[gentoo-dev] Last-rites: dev-php/PEAR-File_PDF
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 # Matti Bickel (21 Nov 2013) # Outdated, beta and abandoned upstream, removal on 20131220 dev-php/PEAR-File_PDF -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iKYEARECAGYFAlKOcstfFIAALgAoaXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3Bl bnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldEM4NjQwRkYxM0E5ODM3Q0Q4MEE1MDJDMDdD RDMxQ0ExNDg0OUVDNkMACgkQfNMcoUhJ7GyKKwCcCNYw7l9XdeMipMZIVRhsnEnE 2mcAnRalL+mdPdkA4EouzJ4yDDe3oCz3 =Xc3l -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: New project: Licenses
On 2013.11.21 15:21, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > > On Thu, 21 Nov 2013, hasufell wrote: > > >> For the time being, it will be listed as a top-level project. > >> (There were some ideas that Licenses could be a subproject of > >> another TLP, but so far this hasn't worked out.) > > > It should be a subproject of QA. > > Indeed, that's one of the two TLPs that were suggested. The past QA > disliked having Licenses as their subproject, though. It depends on > how the role of QA is defined: If it is seen as primarily technical, > then Licenses (which is largely non-technical) doesn't fit so well. > > Ulrich > ... or maybe a sub committee of the Gentoo Foundation Inc? because of the non technical and legal implications of the work. Trustees get involved with licence corner cases anyway, so a team of advisors would be a good fit. -- Regards, Roy Bamford (Neddyseagoon) a member of elections gentoo-ops forum-mods trustees pgpbmaaTdiQIB.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: New project: Licenses
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 11/20/2013 03:22 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > Hello all, > > The licenses team exists since some time with an e-mail alias > only, and we think it's about time to "upgrade" to a project. > > http://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Licenses > > "This is a small team in Gentoo that try to make heads & tails of > license terms, so that we can detect conflicts between licenses in > packages, and know when it's safe to redistribute distfiles, or > include binaries in stages and media." > > For the time being, it will be listed as a top-level project. > (There were some ideas that Licenses could be a subproject of > another TLP, but so far this hasn't worked out.) > > Ulrich > It should be a subproject of QA. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJSjhsRAAoJEFpvPKfnPDWzsoIH/0QRu6mxc1Rm9DWYkPzFwHCN +OSMyeqD82e2JB/jBCsxyR9v9VCw3UwV7ZXugJjDwO7ScC/vcHJBvEY9w/F8env7 cYsF5p65SlfQXEfcNtDeY4jux+FF8MT+StbOBQxzZZlxhU6yPeA37ciVp+WJ+xup jLaPBaBB4lKv6tPxucgqpHfgxklXKsrKSQQM+r0jACt9MBcqJWaGa1JaUZa3xSGp mMPLipekb6/pc4eoTY6LFmBv0KZf4qrgt0X07sZ3CM/aUyaUKV+ABl0IHhp/sLHl 4LuvhTGRyCXq4JkcSns5BnhOFrETK8R6QR3Ukn9tQ6q2FCLHP3QZPgNVCsmh4jk= =Fpg2 -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: New project: Licenses
> On Thu, 21 Nov 2013, hasufell wrote: >> For the time being, it will be listed as a top-level project. >> (There were some ideas that Licenses could be a subproject of >> another TLP, but so far this hasn't worked out.) > It should be a subproject of QA. Indeed, that's one of the two TLPs that were suggested. The past QA disliked having Licenses as their subproject, though. It depends on how the role of QA is defined: If it is seen as primarily technical, then Licenses (which is largely non-technical) doesn't fit so well. Ulrich pgp5Du_iFHJI0.pgp Description: PGP signature
