[gentoo-dev] Lastrite: net-libs/libicq2000
# Pacho Ramos (25 Jul 2011) # No new release since 2002, doesn't respect LDFLAGS and # still needing old libsigc++:1.0. Removal in 30 days. (#358589) net-libs/libicq2000 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
[gentoo-dev] Lastrite: dev-libs/libsigc++:1.0
# Pacho Ramos (25 Jul 2011) # Old and unmaintained for a long time, bug #358587. # Removal in 30 days =dev-libs/libsigc++-1.0* signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [gentoo-dev] Ohloh statistics updated
On Fri, 22 Jul 2011 15:11:43 +0200 Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote: > So go claim your commits, Great work! > [1] https://www.ohloh.net/p/gentoo > [2] > http://git-exp.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=exp/gentoo-x86.git;a=summary It appears they count rather more commits than does CIA - Manifest commits look to be the likely cause. jer
Re: [gentoo-dev] Ohloh statistics updated
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 11:00 PM, Jeroen Roovers wrote: > On Fri, 22 Jul 2011 15:11:43 +0200 > Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote: > >> So go claim your commits, > > Great work! > >> [1] https://www.ohloh.net/p/gentoo >> [2] >> http://git-exp.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=exp/gentoo-x86.git;a=summary > > It appears they count rather more commits than does CIA - Manifest > commits look to be the likely cause. > Another reason for all of us to move to gpg signed manifests — another commit free with every ebuild commit! -- ~Nirbheek Chauhan Gentoo GNOME+Mozilla Team
Re: [gentoo-dev] Ohloh statistics updated
On Tue, 26 Jul 2011 01:29:01 +0530 Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: > On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 11:00 PM, Jeroen Roovers > wrote: > > On Fri, 22 Jul 2011 15:11:43 +0200 > > Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote: > > > >> So go claim your commits, > > > > Great work! > > > >> [1] https://www.ohloh.net/p/gentoo > >> [2] > >> http://git-exp.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=exp/gentoo-x86.git;a=summary > > > > It appears they count rather more commits than does CIA - Manifest > > commits look to be the likely cause. > > > > Another reason for all of us to move to gpg signed manifests — another > commit free with every ebuild commit! The Manifest commit is done anyway, whether your GPG signature is added or not. jer
Re: [gentoo-dev] Ohloh statistics updated
On 07/25/2011 12:59 PM, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: > On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 11:00 PM, Jeroen Roovers wrote: >> On Fri, 22 Jul 2011 15:11:43 +0200 >> Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote: >> >>> So go claim your commits, >> >> Great work! >> >>> [1] https://www.ohloh.net/p/gentoo >>> [2] >>> http://git-exp.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=exp/gentoo-x86.git;a=summary >> >> It appears they count rather more commits than does CIA - Manifest >> commits look to be the likely cause. >> > > Another reason for all of us to move to gpg signed manifests — another > commit free with every ebuild commit! Well, even without the signing step, the Manifest has to be committed separately because the cvs $Header thing causes the ebuild digest to change as soon as it is committed. -- Thanks, Zac
Re: [gentoo-dev] Ohloh statistics updated
On Mon, 25 Jul 2011 15:04:27 -0700 Zac Medico wrote: > On 07/25/2011 12:59 PM, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 11:00 PM, Jeroen Roovers > > wrote: > >> On Fri, 22 Jul 2011 15:11:43 +0200 > >> Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote: > >> > >>> So go claim your commits, > >> > >> Great work! > >> > >>> [1] https://www.ohloh.net/p/gentoo > >>> [2] > >>> http://git-exp.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=exp/gentoo-x86.git;a=summary > >> > >> It appears they count rather more commits than does CIA - Manifest > >> commits look to be the likely cause. > >> > > > > Another reason for all of us to move to gpg signed manifests — > > another commit free with every ebuild commit! > > Well, even without the signing step, the Manifest has to be committed > separately because the cvs $Header thing causes the ebuild digest to > change as soon as it is committed. But signing quite often implies typing in password, especially if it's the first signature done in the session. That means more delay, and thus more likely for the commit to be taken as a separate one. -- Best regards, Michał Górny signature.asc Description: PGP signature
