[Bug rust/114629] rust-ast-resolve-expr contains bloated code for funny_error
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114629 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added CC||iains at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4 from Iain Sandoe --- since humour does not always translate - even between en_GB and en_US in some cases... I wonder if the better solution in the case of something that is clearly intended to be humour (which is subjective as per the comments here) is to leave the text in the original language (perhaps with surrounding quotation marks correct for the target language). That way if the (end user) reading the diagnostic can understand the original language the joke should stand. It seems a bit unreasonable to expect translators to find an equivalent joke in the target language (transliteration is not likely to work in most cases). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug rust/114629] rust-ast-resolve-expr contains bloated code for funny_error
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114629 --- Comment #8 from Iain Sandoe --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #5) > (In reply to Pierre-Emmanuel Patry from comment #2) > While you are at it, it would be useful to add a link to the rust langauge > specification (like there is for almost all other languages [I see > objective-C is not listed]) to https://gcc.gnu.org/readings.html . This is getting a bit off-topic for the current PR - but, for the record, I am not aware of any formal spec for Objective-C/C++ - the API is described in Apple's developer documentation and compliance is assessed (at least by me) in terms of "do we implement the things that we claim, in the same way as the system compiler"? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
