommit/2974/artifact/artifacts > Reference build : > https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gdb_check--master-aarch64-build/1474/artifact/artifacts > > Warning: we do not enable maintainer-mode nor automatically update > generated files, which may lead to failures if the patch modifies the > master files. Hello, Could you help me understand what failed? Simon ___ linaro-toolchain mailing list -- linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org To unsubscribe send an email to linaro-toolchain-le...@lists.linaro.org
Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] 2 patches in gdb: Failure on aarch64
Hi Simon, See https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gdb_check--master-aarch64-precommit/2974/artifact/artifacts/artifacts.precommit/06-check_regression/fails.sum/*view*/ . This should have been included in the regression report, but wasn't due to a typo I introduced on Friday. Let me know if you need any assistance in troubleshooting the FAIL. Kind regards, -- Maxim Kuvyrkov https://www.linaro.org > On Jul 27, 2024, at 20:19, Simon Marchi wrote: > > On 2024-07-27 03:34, ci_not...@linaro.org wrote: >> Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your >> patch(es). Please find some details below. If you have any questions, >> please follow up on linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org mailing list, Libera's >> #linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain developer on >> the usual project channel. >> >> We appreciate that it might be difficult to find the necessary logs or >> reproduce the issue locally. If you can't get what you need from our CI >> within minutes, let us know and we will be happy to help. >> >> In gdb_check master-aarch64 after: >> >> | 2 patches in gdb >> | Patchwork URL: https://patchwork.sourceware.org/patch/94605 >> | 9aca4cc6ec5 gdb: pass inferior to gdbarch_update_p >> | f3b21ad781e gdb: pass inferior to target_current_description >> | ... applied on top of baseline commit: >> | ced7ecee432 Automatic date update in version.in >> >> Results changed to >> # reset_artifacts: >> -10 >> # build_abe gdb -- --prefix /usr --disable install: >> -2 >> # build_abe dejagnu: >> -1 >> # build_abe check_gdb -- --set check_buffer_workaround=gdb-read1: >> 0 >> # 1 regressions >> >> From >> # reset_artifacts: >> -10 >> # build_abe gdb -- --prefix /usr --disable install: >> -2 >> # build_abe dejagnu: >> -1 >> # build_abe check_gdb -- --set check_buffer_workaround=gdb-read1: >> 0 >> >> The configuration of this build is: >> CI config tcwg_gdb_check master-aarch64 >> >> -8<--8<--8<-- >> The information below can be used to reproduce a debug environment: >> >> Current build : >> https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gdb_check--master-aarch64-precommit/2974/artifact/artifacts >> Reference build : >> https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gdb_check--master-aarch64-build/1474/artifact/artifacts >> >> Warning: we do not enable maintainer-mode nor automatically update >> generated files, which may lead to failures if the patch modifies the >> master files. > > Hello, > > Could you help me understand what failed? > > Simon > ___ > linaro-toolchain mailing list -- linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org > To unsubscribe send an email to linaro-toolchain-le...@lists.linaro.org ___ linaro-toolchain mailing list -- linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org To unsubscribe send an email to linaro-toolchain-le...@lists.linaro.org
Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-15-2360-gdab0f35fcb4d: Failure on arm
Hi Jason, The regression is ... === g++ tests === Running g++:g++.dg/dg.exp ... FAIL: g++.dg/abi/arm_rtti1.C -std=gnu++26 scan-assembler _ZNKSt9type_infoeqERKS_ It wasn't included in the report due to typo in the scripts. Kind regards, -- Maxim Kuvyrkov https://www.linaro.org > On Jul 28, 2024, at 05:55, ci_not...@linaro.org wrote: > > Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your > patch(es). Please find some details below. If you have any questions, > please follow up on linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org mailing list, Libera's > #linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain developer on > the usual project channel. > > We appreciate that it might be difficult to find the necessary logs or > reproduce the issue locally. If you can't get what you need from our CI > within minutes, let us know and we will be happy to help. > > We track this report status in https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1300 , > please let us know if you are looking at the problem and/or when you have a > fix. > > In gcc_check master-arm after: > > | commit gcc-15-2360-gdab0f35fcb4d > | Author: Jason Merrill > | Date: Fri Jul 26 15:10:50 2024 -0400 > | > | c++: improve C++ testsuite default versions > | > | I wanted to add more cases to the setting of std_list in g++-dg.exp, > but > | didn't want to do a full scan through the file for each case. So this > patch > | improves that in two ways: first, by extracting all interesting lines > on a > | single pass; second, by generating the list more flexibly: now we test > every > | version mentioned explicitly in the testcase, plus a few more if fewer > than > | ... 12 lines of the commit log omitted. > > Results changed to > # reset_artifacts: > -10 > # build_abe gcc: > -2 > # build_abe dejagnu: > -1 > # build_abe check_gcc --: > 0 > # 1 regressions > > From > # reset_artifacts: > -10 > # build_abe gcc: > -2 > # build_abe dejagnu: > -1 > # build_abe check_gcc --: > 0 > > The configuration of this build is: > CI config tcwg_gcc_check master-arm > > -8<--8<--8<-- > The information below can be used to reproduce a debug environment: > > Current build : > https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/2468/artifact/artifacts > Reference build : > https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/2466/artifact/artifacts > > Reproduce last good and first bad builds: > https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/gcc/sha1/dab0f35fcb4dd3ba584422013096c4ebc6bff90d/tcwg_gcc_check/master-arm/reproduction_instructions.txt > > Full commit : > https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/commit/dab0f35fcb4dd3ba584422013096c4ebc6bff90d > > List of configurations that regressed due to this commit : > * tcwg_gcc_check > ** master-arm > *** Failure > *** > https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/gcc/sha1/dab0f35fcb4dd3ba584422013096c4ebc6bff90d/tcwg_gcc_check/master-arm/details.txt > *** > https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/2468/artifact/artifacts ___ linaro-toolchain mailing list -- linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org To unsubscribe send an email to linaro-toolchain-le...@lists.linaro.org
Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-15-2233-g8d1af8f904a: Failure on arm
Hi Andi, The regression is ... === g++ tests === Running g++:g++.dg/dg.exp ... FAIL: c-c++-common/musttail12.c -std=c++14 (test for excess errors) FAIL: c-c++-common/musttail12.c -std=c++17 (test for excess errors) FAIL: c-c++-common/musttail12.c -std=c++20 (test for excess errors) FAIL: g++.dg/musttail6.C (test for excess errors) It wasn't included in the report due to typo in the scripts. Kind regards, -- Maxim Kuvyrkov https://www.linaro.org > On Jul 26, 2024, at 19:38, ci_not...@linaro.org wrote: > > Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your > patch(es). Please find some details below. If you have any questions, > please follow up on linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org mailing list, Libera's > #linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain developer on > the usual project channel. > > We appreciate that it might be difficult to find the necessary logs or > reproduce the issue locally. If you can't get what you need from our CI > within minutes, let us know and we will be happy to help. > > We track this report status in https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1299 , > please let us know if you are looking at the problem and/or when you have a > fix. > > In gcc_check master-arm after: > > | commit gcc-15-2233-g8d1af8f904a > | Author: Andi Kleen > | Date: Tue Jan 23 23:54:56 2024 -0800 > | > | Add tests for C/C++ musttail attributes > | > | Some adopted from the existing C musttail plugin tests. > | Also extends the ability to query the sibcall capabilities of the > | target. > | > | gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: > | ... 16 lines of the commit log omitted. > > Results changed to > # reset_artifacts: > -10 > # build_abe gcc: > -2 > # build_abe dejagnu: > -1 > # build_abe check_gcc --: > 0 > # 4 regressions > > From > # reset_artifacts: > -10 > # build_abe gcc: > -2 > # build_abe dejagnu: > -1 > # build_abe check_gcc --: > 0 > > The configuration of this build is: > CI config tcwg_gcc_check master-arm > > -8<--8<--8<-- > The information below can be used to reproduce a debug environment: > > Current build : > https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/2460/artifact/artifacts > Reference build : > https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/2459/artifact/artifacts > > Reproduce last good and first bad builds: > https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/gcc/sha1/8d1af8f904a0c08656d976cbf8ca56dba35197b0/tcwg_gcc_check/master-arm/reproduction_instructions.txt > > Full commit : > https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/commit/8d1af8f904a0c08656d976cbf8ca56dba35197b0 > > List of configurations that regressed due to this commit : > * tcwg_gcc_check > ** master-arm > *** Failure > *** > https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/gcc/sha1/8d1af8f904a0c08656d976cbf8ca56dba35197b0/tcwg_gcc_check/master-arm/details.txt > *** > https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/2460/artifact/artifacts ___ linaro-toolchain mailing list -- linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org To unsubscribe send an email to linaro-toolchain-le...@lists.linaro.org
Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] llvmorg-20-init-488-g65361ff80c18: FAIL: 2 regressions on aarch64
Hi Christudasan, Please ignore this report; it wasn't supposed to be posted publicly. We are setting up additional testing of Flang, and this CI is in testing. Kind regards, -- Maxim Kuvyrkov https://www.linaro.org > On Jul 26, 2024, at 23:02, ci_not...@linaro.org wrote: > > Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your > patch(es). Please find some details below. If you have any questions, > please follow up on linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org mailing list, Libera's > #linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain developer on > the usual project channel. > > We appreciate that it might be difficult to find the necessary logs or > reproduce the issue locally. If you can't get what you need from our CI > within minutes, let us know and we will be happy to help. > > We track this report status in https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/LLVM-1291 > , please let us know if you are looking at the problem and/or when you have a > fix. > > In CI config tcwg_flang_test/main-aarch64-O3-sve_vla after: > > | commit llvmorg-20-init-488-g65361ff80c18 > | Author: Christudasan Devadasan > | Date: Fri Jul 26 20:03:45 2024 +0530 > | > | [AMDGPU] Use SubtargetPredicate instead of OtherPredicates for > subtarget predication. (#100715) > > FAIL: 2 regressions > > regressions.sum: > === test-suite tests === > > Running test-suite:Fujitsu/Fortran/0291 ... > FAIL: test-suite :: Fujitsu/Fortran/0291/Fujitsu-Fortran-0291_0008.test > > Running test-suite:Fujitsu/Fortran/0338 ... > FAIL: test-suite :: Fujitsu/Fortran/0338/Fujitsu-Fortran-0338_0061.test > > > You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in > - > https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-O3-sve_vla-build/8/artifact/artifacts/00-sumfiles/ > The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make > commands are in > - > https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-O3-sve_vla-build/8/artifact/artifacts/notify/ > The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in > - > https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-O3-sve_vla-build/8/artifact/artifacts/sumfiles/xfails.xfail > > The configuration of this build is: > CI config tcwg_flang_test/main-aarch64-O3-sve_vla > > -8<--8<--8<-- > The information below can be used to reproduce a debug environment: > > Current build : > https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-O3-sve_vla-build/8/artifact/artifacts > Reference build : > https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-O3-sve_vla-build/5/artifact/artifacts > > Reproduce last good and first bad builds: > https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/llvm/sha1/65361ff80c18b5920eb45091ff39c1d67fbb325d/tcwg_flang_test/main-aarch64-O3-sve_vla/reproduction_instructions.txt > > Full commit : > https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/65361ff80c18b5920eb45091ff39c1d67fbb325d > > List of configurations that regressed due to this commit : > * tcwg_flang_test > ** main-aarch64-O3-sve_vla > *** FAIL: 2 regressions > *** > https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/llvm/sha1/65361ff80c18b5920eb45091ff39c1d67fbb325d/tcwg_flang_test/main-aarch64-O3-sve_vla/details.txt > *** > https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-O3-sve_vla-build/8/artifact/artifacts ___ linaro-toolchain mailing list -- linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org To unsubscribe send an email to linaro-toolchain-le...@lists.linaro.org
Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-15-2362-ga9e9f772c748: Failure on arm
Hi Jason, For this one the regressions are: === g++ tests === Running g++:g++.dg/dg.exp ... FAIL: g++.dg/cpp2a/consteval-prop21.C -std=c++20 (test for excess errors) FAIL: g++.dg/cpp2a/consteval-prop21.C -std=c++23 (test for excess errors) FAIL: g++.dg/cpp2a/consteval-prop21.C -std=c++26 (test for excess errors) -- Maxim Kuvyrkov https://www.linaro.org > On Jul 28, 2024, at 09:28, ci_not...@linaro.org wrote: > > Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your > patch(es). Please find some details below. If you have any questions, > please follow up on linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org mailing list, Libera's > #linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain developer on > the usual project channel. > > We appreciate that it might be difficult to find the necessary logs or > reproduce the issue locally. If you can't get what you need from our CI > within minutes, let us know and we will be happy to help. > > We track this report status in https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1301 , > please let us know if you are looking at the problem and/or when you have a > fix. > > In gcc_check master-arm after: > > | commit gcc-15-2362-ga9e9f772c748 > | Author: Jason Merrill > | Date: Fri Jul 26 17:20:18 2024 -0400 > | > | c++: consteval propagation and templates [PR115986] > | > | Here the call to e() makes us decide to check d() for escalation at > EOF, but > | while checking it we try to fold_immediate 0_c, and get confused by the > | template trees. Let's not mess with escalation for function templates. > | > | PR c++/115986 > | ... 9 lines of the commit log omitted. > > Results changed to > # reset_artifacts: > -10 > # build_abe gcc: > -2 > # build_abe dejagnu: > -1 > # build_abe check_gcc --: > 0 > # 3 regressions > > From > # reset_artifacts: > -10 > # build_abe gcc: > -2 > # build_abe dejagnu: > -1 > # build_abe check_gcc --: > 0 > > The configuration of this build is: > CI config tcwg_gcc_check master-arm > > -8<--8<--8<-- > The information below can be used to reproduce a debug environment: > > Current build : > https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/2472/artifact/artifacts > Reference build : > https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/2471/artifact/artifacts > > Reproduce last good and first bad builds: > https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/gcc/sha1/a9e9f772c7488ac0c09dd92f28890bdab939771a/tcwg_gcc_check/master-arm/reproduction_instructions.txt > > Full commit : > https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/commit/a9e9f772c7488ac0c09dd92f28890bdab939771a > > List of configurations that regressed due to this commit : > * tcwg_gcc_check > ** master-arm > *** Failure > *** > https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/gcc/sha1/a9e9f772c7488ac0c09dd92f28890bdab939771a/tcwg_gcc_check/master-arm/details.txt > *** > https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/2472/artifact/artifacts ___ linaro-toolchain mailing list -- linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org To unsubscribe send an email to linaro-toolchain-le...@lists.linaro.org
