Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: dev-db/pgadmin4
The subject seems to be wrong. It says pgadmin4, but the mask says pgadmin3. Aaron W. Swenson schrieb am Fr., 26. Okt. 2018 um 01:38 Uhr: > # Aaron W. Swenson (25 Oct 2018) > # Fails to build against up to date OpenSSL library (Bug 663966). No longer > # supported upstream. Use dev-db/pgadmin4. > # Masked for removal on 2018-11-24, bug #669650. > dev-db/pgadmin3 >
Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] app-emulation/libvirt-snmp: version bump to 0.0.4
On 10/26/2018 06:52 AM, Mikle Kolyada wrote: > > > On 26.10.2018 04:04, Matthias Maier wrote: >>> could you please stop sending project related stuff to the -dev mailing >>> list? It is irrelevant place to provide bump patches >> Why? What's the purpose of a developer mailing list then? > Because we have github/project alias for that purpose > So the desired way is to use github pull requests? That is rather unfortunate. Michal
Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: dev-db/pgadmin4
On 2018-10-26 10:13, Bernd Waibel wrote: > The subject seems to be wrong. It says pgadmin4, but the mask says pgadmin3. Bah! Yeah, definitely pgadmin3 is getting it’s last rites. pgadmin4 will stick around for a while. signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: dev-db/pgadmin3 [CORRECTION]
On 2018-10-25 19:37, Aaron W. Swenson wrote: > # Aaron W. Swenson (25 Oct 2018) > # Fails to build against up to date OpenSSL library (Bug 663966). No longer > # supported upstream. Use dev-db/pgadmin4. > # Masked for removal on 2018-11-24, bug #669650. > dev-db/pgadmin3 I had a typo in the subject. I definitely mean dev-db/pgadmin3. signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] app-emulation/libvirt-snmp: version bump to 0.0.4
On 10/26/2018 04:40 AM, Michal Prívozník wrote: > > So the desired way is to use github pull requests? That is rather > unfortunate. In this case there's no "project" associated with libvirt-snmp; but if there were, it would have a @gentoo.org alias that you could send patches to. Bugzilla is still the official (and in this case, best) place to put these in my opinion. Personally I don't mind them on the -dev list, but they do get sent to a thousand people who have no interest in or ability to commit them.
[gentoo-dev] last rites: dev-tcltk/ck
# Andreas K. Hüttel (20 Oct 2018) # Fails to build with glibc-2.27, bug 648620. No reverse # dependencies. Removal in 30 days. dev-tcltk/ck -- Andreas K. Hüttel dilfri...@gentoo.org Gentoo Linux developer (council, toolchain, perl, libreoffice, comrel) signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Last rites: dev-db/pgadmin4
On venerdì 26 ottobre 2018 01:37:50 CEST Aaron W. Swenson wrote: > # Aaron W. Swenson (25 Oct 2018) > # Fails to build against up to date OpenSSL library (Bug 663966). No longer > # supported upstream. Use dev-db/pgadmin4. > # Masked for removal on 2018-11-24, bug #669650. > dev-db/pgadmin3 I guess there is a typo in the subject. -- Agostino Sarubbo Gentoo Linux Developer
