Regressions on native/releases/gcc-14 at commit r14-11443 vs commit r14-11442 on Linux/x86_64

2025-03-24 Thread Haochen Jiang via Gcc-regression
Regressions on releases/gcc-14 at commit r14-11443 vs commit r14-11442 on 
Linux/x86_64
New failures:
FAIL: c-c++-common/tsan/free_race.c   -O0  output pattern test
FAIL: c-c++-common/tsan/mutexset1.c   -O0  output pattern test
FAIL: c-c++-common/tsan/mutexset1.c   -O2  output pattern test
FAIL: c-c++-common/tsan/pr65400-1.c   -O2  output pattern test
FAIL: c-c++-common/tsan/pr65400-3.c   -O0  output pattern test
FAIL: c-c++-common/tsan/pr65400-3.c   -O2  output pattern test
FAIL: c-c++-common/tsan/pr65400-3.c   -O2  output pattern test
FAIL: c-c++-common/tsan/pr68260.c   -O2  execution test
FAIL: c-c++-common/tsan/race_on_barrier2.c   -O2  output pattern test
FAIL: c-c++-common/tsan/race_on_barrier.c   -O2  output pattern test
FAIL: c-c++-common/tsan/race_on_mutex.c   -O0  output pattern test
FAIL: c-c++-common/tsan/simple_stack.c   -O0  output pattern test
FAIL: c-c++-common/tsan/simple_stack.c   -O2  output pattern test
FAIL: c-c++-common/tsan/thread_leak1.c   -O0  output pattern test
FAIL: c-c++-common/tsan/thread_leak1.c   -O2  output pattern test
FAIL: c-c++-common/tsan/thread_leak.c   -O2  execution test

New passes:
FAIL: c-c++-common/tsan/atomic_stack.c   -O2  output pattern test
FAIL: c-c++-common/tsan/fd_pipe_race.c   -O2  output pattern test


Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-15-8649-g1d2257dc850: 1 regressions on arm

2025-03-24 Thread Christophe Lyon via Gcc-regression
On Mon, 24 Mar 2025 at 12:31, Richard Earnshaw (lists) via
Gcc-regression  wrote:
>
> On 21/03/2025 20:36, ci_not...@linaro.org wrote:
> > Dear contributor,
> >
> > Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please 
> > find some details below.
> >
> > In gcc_check master-arm, after:
> >   | commit gcc-15-8649-g1d2257dc850
> >   | Author: Richard Earnshaw 
> >   | Date:   Fri Mar 21 15:20:03 2025 +
> >   |
> >   | arm: testsuite: make unaligned-memcpy-*.c executable tests [PR91614]
> >   |
> >   | These tests have been looking for a very specific instruction 
> > sequence
> >   | which has the tendency to be fairly unstable as a result.  But what 
> > is
> >   | more interesting is that the the tests must not contain instructions
> >   | ... 22 lines of the commit log omitted.
> >
> > Produces 1 regressions:
> >   |
> >   | regressions.sum:
> >   | Running gcc:gcc.target/arm/arm.exp ...
> >   | FAIL: gcc.target/arm/unaligned-memcpy-4.c scan-assembler-not unaligned
>
> Should be fixed now.  The scanner was matching 'unaligned' in a .file 
> directive containing the test name.
>
Indeed, the test passes now.
Thanks for the quick fix!

Christophe

> R.
>
> >
> > Used configuration :
> >  *CI config* tcwg_gcc_check master-arm
> >  *configure and test flags:* none, autodetected on 
> > armv8l-unknown-linux-gnueabihf
> >
> > We track this bug report under 
> > https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1545. Please let us know if you 
> > have a fix.
> >
> > If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on 
> > linaro-toolch...@lists.linaro.org mailing list.
> >
> > -8<--8<--8<--
> >
> > The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to 
> > reproduce a debug environment:
> >
> > You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in
> >  * 
> > https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/3580/artifact/artifacts/00-sumfiles/
> > The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and 
> > make commands are in
> >  * 
> > https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/3580/artifact/artifacts/notify/
> > The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in
> >  * 
> > https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/3580/artifact/artifacts/sumfiles/xfails.xfail
> >
> > Current build   : 
> > https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/3580/artifact/artifacts
> > Reference build : 
> > https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/3579/artifact/artifacts
> >
> > Instruction to reproduce the build : 
> > https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/gcc/sha1/1d2257dc850d088f6d9267b4624ba08533ab2475/tcwg_gcc_check/master-arm/reproduction_instructions.txt
> >
> > Full commit : 
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commitdiff;h=1d2257dc850d088f6d9267b4624ba08533ab2475
>


Regressions on master at commit r15-8717 vs commit r15-8689 on Linux/x86_64

2025-03-24 Thread Haochen Jiang via Gcc-regression
Regressions on master at commit r15-8717 vs commit r15-8689 on Linux/x86_64
New failures:
FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/save-temps c_lto_save-temps_0.o-c_lto_save-temps_0.o link,  -O 
-flto -save-temps

New passes:


Regressions on releases/gcc-13 at commit r13-9448 vs commit r13-9442 on Linux/x86_64

2025-03-24 Thread Haochen Jiang via Gcc-regression
Regressions on releases/gcc-13 at commit r13-9448 vs commit r13-9442 on 
Linux/x86_64
New failures:

New passes:
FAIL: 30_threads/future/members/poll.cc execution test


Regressions on native/releases/gcc-14 at commit r14-11442 vs commit r14-11437 on Linux/x86_64

2025-03-24 Thread Haochen Jiang via Gcc-regression
Regressions on releases/gcc-14 at commit r14-11442 vs commit r14-11437 on 
Linux/x86_64
New failures:
FAIL: c-c++-common/tsan/atomic_stack.c   -O2  output pattern test
FAIL: c-c++-common/tsan/bitfield_race.c   -O0  output pattern test
FAIL: c-c++-common/tsan/bitfield_race.c   -O2  output pattern test
FAIL: c-c++-common/tsan/fd_pipe_race.c   -O0  output pattern test
FAIL: c-c++-common/tsan/fd_pipe_race.c   -O2  output pattern test
FAIL: c-c++-common/tsan/free_race2.c   -O2  output pattern test
FAIL: c-c++-common/tsan/free_race.c   -O2  output pattern test
FAIL: c-c++-common/tsan/mutexset1.c   -O2  output pattern test
FAIL: c-c++-common/tsan/pr65400-1.c   -O2  output pattern test
FAIL: c-c++-common/tsan/pr68260.c   -O0  execution test
FAIL: c-c++-common/tsan/race_on_barrier.c   -O0  output pattern test

New passes:
FAIL: c-c++-common/tsan/simple_race.c   -O2  output pattern test
FAIL: c-c++-common/tsan/simple_stack.c   -O0  output pattern test


Regressions on native/releases/gcc-13 at commit r13-9448 vs commit r13-9442 on Linux/x86_64

2025-03-24 Thread Haochen Jiang via Gcc-regression
Regressions on releases/gcc-13 at commit r13-9448 vs commit r13-9442 on 
Linux/x86_64
New failures:
FAIL: c-c++-common/tsan/simple_race.c   -O0  output pattern test
FAIL: c-c++-common/tsan/simple_race.c   -O2  output pattern test
FAIL: c-c++-common/tsan/simple_stack.c   -O0  output pattern test
FAIL: c-c++-common/tsan/simple_stack.c   -O2  output pattern test
FAIL: c-c++-common/tsan/thread_leak1.c   -O0  output pattern test
FAIL: c-c++-common/tsan/thread_leak1.c   -O2  output pattern test
FAIL: c-c++-common/tsan/thread_leak2.c   -O0  output pattern test
FAIL: c-c++-common/tsan/thread_leak.c   -O0  execution test
FAIL: c-c++-common/tsan/thread_leak.c   -O2  execution test
FAIL: c-c++-common/tsan/tiny_race.c   -O0  output pattern test
FAIL: c-c++-common/tsan/tiny_race.c   -O2  output pattern test
FAIL: c-c++-common/tsan/tls_race.c   -O0  output pattern test
FAIL: c-c++-common/tsan/tls_race.c   -O2  output pattern test
FAIL: g++.dg/tsan/pr64265.C   -O0  output pattern test
FAIL: g++.dg/tsan/pr64265.C   -O2  output pattern test
FAIL: g++.dg/tsan/vptr_benign_race.C   -O2  execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/tsan/vptr_harmful_race.C   -O0  output pattern test
FAIL: g++.dg/tsan/vptr_harmful_race.C   -O2  output pattern test

New passes:
FAIL: c-c++-common/tsan/atomic_stack.c   -O0  output pattern test
FAIL: c-c++-common/tsan/atomic_stack.c   -O2  output pattern test
FAIL: c-c++-common/tsan/bitfield_race.c   -O0  output pattern test
FAIL: c-c++-common/tsan/bitfield_race.c   -O2  output pattern test
FAIL: c-c++-common/tsan/fd_pipe_race.c   -O0  output pattern test
FAIL: c-c++-common/tsan/fd_pipe_race.c   -O2  output pattern test
FAIL: c-c++-common/tsan/free_race2.c   -O0  output pattern test
FAIL: c-c++-common/tsan/free_race2.c   -O2  output pattern test
FAIL: c-c++-common/tsan/free_race.c   -O0  output pattern test
FAIL: c-c++-common/tsan/free_race.c   -O2  output pattern test
FAIL: c-c++-common/tsan/mutexset1.c   -O0  output pattern test
FAIL: c-c++-common/tsan/mutexset1.c   -O2  output pattern test
FAIL: c-c++-common/tsan/pr65400-1.c   -O0  output pattern test
FAIL: c-c++-common/tsan/pr65400-1.c   -O2  output pattern test


Regressions on master at commit r15-8721 vs commit r15-8717 on Linux/x86_64

2025-03-24 Thread Haochen Jiang via Gcc-regression
Regressions on master at commit r15-8721 vs commit r15-8717 on Linux/x86_64
New failures:

New passes:
FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/save-temps c_lto_save-temps_0.o-c_lto_save-temps_0.o link,  -O 
-flto -save-temps


Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-15-8649-g1d2257dc850: 1 regressions on arm

2025-03-24 Thread Richard Earnshaw (lists) via Gcc-regression
On 21/03/2025 20:36, ci_not...@linaro.org wrote:
> Dear contributor,
> 
> Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find 
> some details below.
> 
> In gcc_check master-arm, after:
>   | commit gcc-15-8649-g1d2257dc850
>   | Author: Richard Earnshaw 
>   | Date:   Fri Mar 21 15:20:03 2025 +
>   | 
>   | arm: testsuite: make unaligned-memcpy-*.c executable tests [PR91614]
>   | 
>   | These tests have been looking for a very specific instruction sequence
>   | which has the tendency to be fairly unstable as a result.  But what is
>   | more interesting is that the the tests must not contain instructions
>   | ... 22 lines of the commit log omitted.
> 
> Produces 1 regressions:
>   | 
>   | regressions.sum:
>   | Running gcc:gcc.target/arm/arm.exp ...
>   | FAIL: gcc.target/arm/unaligned-memcpy-4.c scan-assembler-not unaligned

Should be fixed now.  The scanner was matching 'unaligned' in a .file directive 
containing the test name.

R.

> 
> Used configuration :
>  *CI config* tcwg_gcc_check master-arm
>  *configure and test flags:* none, autodetected on 
> armv8l-unknown-linux-gnueabihf
> 
> We track this bug report under https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1545. 
> Please let us know if you have a fix.
> 
> If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on 
> linaro-toolch...@lists.linaro.org mailing list.
> 
> -8<--8<--8<--
> 
> The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to 
> reproduce a debug environment:
> 
> You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in
>  * 
> https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/3580/artifact/artifacts/00-sumfiles/
> The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make 
> commands are in
>  * 
> https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/3580/artifact/artifacts/notify/
> The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in
>  * 
> https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/3580/artifact/artifacts/sumfiles/xfails.xfail
> 
> Current build   : 
> https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/3580/artifact/artifacts
> Reference build : 
> https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/3579/artifact/artifacts
> 
> Instruction to reproduce the build : 
> https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/gcc/sha1/1d2257dc850d088f6d9267b4624ba08533ab2475/tcwg_gcc_check/master-arm/reproduction_instructions.txt
> 
> Full commit : 
> https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commitdiff;h=1d2257dc850d088f6d9267b4624ba08533ab2475