Re: [gentoo-dev] meaning of sqlite/sqlite3 use flag
On Fri, 14 Sep 2007 19:18:29 +0200 Hanno Böck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I noticed that the sqlite/sqlite3-useflags have no consistent meaning > in the tree. Python uses USE="sqlite" to install basically pysqlite3.. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
[gentoo-dev] Unpermitted distribution of Gentoo shirts and mugs?
User posted me today these: http://www.spreadshirt.net/shop.php?article_id=2219416&view_id=235 http://www.spreadshirt.net/shop.php?op=article&article_id=311913&p=1 Seems they are making money with products that has Gentoo or Gentoo Linux in them, including our logo. Is that legal? - drac -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in eclass: xemacs-elisp-common.eclass xemacs-elisp.eclass
Just a couple comments on this ...
On 07:19 Sat 15 Sep , Hans de Graaff (graaff) wrote:
> SITEPACKAGE=/usr/lib/xemacs/site-packages
Is using get_libdir() a concern here?
> xemacs-elisp-compile () {
> ${XEMACS_BATCH_CLEAN} -f batch-byte-compile "$@"
> xemacs-elisp-make-autoload-file "$@"
> }
> xemacs-elisp-install () {
> local subdir="$1"
> shift
> ( # use sub-shell to avoid possible environment polution
> dodir "${SITEPACKAGE}"/lisp/"${subdir}"
> insinto "${SITEPACKAGE}"/lisp/"${subdir}"
> doins "$@"
> ) || die "Installing lisp files failed"
> }
The lack of parallels between these two functions bothers me. One dies
and the other doesn't, which makes later code using them look wrong. It would
be neater to die in both of these functions.
Also, try using { } around a block of code instead of ( ), which creates
a subshell.
> xemacs-elisp_src_compile() {
> xemacs-elisp-compile *.el || die "Compilation of lisp files failed"
> }
>
> xemacs-elisp_src_install () {
> xemacs-elisp-install "${PN}" *.el *.elc
> }
Here's the funny-looking bit.
Thanks,
Donnie
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
[gentoo-dev] Re: Unpermitted distribution of Gentoo shirts and mugs?
On Sat, 15 Sep 2007 11:58:27 +0300 Samuli Suominen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > User posted me today these: > > http://www.spreadshirt.net/shop.php?article_id=2219416&view_id=235 > http://www.spreadshirt.net/shop.php?op=article&article_id=311913&p=1 > > Seems they are making money with products that has Gentoo or Gentoo > Linux in them, including our logo. > > Is that legal? > > - drac http://www.cafepress.com/buy/gentoo/-/cfpt2_/copt_/cfpt_/source_searchBox/x_0/y_0 ?! -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Re: [gentoo-dev] Unpermitted distribution of Gentoo shirts and mugs?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Samuli Suominen schrieb: > User posted me today these: > > http://www.spreadshirt.net/shop.php?article_id=2219416&view_id=235 > http://www.spreadshirt.net/shop.php?op=article&article_id=311913&p=1 > > Seems they are making money with products that has Gentoo or Gentoo > Linux in them, including our logo. > > Is that legal? > > - drac This is the shop of gentoo.de which holds the trademark in Germany :) So this should be ok :) - -- Necoro -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFG66Gh4UOg/zhYFuARAjTYAJwLylyTZZL08tb+tZ0lFkwXO6EuVwCfdUHp uj7hm/QH5yxkbP+vH91l35U= =z+mY -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Re: [gentoo-dev] Unpermitted distribution of Gentoo shirts and mugs?
On Saturday 15 Sep 2007, René 'Necoro' Neumann wrote: > This is the shop of gentoo.de which holds the trademark in Germany :) So > this should be ok :) Can someone confirm? -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in eclass: xemacs-elisp-common.eclass xemacs-elisp.eclass
On Saturday 15 September 2007, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> On 07:19 Sat 15 Sep , Hans de Graaff (graaff) wrote:
> > SITEPACKAGE=/usr/lib/xemacs/site-packages
>
> Is using get_libdir() a concern here?
looks it to me
> > xemacs-elisp-compile () {
> > ${XEMACS_BATCH_CLEAN} -f batch-byte-compile "$@"
> > xemacs-elisp-make-autoload-file "$@"
> > }
> >
> > xemacs-elisp-install () {
> > local subdir="$1"
> > shift
> > ( # use sub-shell to avoid possible environment polution
> > dodir "${SITEPACKAGE}"/lisp/"${subdir}"
> > insinto "${SITEPACKAGE}"/lisp/"${subdir}"
> > doins "$@"
> > ) || die "Installing lisp files failed"
> > }
>
> The lack of parallels between these two functions bothers me. One dies
> and the other doesn't, which makes later code using them look wrong. It
> would be neater to die in both of these functions.
>
> Also, try using { } around a block of code instead of ( ), which creates
> a subshell.
erm, what ? () is a subshell, {} is a list of grouped commands ...
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Unpermitted distribution of Gentoo shirts and mugs?
On Saturday, 15. September 2007, Samuli Suominen wrote: > > Is that legal? > > > > - drac > > http://www.cafepress.com/buy/gentoo/-/cfpt2_/copt_/cfpt_/source_searc >hBox/x_0/y_0 CafePress is the official gentoo.org store, see: http://www.cafepress.com/officialgentoo/ I guess that includes our stuff popping up in their search results. Also, I believe -dev is not the appropriate place for this (project ftw!). Regards, Robert signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
[gentoo-dev] Last rites: mail-mta/qmail-mysql
Hi all, mail-mta/qmail-mysql is going to be removed in 14 days. Bug #20899 Regards, Bene -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in eclass: xemacs-elisp-common.eclass xemacs-elisp.eclass
On Sat, 2007-09-15 at 05:56 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Saturday 15 September 2007, Donnie Berkholz wrote: > > On 07:19 Sat 15 Sep , Hans de Graaff (graaff) wrote: > > > SITEPACKAGE=/usr/lib/xemacs/site-packages > > > > Is using get_libdir() a concern here? > > looks it to me Not really, because all the code that gets installed through the eclasses is byte-compiled elisp, which should be arch-independent. And yes, this should really be moved to /usr/share instead for that reason. Upstream just committed changes for that to their CVS, and it is on my to do list to work out a migration scheme. Thanks everyone for the feedback! Kind regards, Hans signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: mail-mta/qmail-mysql
Benedikt Boehm kirjoitti: > Hi all, > > mail-mta/qmail-mysql is going to be removed in 14 days. Bug #20899 > > Regards, > Bene https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20899 I don't see anything in that bug that would warrant deviating from the normal 30 days. Regards, Petteri signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in eclass: xemacs-elisp-common.eclass xemacs-elisp.eclass
On Saturday 15 September 2007, Hans de Graaff wrote: > On Sat, 2007-09-15 at 05:56 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On Saturday 15 September 2007, Donnie Berkholz wrote: > > > On 07:19 Sat 15 Sep , Hans de Graaff (graaff) wrote: > > > > SITEPACKAGE=/usr/lib/xemacs/site-packages > > > > > > Is using get_libdir() a concern here? > > > > looks it to me > > Not really, because all the code that gets installed through the > eclasses is byte-compiled elisp, which should be arch-independent. > > And yes, this should really be moved to /usr/share instead for that > reason. Upstream just committed changes for that to their CVS, and it is > on my to do list to work out a migration scheme. sounds like a good reason to overlook /usr/lib/ abuse then -mike signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: mail-mta/qmail-mysql
On Sat, 15 Sep 2007 14:17:24 +0300 Petteri Räty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Benedikt Boehm kirjoitti: > > Hi all, > > > > mail-mta/qmail-mysql is going to be removed in 14 days. Bug #20899 > > > > Regards, > > Bene > > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20899 > > I don't see anything in that bug that would warrant deviating from the > normal 30 days. > > Regards, > Petteri > oh please. i don't care... -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: mail-mta/qmail-mysql
Benedikt Boehm kirjoitti: > On Sat, 15 Sep 2007 14:17:24 +0300 > Petteri Räty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Benedikt Boehm kirjoitti: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> mail-mta/qmail-mysql is going to be removed in 14 days. Bug #20899 >>> >>> Regards, >>> Bene >> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20899 >> >> I don't see anything in that bug that would warrant deviating from the >> normal 30 days. >> >> Regards, >> Petteri >> > > oh please. i don't care... about users? Regards, Petteri signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] Unpermitted distribution of Gentoo shirts and mugs?
On Sat, 2007-09-15 at 11:58 +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote: > > Is that legal? All legal questions should *always* be directed to the trustees. To put it simply, anyone selling anything with a Gentoo logo on it is breaking the law, unless they are selling a Gentoo Linux CD. In other words, the only allowed commercial usage is when talking *about* Gentoo. The Friends of Gentoo e.V. have said repeatedly that they have some agreement with the Foundation. As a trustee, I never saw any such evidence. Any licenses given out by the Foundation for usage of our logos and name would need to be done in writing to have even the slightest chance of being legal. If they have documentation, I would like to see it. As for Cafepress and such, I check it every so often and report anyone using our logos and they take them down. I have a couple places on my radar, I just haven't gotten all of the paperwork finished and sent in. -- Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering Strategic Lead Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams Games Developer/Council Member/Foundation Trustee Gentoo Foundation signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Unpermitted distribution of Gentoo shirts and mugs?
On Sat, 2007-09-15 at 12:22 +0200, Robert Buchholz wrote: > Also, I believe -dev is not the appropriate place for this (project > ftw!). Ehh... no... gentoo-nfp is where things involving our legal entity belongs. This sort of thread 100% absolutely does *not* belong on this list, nor project. -- Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering Strategic Lead Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams Games Developer/Council Member/Foundation Trustee Gentoo Foundation signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: mail-mta/qmail-mysql
On Sat, 15 Sep 2007 20:48:52 +0300 Petteri Räty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Benedikt Boehm kirjoitti: > > On Sat, 15 Sep 2007 14:17:24 +0300 > > Petteri Räty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> Benedikt Boehm kirjoitti: > >>> Hi all, > >>> > >>> mail-mta/qmail-mysql is going to be removed in 14 days. Bug #20899 > >>> > >>> Regards, > >>> Bene > >> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20899 > >> > >> I don't see anything in that bug that would warrant deviating from > >> the normal 30 days. > >> > >> Regards, > >> Petteri > >> > > > > oh please. i don't care... > > about users? no, i meant if it's 14 or 30 days, or 3 months .. i'm pretty sure i forget to remove it on time anyway > > Regards, > Petteri > -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in eclass: xemacs-elisp-common.eclass xemacs-elisp.eclass
On 05:56 Sat 15 Sep , Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Saturday 15 September 2007, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> > Also, try using { } around a block of code instead of ( ), which creates
> > a subshell.
>
> erm, what ? () is a subshell, {} is a list of grouped commands ...
Right, that's what I said. What's the point of using a subshell here?
That comment about environment pollution didn't make sense to me.
Thanks,
Donnie
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in eclass: xemacs-elisp-common.eclass xemacs-elisp.eclass
On Saturday 15 September 2007, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> On 05:56 Sat 15 Sep , Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Saturday 15 September 2007, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> > > Also, try using { } around a block of code instead of ( ), which
> > > creates a subshell.
> >
> > erm, what ? () is a subshell, {} is a list of grouped commands ...
>
> Right, that's what I said. What's the point of using a subshell here?
> That comment about environment pollution didn't make sense to me.
the "into" part pollutes the environment
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in eclass: xemacs-elisp-common.eclass xemacs-elisp.eclass
On 16:52 Sat 15 Sep , Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Saturday 15 September 2007, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> > On 05:56 Sat 15 Sep , Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > On Saturday 15 September 2007, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> > > > Also, try using { } around a block of code instead of ( ), which
> > > > creates a subshell.
> > >
> > > erm, what ? () is a subshell, {} is a list of grouped commands ...
> >
> > Right, that's what I said. What's the point of using a subshell here?
> > That comment about environment pollution didn't make sense to me.
>
> the "into" part pollutes the environment
> -mike
One insinto definitely doesn't qualify as pollution to me. Mild
littering, perhaps. But with a subshell, it's only a matter of time
before something weird happens, like trying to put a die() in there.
Thanks,
Donnie
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in eclass: xemacs-elisp-common.eclass xemacs-elisp.eclass
On Saturday 15 September 2007, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> On 16:52 Sat 15 Sep , Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Saturday 15 September 2007, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> > > On 05:56 Sat 15 Sep , Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > > On Saturday 15 September 2007, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> > > > > Also, try using { } around a block of code instead of ( ), which
> > > > > creates a subshell.
> > > >
> > > > erm, what ? () is a subshell, {} is a list of grouped commands ...
> > >
> > > Right, that's what I said. What's the point of using a subshell here?
> > > That comment about environment pollution didn't make sense to me.
> >
> > the "into" part pollutes the environment
>
> One insinto definitely doesn't qualify as pollution to me. Mild
> littering, perhaps. But with a subshell, it's only a matter of time
> before something weird happens, like trying to put a die() in there.
i dont use the eclass so it doesnt matter to me, but it does modify the
environment in possibly unexpected ways for the caller
for do* funcs this is a must, for other funcs it's up to the maintainers
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: mail-mta/qmail-mysql
Benedikt Boehm kirjoitti: > On Sat, 15 Sep 2007 20:48:52 +0300 > Petteri Räty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Benedikt Boehm kirjoitti: >>> On Sat, 15 Sep 2007 14:17:24 +0300 >>> Petteri Räty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Benedikt Boehm kirjoitti: > Hi all, > > mail-mta/qmail-mysql is going to be removed in 14 days. Bug #20899 > > Regards, > Bene https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20899 I don't see anything in that bug that would warrant deviating from the normal 30 days. Regards, Petteri >>> oh please. i don't care... >> about users? > > no, i meant if it's 14 or 30 days, or 3 months .. i'm pretty sure i > forget to remove it on time anyway > >> Regards, >> Petteri >> The delay in removal is for the benefit of the users. Regards, Petteri signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in eclass: font.eclass
On 02:20 Sun 16 Sep , Ryan Hill (dirtyepic) wrote:
> dirtyepic07/09/16 02:20:05
>
> Modified: font.eclass
> Log:
> Forgot to remove -v flag from chmod.
> @@ -85,7 +85,7 @@
> for suffix in ${FONT_SUFFIX}; do
> doins *.${suffix}
> # ensure fonts are world readable to prevent fontconfig
> segfaults
> - chmod -v 0644 ${D}${FONTDIR}/*.${suffix}
> + chmod 0644 ${D}${FONTDIR}/*.${suffix}
I think it'd be a good idea to put that back in. No harm, and it could
help with any bug reports. The '-c' option might be even better if it's
portable.
Thanks,
Donnie
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in eclass: font.eclass
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> On 02:20 Sun 16 Sep , Ryan Hill (dirtyepic) wrote:
>> dirtyepic07/09/16 02:20:05
>>
>> Modified: font.eclass
>> Log:
>> Forgot to remove -v flag from chmod.
>
>> @@ -85,7 +85,7 @@
>> for suffix in ${FONT_SUFFIX}; do
>> doins *.${suffix}
>> # ensure fonts are world readable to prevent fontconfig
>> segfaults
>> -chmod -v 0644 ${D}${FONTDIR}/*.${suffix}
>> +chmod 0644 ${D}${FONTDIR}/*.${suffix}
>
> I think it'd be a good idea to put that back in. No harm, and it could
> help with any bug reports. The '-c' option might be even better if it's
> portable.
Actually I wonder if I even need the chmod at all. doins should default to
0644. The permission problem might come from ebuilds that don't use the eclass
and do their own make install, or user-installed fonts.
--
fonts / wxWindows / gcc-porting / treecleaners
9B81 6C9F E791 83BB 3AB3 5B2D E625 A073 8379 37E8 (0x837937E8)
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
