Hi,
I am looking into these regressions.
Regards,
Surya
On 26/06/24 7:51 am, ci_not...@linaro.org wrote:
> Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your
> patch(es). Please find some details below. If you have any questions,
> please follow up on linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org mailing list, Libera's
> #linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain developer on
> the usual project channel.
>
> We appreciate that it might be difficult to find the necessary logs or
> reproduce the issue locally. If you can't get what you need from our CI
> within minutes, let us know and we will be happy to help.
>
> We track this report status in https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1270 ,
> please let us know if you are looking at the problem and/or when you have a
> fix.
>
> In gcc_check master-aarch64 after:
>
> | commit gcc-15-1619-g3b9b8d6cfdf5
> | Author: Surya Kumari Jangala
> | Date: Tue Jun 25 08:37:49 2024 -0500
> |
> | ira: Scale save/restore costs of callee save registers with block
> frequency
> |
> | In assign_hard_reg(), when computing the costs of the hard registers,
> the
> | cost of saving/restoring a callee-save hard register in prolog/epilog
> is
> | taken into consideration. However, this cost is not scaled with the
> entry
> | block frequency. Without scaling, the cost of saving/restoring is
> quite
> | small and this can result in a callee-save register being chosen by
> | ... 14 lines of the commit log omitted.
>
> FAIL: 4 regressions
>
> regressions.sum:
> === g++ tests ===
>
> Running g++:g++.target/aarch64/sve/acle/aarch64-sve-acle.exp ...
> FAIL: gcc.target/aarch64/sve/acle/general/cpy_1.c -march=armv8.2-a+sve
> -moverride=tune=none check-function-bodies dup_x0_m
> === gcc tests ===
>
> Running gcc:gcc.dg/dg.exp ...
> FAIL: gcc.dg/pr10474.c scan-rtl-dump pro_and_epilogue "Performing
> shrink-wrapping"
>
> Running gcc:gcc.target/aarch64/sve/acle/aarch64-sve-acle.exp ...
> ... and 5 more entries
>
> You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in
> -
> https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-aarch64-build/2235/artifact/artifacts/00-sumfiles/
> The full lists of regressions and progressions as well as configure and make
> commands are in
> -
> https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-aarch64-build/2235/artifact/artifacts/notify/
> The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in
> -
> https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-aarch64-build/2235/artifact/artifacts/sumfiles/xfails.xfail
>
> The configuration of this build is:
> CI config tcwg_gcc_check master-aarch64
>
> -8<--8<--8<--
> The information below can be used to reproduce a debug environment:
>
> Current build :
> https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-aarch64-build/2235/artifact/artifacts
> Reference build :
> https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-aarch64-build/2234/artifact/artifacts
>
> Reproduce last good and first bad builds:
> https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/gcc/sha1/3b9b8d6cfdf59337f4b7ce10ce92a98044b2657b/tcwg_gcc_check/master-aarch64/reproduction_instructions.txt
>
> Full commit :
> https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/commit/3b9b8d6cfdf59337f4b7ce10ce92a98044b2657b
>
> List of configurations that regressed due to this commit :
> * tcwg_gcc_check
> ** master-aarch64
> *** FAIL: 4 regressions
> ***
> https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/gcc/sha1/3b9b8d6cfdf59337f4b7ce10ce92a98044b2657b/tcwg_gcc_check/master-aarch64/details.txt
> ***
> https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-aarch64-build/2235/artifact/artifacts
___
linaro-toolchain mailing list -- linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org
To unsubscribe send an email to linaro-toolchain-le...@lists.linaro.org
