RE: [ACTIVITY] 4-8 Feb 2013
Hi Andrew, I have not started on this task yet. As you know the backpack ground for this task is http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54742 ( Coremark bench) Thank you for the pointers and people who I can contact. I will take a look and get back to you on the jump threading via VRP. Regards, Venkat. -Original Message- From: linaro-toolchain-boun...@lists.linaro.org [mailto:linaro-toolchain-boun...@lists.linaro.org] On Behalf Of Pinski, Andrew Sent: Sunday, February 10, 2013 1:24 PM To: Venkataramanan Kumar; linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org Subject: RE: [ACTIVITY] 4-8 Feb 2013 >* Start analysis on jump threading in GCC. What kind of analysis are you going to do? I have some helpful hints dealing with the jump threading in VRP. Really DOM should be removed fully as most if not all the other optimizers already do its job. Also you should do this analysis on the GCC list right away because Jeff Law and Steven Bosscher can help you understand why things are done currently the way they are done. You will gain more optimizations improving VRP rather than improving jump threading in general. Thanks, Andrew Pinski From: linaro-toolchain-boun...@lists.linaro.org [linaro-toolchain-boun...@lists.linaro.org] on behalf of Venkataramanan Kumar [venkataramanan.ku...@linaro.org] Sent: Saturday, February 09, 2013 11:43 PM To: linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org Subject: [ACTIVITY] 4-8 Feb 2013 == Progress == * Implementing GC sections support in bintuils Looking at aarch64 relocations to consider while sweeping. * Cbuild experiments to test gcc svn aarch64 4.7 branch. Connection problems to the cbuild machines are solved now. Thanks to Matt. Spawned the build. Misc -- * Attend tool chain weekly meet, and stand up call * Had a look at one x86_64 related patch that gone into GCC trunk. == Next week == * Continue Implementing GC sections support in binutils. * Start analysis on jump threading in GCC. ___ linaro-toolchain mailing list linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain ___ linaro-toolchain mailing list linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain ___ linaro-toolchain mailing list linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain
Re: aarch64 does not run
On 10 February 2013 04:36, Wink Saville wrote: > I downloaded the aarch64 binaries to a ubuntu machine: > > wink@ssi-primary:~$ uname -a > Linux ssi-primary 3.5.0-21-generic #32-Ubuntu SMP Tue Dec 11 18:51:59 UTC > 2012 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux > > > And when I try to run gcc-4.7.3: > > wink@ssi-primary:~$ ls -al > ~/aarch64-toolchain/gcc-linaro-aarch64-linux-gnu-4.7+bzr115029-20121015+bzr2506_linux/bin/aarch64-linux-gnu-gcc-4.7.3 > -rwxr-xr-x 1 wink wink 553068 Oct 18 14:21 > /home/wink/aarch64-toolchain/gcc-linaro-aarch64-linux-gnu-4.7+bzr115029-20121015+bzr2506_linux/bin/aarch64-linux-gnu-gcc-4.7.3 > > I get a file not found: > > wink@ssi-primary:~$ strace > /home/wink/aarch64-toolchain/gcc-linaro-aarch64-linux-gnu-4.7+bzr115029-20121015+bzr2506_linux/bin/aarch64-linux-gnu-gcc-4.7.3 > -v > > execve("/home/wink/aarch64-toolchain/gcc-linaro-aarch64-linux-gnu-4.7+bzr115029-20121015+bzr2506_linux/bin/aarch64-linux-gnu-gcc-4.7.3", > ["/home/wink/aarch64-toolchain/gcc"..., "-v"], [/* 19 vars */]) = -1 > ENOENT (No such file or directory) This error usually means the executable is requesting a non-existent "interpreter" (dynamic loader). You need to install the 32-bit compat lib package. I don't remember what it's called on ubuntu, probably ia32-libs or similar. -- Mans Rullgard / mru ___ linaro-toolchain mailing list linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain
gcc-4.7 fsf merge has some issues
looking at http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~linaro-toolchain-dev/gcc-linaro/4.7/revision/115051 the first chunk of gcc/Makefile.in was wrongly merged. The first "# Multiarch support" should be removed. Same for gcc/configure.ac. gcc/configure needs to be regenerated. Thanks, Matthias ___ linaro-toolchain mailing list linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain
Re: gcc-4.7 fsf merge has some issues
Thanks Matthias for catching this, I pushed a fix and the merge request is ongoing. Yvan On 10 February 2013 15:56, Matthias Klose wrote: > looking at > http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~linaro-toolchain-dev/gcc-linaro/4.7/revision/115051 > > the first chunk of gcc/Makefile.in was wrongly merged. The first "# Multiarch > support" should be removed. Same for gcc/configure.ac. gcc/configure needs to > be > regenerated. > > Thanks, Matthias ___ linaro-toolchain mailing list linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain