LLVM buildbot clang-aarch64-full-2stage

[orlando.hy...@sony.com]

Hi,

I noticed this address registered as the admin for this LLVM buildbot - 
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/workers/134).

I caused a failure at the start of the week 
(https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/179/builds/9629). I think it's a 
build (or test) configuration problem as outlined in this small PR 
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-zorg/pull/139.

I can see the bot is currently failing now too 
(https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/179/builds/9681). I haven't looked at 
it closely but given the same tests are failing in a similar way (a different 
bitcode error from LLD), I imagine that might also be fixed by my llvm-zorg 
pull request above?

Please can someone look at the llvm-zorg pull request when you have a spare 
moment? I have my LLVM change that caused the initial failure reverted in the 
meantime.

Thanks,
Orlando
___
linaro-toolchain mailing list -- linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org
To unsubscribe send an email to linaro-toolchain-le...@lists.linaro.org

Re: LLVM buildbot clang-aarch64-full-2stage

[Omair Javaid]

Hi Orlando,

Thanks for getting in touch. I have just approved your zorg pull request.

Please request Galina Kistanova gkistan...@gmail.com for buildbots restart
once you merge your changes to zorg.



On Fri, 22 Mar 2024 at 17:25, orlando.hy...@sony.com 
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I noticed this address registered as the admin for this LLVM buildbot -
> https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/workers/134).
>
> I caused a failure at the start of the week (
> https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/179/builds/9629). I think it's a
> build (or test) configuration problem as outlined in this small PR
> https://github.com/llvm/llvm-zorg/pull/139.
>
> I can see the bot is currently failing now too (
> https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/179/builds/9681). I haven't
> looked at it closely but given the same tests are failing in a similar way
> (a different bitcode error from LLD), I imagine that might also be fixed by
> my llvm-zorg pull request above?
>
> Please can someone look at the llvm-zorg pull request when you have a
> spare moment? I have my LLVM change that caused the initial failure
> reverted in the meantime.
>
> Thanks,
> Orlando
> ___
> linaro-toolchain mailing list -- linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to linaro-toolchain-le...@lists.linaro.org
>
___
linaro-toolchain mailing list -- linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org
To unsubscribe send an email to linaro-toolchain-le...@lists.linaro.org

RE: LLVM buildbot clang-aarch64-full-2stage

[orlando.hy...@sony.com]

Thanks very much, will do.

-Orlando

From: Omair Javaid 
Sent: Friday, March 22, 2024 12:34 PM
To: Cazalet-Hyams, Orlando 
Cc: linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org
Subject: Re: LLVM buildbot clang-aarch64-full-2stage

Hi Orlando,

Thanks for getting in touch. I have just approved your zorg pull request.

Please request Galina Kistanova 
gkistan...@gmail.com for buildbots restart once 
you merge your changes to zorg.



On Fri, 22 Mar 2024 at 17:25, 
orlando.hy...@sony.com 
mailto:orlando.hy...@sony.com>> wrote:
Hi,

I noticed this address registered as the admin for this LLVM buildbot - 
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/workers/134).

I caused a failure at the start of the week 
(https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/179/builds/9629).
 I think it's a build (or test) configuration problem as outlined in this small 
PR 
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-zorg/pull/139.

I can see the bot is currently failing now too 
(https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/179/builds/9681).
 I haven't looked at it closely but given the same tests are failing in a 
similar way (a different bitcode error from LLD), I imagine that might also be 
fixed by my llvm-zorg pull request above?

Please can someone look at the llvm-zorg pull request when you have a spare 
moment? I have my LLVM change that caused the initial failure reverted in the 
meantime.

Thanks,
Orlando
___
linaro-toolchain mailing list -- 
linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 
linaro-toolchain-le...@lists.linaro.org
___
linaro-toolchain mailing list -- linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org
To unsubscribe send an email to linaro-toolchain-le...@lists.linaro.org

[ACTIVITY] report week ending 22 Mar

[Peter Maydell]

Progress (short week, 3 days):
 * UM-2 [QEMU upstream maintainership]
  - more softfreeze related work: tagged rc0 this week
  - spent some time looking through Huawei's FEAT_NMI patchset; this is
in basically good shape but there are a number of minor bugs/missing
bits of the feature for them to work through still
  - reviewed a patchset adding nucleo-g071rb (an STM32G0 based board)

-- PMM
___
linaro-toolchain mailing list -- linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org
To unsubscribe send an email to linaro-toolchain-le...@lists.linaro.org