RE: [Gossip] rdf vs. rss
I received a few private votes for keeping the .xml rss 2.0 feed, if we eliminate one of them. Thanks. Jeff -Original Message- From: Jeff Marshall Date: 7/18/06 10:37 am To: gossip@jab.org Subj: [Gossip] rdf vs. rss We currently serve up two flavors of rss on The Mail Archive. Does anybody have a strong preference on which one they use? Does it matter to you? Are they virtually interchangeable? We're considering dropping one. Thanks. Jeff ___ Discussion list for The Mail Archive Gossip@jab.org http://jab.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gossip ___ Discussion list for The Mail Archive Gossip@jab.org http://jab.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gossip
Re: [Gossip] rdf vs. rss
On 19 Jul 2006 11:46:45 -0700, Jeff Marshall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I received a few private votes for keeping the .xml rss 2.0 feed, if we eliminate one of them. I think we should deprecate the RDF variant (e.g. remove it from the FAQ) then actually remove the feature once we're sure nobody is using it. Or in a year or two, whichever comes first. ___ Discussion list for The Mail Archive Gossip@jab.org http://jab.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gossip
