Regressions on master at commit r15-5329 vs commit r15-5326 on Linux/i686

2024-11-15 Thread Haochen Jiang via Gcc-regression
Regressions on master at commit r15-5329 vs commit r15-5326 on Linux/i686
New failures:
FAIL: gcc.dg/graphite/id-15.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/graphite/pr38413.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/graphite/pr38510.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr66891.c (test for excess errors)

New passes:
FAIL: tsprintf


[Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-15-5255-g7828dc070510: 33 regressions on arm

2024-11-15 Thread ci_notify--- via Gcc-regression
Dear contributor,

Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find 
some details below.

In  master-arm, after:
  | commit gcc-15-5255-g7828dc070510
  | Author: Jan Hubicka 
  | Date:   Thu Nov 14 17:01:12 2024 +0100
  | 
  | Remove allocations which are used only for NULL pointer check and free
  | 
  | Extend tree-ssa-dse to remove memory allocations that are used only
  | to check that return value is non-NULL and freed.
  | 
  | ... 42 lines of the commit log omitted.

Produces 33 regressions:
  | Running glibc:malloc ...
  | FAIL: malloc/tst-aligned-alloc 
  | FAIL: malloc/tst-aligned-alloc-malloc-check 
  | FAIL: malloc/tst-aligned-alloc-malloc-hugetlb1 
  | FAIL: malloc/tst-aligned-alloc-malloc-hugetlb2 
  | ... and 29 more

Used configuration :
 *CI config* tcwg_gnu_native_check_glibc master-arm
 *configure and test flags:* --target arm-linux-gnueabihf

We track this bug report under https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1422. 
Please let us know if you have a fix.

If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on 
linaro-toolch...@lists.linaro.org mailing list.

-8<--8<--8<--

The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to 
reproduce a debug environment:

You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in
 * 
https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_native_check_glibc--master-arm-build/910/artifact/artifacts/00-sumfiles/
The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make 
commands are in
 * 
https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_native_check_glibc--master-arm-build/910/artifact/artifacts/notify/
The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in
 * 
https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_native_check_glibc--master-arm-build/910/artifact/artifacts/sumfiles/xfails.xfail

Current build   : 
https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_native_check_glibc--master-arm-build/910/artifact/artifacts
Reference build : 
https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_native_check_glibc--master-arm-build/909/artifact/artifacts

Instruction to reproduce the build : 
https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/gcc/sha1/7828dc070510f8f5c06765858815fa6e5d2d1ec6/tcwg_gnu_native_check_glibc/master-arm/reproduction_instructions.txt

Full commit : 
https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commitdiff;h=7828dc070510f8f5c06765858815fa6e5d2d1ec6


Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-15-5255-g7828dc070510: 33 regressions on arm

2024-11-15 Thread Sam James via Gcc-regression
This is https://sourceware.org/PR32366.


[r15-5324 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr117093.c (test for excess errors) on Linux/x86_64

2024-11-15 Thread haochen.jiang via Gcc-regression
On Linux/x86_64,

c83e2d47574fd9a21f257e0f0d7e350c3f1b0618 is the first bad commit
commit c83e2d47574fd9a21f257e0f0d7e350c3f1b0618
Author: Jennifer Schmitz 
Date:   Mon Nov 4 07:56:09 2024 -0800

match.pd: Fold vec_perm with view_convert

caused

FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr117093.c (test for excess errors)

with GCC configured with

../../gcc/configure 
--prefix=/export/users/haochenj/src/gcc-bisect/master/master/r15-5324/usr 
--enable-clocale=gnu --with-system-zlib --with-demangler-in-ld 
--with-fpmath=sse --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran --enable-cet --without-isl 
--enable-libmpx x86_64-linux --disable-bootstrap

To reproduce:

$ cd {build_dir}/gcc && make check 
RUNTESTFLAGS="tree-ssa.exp=gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr117093.c 
--target_board='unix{-m32}'"
$ cd {build_dir}/gcc && make check 
RUNTESTFLAGS="tree-ssa.exp=gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr117093.c 
--target_board='unix{-m32\ -march=cascadelake}'"
$ cd {build_dir}/gcc && make check 
RUNTESTFLAGS="tree-ssa.exp=gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr117093.c 
--target_board='unix{-m64}'"
$ cd {build_dir}/gcc && make check 
RUNTESTFLAGS="tree-ssa.exp=gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr117093.c 
--target_board='unix{-m64\ -march=cascadelake}'"

(Please do not reply to this email, for question about this report, contact me 
at haochen dot jiang at intel.com.)
(If you met problems with cascadelake related, disabling AVX512F in command 
line might save that.)
(However, please make sure that there is no potential problems with AVX512.)


[Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-15-5324-gc83e2d47574f: 1 regressions on arm

2024-11-15 Thread ci_notify--- via Gcc-regression
Dear contributor,

Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find 
some details below.

In gcc_check master-arm, after:
  | commit gcc-15-5324-gc83e2d47574f
  | Author: Jennifer Schmitz 
  | Date:   Mon Nov 4 07:56:09 2024 -0800
  | 
  | match.pd: Fold vec_perm with view_convert
  | 
  | This patch improves the codegen for the following test case:
  | uint64x2_t foo (uint64x2_t r) {
  | uint32x4_t a = vreinterpretq_u32_u64 (r);
  | ... 40 lines of the commit log omitted.

Produces 1 regressions:
  | Running gcc:gcc.dg/tree-ssa/tree-ssa.exp ...
  | FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr117093.c check-function-bodies foo

Used configuration :
 *CI config* tcwg_gcc_check master-arm
 *configure and test flags:* --target arm-linux-gnueabihf

We track this bug report under https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1423. 
Please let us know if you have a fix.

If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on 
linaro-toolch...@lists.linaro.org mailing list.

-8<--8<--8<--

The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to 
reproduce a debug environment:

You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in
 * 
https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/3023/artifact/artifacts/00-sumfiles/
The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make 
commands are in
 * 
https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/3023/artifact/artifacts/notify/
The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in
 * 
https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/3023/artifact/artifacts/sumfiles/xfails.xfail

Current build   : 
https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/3023/artifact/artifacts
Reference build : 
https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/3021/artifact/artifacts

Instruction to reproduce the build : 
https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/gcc/sha1/c83e2d47574fd9a21f257e0f0d7e350c3f1b0618/tcwg_gcc_check/master-arm/reproduction_instructions.txt

Full commit : 
https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commitdiff;h=c83e2d47574fd9a21f257e0f0d7e350c3f1b0618


Regressions on native/master at commit r15-5329 vs commit r15-5326 on Linux/x86_64

2024-11-15 Thread Haochen Jiang via Gcc-regression
Regressions on master at commit r15-5329 vs commit r15-5326 on Linux/x86_64
New failures:
FAIL: gcc.dg/graphite/id-15.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/graphite/id-15.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/graphite/pr38413.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/graphite/pr38413.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/graphite/pr38510.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/graphite/pr38510.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr66891.c (test for excess errors)

New passes:


Regressions on releases/gcc-13 at commit r13-9193 vs commit r13-9190 on Linux/x86_64

2024-11-15 Thread Haochen Jiang via Gcc-regression
Regressions on releases/gcc-13 at commit r13-9193 vs commit r13-9190 on 
Linux/x86_64
New failures:
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-bic-bitmask-10.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects (test for 
excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-bic-bitmask-11.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects (test for 
excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-bic-bitmask-2.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects (test for excess 
errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-bic-bitmask-3.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects (test for excess 
errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-bic-bitmask-4.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects (test for excess 
errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-bic-bitmask-5.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects (test for excess 
errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-bic-bitmask-6.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects (test for excess 
errors)

New passes:


Regressions on native/releases/gcc-13 at commit r13-9193 vs commit r13-9190 on Linux/x86_64

2024-11-15 Thread Haochen Jiang via Gcc-regression
Regressions on releases/gcc-13 at commit r13-9193 vs commit r13-9190 on 
Linux/x86_64
New failures:
FAIL: c-c++-common/tsan/mutexset1.c   -O0  output pattern test
FAIL: c-c++-common/tsan/mutexset1.c   -O2  output pattern test
FAIL: c-c++-common/tsan/pr65400-1.c   -O0  output pattern test
FAIL: c-c++-common/tsan/pr65400-3.c   -O0  output pattern test
FAIL: c-c++-common/tsan/pr65400-3.c   -O2  output pattern test
FAIL: c-c++-common/tsan/pr68260.c   -O0  execution test
FAIL: c-c++-common/tsan/pr68260.c   -O2  execution test
FAIL: c-c++-common/tsan/race_on_barrier.c   -O0  output pattern test
FAIL: c-c++-common/tsan/race_on_barrier.c   -O2  output pattern test
FAIL: g++.dg/tsan/pthread_cond_clockwait.C   -O2  execution test

New passes:


Regressions on master at commit r15-5324 vs commit r15-5323 on Linux/x86_64

2024-11-15 Thread Haochen Jiang via Gcc-regression
Regressions on master at commit r15-5324 vs commit r15-5323 on Linux/x86_64
New failures:
FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr117093.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr117093.c (test for excess errors)

New passes:


Regressions on master at commit r15-5324 vs commit r15-5322 on Linux/i686

2024-11-15 Thread Haochen Jiang via Gcc-regression
Regressions on master at commit r15-5324 vs commit r15-5322 on Linux/i686
New failures:
FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr117093.c (test for excess errors)

New passes:


Regressions on native/master at commit r15-5324 vs commit r15-5323 on Linux/x86_64

2024-11-15 Thread Haochen Jiang via Gcc-regression
Regressions on master at commit r15-5324 vs commit r15-5323 on Linux/x86_64
New failures:
FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr117093.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr117093.c (test for excess errors)

New passes:


[Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-15-5327-g55e3bd376b2: Failure on arm

2024-11-15 Thread ci_notify--- via Gcc-regression
Dear contributor,

Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find 
some details below.

In gcc_build master-arm, after:
  | commit gcc-15-5327-g55e3bd376b2
  | Author: Joseph Myers 
  | Date:   Fri Nov 15 23:42:59 2024 +
  | 
  | c: Default to -std=gnu23
  | 
  | Change the default language version for C compilation from -std=gnu17
  | to -std=gnu23.  A few tests are updated to remove local definitions of
  | bool, true and false (where making such an unconditional test change
  | ... 52 lines of the commit log omitted.

Produces Failure:
  | Results changed to
  | # reset_artifacts:
  | -10
  | # true:
  | 0
  | # build_abe gcc:
  | # FAILED
  | # First few build errors in logs:
  | # 00:03:13 
/home/tcwg-buildslave/workspace/tcwg_gnu_2/abe/snapshots/gcc.git~master/libgcc/config/arm/linux-atomic.c:252:23:
 error: two or more data types in declaration specifiers
  | # 00:03:13 make[2]: *** 
[/home/tcwg-buildslave/workspace/tcwg_gnu_2/abe/snapshots/gcc.git~master/libgcc/shared-object.mk:14:
 linux-atomic.o] Error 1
  | # 00:03:13 make[1]: *** [Makefile:14340: all-target-libgcc] Error 2
  | # 00:03:13 make: *** [Makefile:1062: all] Error 2
  | 
  | From
  | # reset_artifacts:
  | -10
  | # true:
  | 0
  | # build_abe gcc:
  | 1

Used configuration :
 *CI config* tcwg_gcc_build master-arm
 *configure and test flags:* --target arm-linux-gnueabihf

We track this bug report under https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1424. 
Please let us know if you have a fix.

If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on 
linaro-toolch...@lists.linaro.org mailing list.

-8<--8<--8<--

The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to 
reproduce a debug environment:

You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in
 * 
https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_build--master-arm-build/2835/artifact/artifacts/00-sumfiles/
The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make 
commands are in
 * 
https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_build--master-arm-build/2835/artifact/artifacts/notify/
The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in
 * 
https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_build--master-arm-build/2835/artifact/artifacts/sumfiles/xfails.xfail

Current build   : 
https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_build--master-arm-build/2835/artifact/artifacts
Reference build : 
https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_build--master-arm-build/2834/artifact/artifacts

Instruction to reproduce the build : 
https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/gcc/sha1/55e3bd376b2214e200fa76d12b67ff259b06c212/tcwg_gcc_build/master-arm/reproduction_instructions.txt

Full commit : 
https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commitdiff;h=55e3bd376b2214e200fa76d12b67ff259b06c212


Regressions on master at commit r15-5333 vs commit r15-5330 on Linux/i686

2024-11-15 Thread Haochen Jiang via Gcc-regression
Regressions on master at commit r15-5333 vs commit r15-5330 on Linux/i686
New failures:

New passes:
FAIL: gcc.dg/graphite/id-15.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/graphite/pr38413.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/graphite/pr38510.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr66891.c (test for excess errors)


Regressions on master at commit r15-5327 vs commit r15-5326 on Linux/x86_64

2024-11-15 Thread Haochen Jiang via Gcc-regression
Regressions on master at commit r15-5327 vs commit r15-5326 on Linux/x86_64
New failures:
FAIL: gcc.dg/graphite/id-15.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/graphite/id-15.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/graphite/pr38413.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/graphite/pr38413.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/graphite/pr38510.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/graphite/pr38510.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr66891.c (test for excess errors)

New passes:
FAIL: tsprintf