Re: Qt5 version of qimageblitz
On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 2:08 AM, Boudewijn Rempt wrote: > On Wed, 9 Mar 2016, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > I guess for that we need to decide if it should be a framework first or >> not. >> > > Isn't kolourpaint the only user of qimageblitz at the moment? Krita used > to use it, years and years ago, but that's no longer the case. If > Kolourpaint is the only user, I'd actually suggest just taking the code > into kolourpaint and dropping the library entirely. Tellico uses it, for a little extra bling. It's no longer a hard dependency, though. Robby
Re: Next Gen CI Will Be Moving to Production Shortly: Upcoming Changes
On Sat, May 6, 2017 at 5:37 AM, Ben Cooksley wrote: > Which brings me to the third point of attention. We'll only be adding > projects to the Next Gen CI system at their request going forward. For > Frameworks, Applications and Plasma this is something which we're > essentially assuming we're going to receive from their release > managers, so we'll take care of defining the initial Products for > those. For Extragear projects, please respond to this thread if you'd > like CI coverage (to continue) to be provided to you. > Please keep CI coverage for Tellico, for next Gen. Thanks! Robby
Re: EBN Still Needed?
On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 4:15 PM Allen Winter wrote: > I was notified today that the Krazy runs on the EBN have been stuck (due > to a stale lockfile) > for over 3 months. Is this an indication that nobody looks at the EBN > reports any longer? > I check EBN sporadically, not regularly. Probably on a quarter-ish basis for Tellico. I appreciate its usefulness. But has the EBN code and documentation checking service out lived its > usefulness? > Shut it down? > I would say no, unless it's truly a burden. Robby
Review Request: kdoctools hard-codes the GNU FDL license and ignores dual-licensing
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/103011/ --- Review request for kdelibs. Description --- For documentation, the current KDE docbook customization hard-codes a link to the GNU-FDL for every in the doc. While the KDE licensing policy requires documentation to be licensed under the FDL, it does not prohibit dual-licensing (or triple or whatever...). But the current docbook processing doesn't show the second license. This patch maintains current behavior when the element includes the link to the FDL, but falls back to normal docbook processing for legal notices which do not reference the FDL. Diffs - kdoctools/customization/kde-chunk.xsl 096de1b Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/103011/diff/diff Testing --- Tested with Tellico's documentation, which is dual-licensed under the GNU FDL and the FreeBSD Documentation License. Also forwarded to the kde-docbook list http://lists.kde.org/?l=kde-docbook&m=132004433310804&w=2 Thanks, Robby Stephenson
Re: Sunsetting Qt 5
On Sat, Dec 7, 2024 at 6:44 AM Volker Krause wrote: > > There's 8 repositories with Qt5 CD jobs: > - education/kstars > - graphics/glaxnimate > - graphics/peruse > - network/kaidan > - office/crow-translate > - office/kmymoney > - office/tellico > - sdk/umbrello > > Probably worth reviewing in more detail where those are on the way to Qt6 > and > what can be done to support/accelerate the transition. > In Tellico's case, it's fully ported to Qt6. It still compiles on Qt5, though, which is why the CD job hasn't been removed. I figured I'd keep it running until it wasn't supported. Robby
