Draft release notes for 2012.07
Draft release notes are here https://wiki.linaro.org/RamanaRadhakrishnan/Sandbox/GCC201207DraftReleaseNotes#preview Can folks have a quick look to see if I've missed something ? Ramana ___ linaro-toolchain mailing list linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain
Re: Draft release notes for 2012.07
Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote: > https://wiki.linaro.org/RamanaRadhakrishnan/Sandbox/ > GCC201207DraftReleaseNotes#preview > > Can folks have a quick look to see if I've missed something ? Looks good to me. Mit freundlichen Gruessen / Best Regards Ulrich Weigand -- Dr. Ulrich Weigand | Phone: +49-7031/16-3727 STSM, GNU compiler and toolchain for Linux on System z and Cell/B.E. IBM Deutschland Research & Development GmbH Vorsitzende des Aufsichtsrats: Martina Koederitz | Geschäftsführung: Dirk Wittkopp Sitz der Gesellschaft: Böblingen | Registergericht: Amtsgericht Stuttgart, HRB 243294 ___ linaro-toolchain mailing list linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain
Remaining release steps
Hi Ramana. These are covered by the release process documentation but I thought I'd fill them out. The builds are completing. You can see the finished grid at: http://ex.seabright.co.nz/helpers/buildlog/gcc-linaro-4.7-2012 Click on 'Compare' for each machine to see the results like: http://ex.seabright.co.nz/helpers/testcompare/gcc-linaro-4.7-2012.07/logs/armv7l-natty-cbuild342-tcpanda05-cortexa9r1/gcc-testsuite.txt The test compare picks a close version but falls back to something ancient. Add the correct previous version like: http://ex.seabright.co.nz/helpers/testcompare/gcc-linaro-4.7-2012.07/logs/armv7l-natty-cbuild342-tcpanda05-cortexa9r1/gcc-testsuite.txt?base=gcc-linaro-4.7-2012.06 Check for any differences by searching for 'Just in'. A is the previous release, B is this. There's one regression in http://ex.seabright.co.nz/helpers/testcompare/gcc-linaro-4.7-2012.07/logs/armv7l-natty-cbuild342-tcpanda06-armv5r2/gcc-testsuite.txt?base=gcc-linaro-4.7-2012.06 which is: gcc.target/arm/pr42172-1.c scan-assembler-times ldr 1 I'd normally check our upstream builds: http://ex.seabright.co.nz/helpers/buildlog/gcc-4.7+svn but this is a ARMv5 fault and we only track Cortex-A9. Checking gcc-testresults shows: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2012-07/msg00171.html so the fault is upstream. I've spawned the test-oecore-gcc-linaro-4.7-2012.07 / x86_64-heavy and ubutest-gcc-linaro-4.7-2012.07 / i686,x86_64 jobs. The results will pop up similar to the 4.6 ones in the buildlog. -- Michael ___ linaro-toolchain mailing list linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain
Re: Remaining release steps
On 6 July 2012 00:10, Michael Hope wrote: > Hi Ramana. These are covered by the release process documentation but > I thought I'd fill them out. > > The builds are completing. You can see the finished grid at: > http://ex.seabright.co.nz/helpers/buildlog/gcc-linaro-4.7-2012 > > Click on 'Compare' for each machine to see the results like: > > http://ex.seabright.co.nz/helpers/testcompare/gcc-linaro-4.7-2012.07/logs/armv7l-natty-cbuild342-tcpanda05-cortexa9r1/gcc-testsuite.txt > > The test compare picks a close version but falls back to something > ancient. Add the correct previous version like: > > http://ex.seabright.co.nz/helpers/testcompare/gcc-linaro-4.7-2012.07/logs/armv7l-natty-cbuild342-tcpanda05-cortexa9r1/gcc-testsuite.txt?base=gcc-linaro-4.7-2012.06 > > Check for any differences by searching for 'Just in'. A is the > previous release, B is this. There's one regression in > > http://ex.seabright.co.nz/helpers/testcompare/gcc-linaro-4.7-2012.07/logs/armv7l-natty-cbuild342-tcpanda06-armv5r2/gcc-testsuite.txt?base=gcc-linaro-4.7-2012.06 > > which is: > gcc.target/arm/pr42172-1.c scan-assembler-times ldr 1 The test results look fine for all but . http://ex.seabright.co.nz/build/gcc-linaro-4.7-2012.07/logs/x86_64-precise-cbuild344-tcserver01x5-x86_64r1/ thinks the oecore builds failed. Is this the expected behaviour ? I also don't yet see ubutest or benchmarks for 4.6 having run for the arm boards so I've tried spawning them again. Ramana Ramana > > I'd normally check our upstream builds: > http://ex.seabright.co.nz/helpers/buildlog/gcc-4.7+svn > > but this is a ARMv5 fault and we only track Cortex-A9. Checking > gcc-testresults shows: > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2012-07/msg00171.html > > so the fault is upstream. > > I've spawned the test-oecore-gcc-linaro-4.7-2012.07 / x86_64-heavy and > ubutest-gcc-linaro-4.7-2012.07 / i686,x86_64 jobs. The results will > pop up similar to the 4.6 ones in the buildlog. > > -- Michael ___ linaro-toolchain mailing list linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain
