Regressions on master at commit r15-4379 vs commit r15-4377 on Linux/x86_64

2024-10-16 Thread Haochen Jiang via Gcc-regression 
Regressions on master at commit r15-4379 vs commit r15-4377 on Linux/x86_64
New failures:
FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/convert-dfp-2.c   -O2 -flto -fuse-linker-plugin 
-fno-fat-lto-objects  (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/convert-dfp.c   -O2 -flto -fuse-linker-plugin 
-fno-fat-lto-objects  (test for excess errors)

New passes:

Regressions on master at commit r15-4387 vs commit r15-4385 on Linux/x86_64

2024-10-16 Thread Haochen Jiang via Gcc-regression 
Regressions on master at commit r15-4387 vs commit r15-4385 on Linux/x86_64
New failures:

New passes:
FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/convert-dfp.c   -O2 -flto -fuse-linker-plugin 
-fno-fat-lto-objects  (test for excess errors)

Regressions on master at commit r15-4385 vs commit r15-4379 on Linux/x86_64

2024-10-16 Thread Haochen Jiang via Gcc-regression 
Regressions on master at commit r15-4385 vs commit r15-4379 on Linux/x86_64
New failures:

New passes:
FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/convert-dfp-2.c   -O2 -flto -fuse-linker-plugin 
-fno-fat-lto-objects  (test for excess errors)

Regressions on native/master at commit r15-4401 vs commit r15-4397 on Linux/x86_64

2024-10-16 Thread Haochen Jiang via Gcc-regression 
Regressions on master at commit r15-4401 vs commit r15-4397 on Linux/x86_64
New failures:

New passes:
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/cond_op_fma_double-1.c scan-assembler-times vfmadd132pd[ 
\\t]+[^{\n]*%ymm[0-9]+{%k[1-7]}(?:\n|[ \\t]+#) 1
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/cond_op_fma_double-1.c scan-assembler-times vfmadd132pd[ 
\\t]+[^{\n]*%ymm[0-9]+{%k[1-7]}(?:\n|[ \\t]+#) 1
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/cond_op_fma_double-1.c scan-assembler-times vfmsub132pd[ 
\\t]+[^{\n]*%ymm[0-9]+{%k[1-7]}(?:\n|[ \\t]+#) 1
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/cond_op_fma_double-1.c scan-assembler-times vfmsub132pd[ 
\\t]+[^{\n]*%ymm[0-9]+{%k[1-7]}(?:\n|[ \\t]+#) 1
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/cond_op_fma_double-1.c scan-assembler-times vfnmadd132pd[ 
\\t]+[^{\n]*%ymm[0-9]+{%k[1-7]}(?:\n|[ \\t]+#) 1
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/cond_op_fma_double-1.c scan-assembler-times vfnmadd132pd[ 
\\t]+[^{\n]*%ymm[0-9]+{%k[1-7]}(?:\n|[ \\t]+#) 1
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/cond_op_fma_double-1.c scan-assembler-times vfnmsub132pd[ 
\\t]+[^{\n]*%ymm[0-9]+{%k[1-7]}(?:\n|[ \\t]+#) 1
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/cond_op_fma_double-1.c scan-assembler-times vfnmsub132pd[ 
\\t]+[^{\n]*%ymm[0-9]+{%k[1-7]}(?:\n|[ \\t]+#) 1
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/cond_op_fma__Float16-1.c scan-assembler-times 
vfmadd132ph[ \\t]+[^{\n]*%ymm[0-9]+{%k[1-7]}(?:\n|[ \\t]+#) 1
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/cond_op_fma__Float16-1.c scan-assembler-times 
vfmadd132ph[ \\t]+[^{\n]*%ymm[0-9]+{%k[1-7]}(?:\n|[ \\t]+#) 1
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/cond_op_fma__Float16-1.c scan-assembler-times 
vfmsub132ph[ \\t]+[^{\n]*%ymm[0-9]+{%k[1-7]}(?:\n|[ \\t]+#) 1
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/cond_op_fma__Float16-1.c scan-assembler-times 
vfmsub132ph[ \\t]+[^{\n]*%ymm[0-9]+{%k[1-7]}(?:\n|[ \\t]+#) 1
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/cond_op_fma__Float16-1.c scan-assembler-times 
vfnmadd132ph[ \\t]+[^{\n]*%ymm[0-9]+{%k[1-7]}(?:\n|[ \\t]+#) 1
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/cond_op_fma__Float16-1.c scan-assembler-times 
vfnmadd132ph[ \\t]+[^{\n]*%ymm[0-9]+{%k[1-7]}(?:\n|[ \\t]+#) 1
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/cond_op_fma__Float16-1.c scan-assembler-times 
vfnmsub132ph[ \\t]+[^{\n]*%ymm[0-9]+{%k[1-7]}(?:\n|[ \\t]+#) 1
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/cond_op_fma__Float16-1.c scan-assembler-times 
vfnmsub132ph[ \\t]+[^{\n]*%ymm[0-9]+{%k[1-7]}(?:\n|[ \\t]+#) 1
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/cond_op_fma_float-1.c scan-assembler-times vfmadd132ps[ 
\\t]+[^{\n]*%ymm[0-9]+{%k[1-7]}(?:\n|[ \\t]+#) 1
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/cond_op_fma_float-1.c scan-assembler-times vfmadd132ps[ 
\\t]+[^{\n]*%ymm[0-9]+{%k[1-7]}(?:\n|[ \\t]+#) 1
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/cond_op_fma_float-1.c scan-assembler-times vfmsub132ps[ 
\\t]+[^{\n]*%ymm[0-9]+{%k[1-7]}(?:\n|[ \\t]+#) 1
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/cond_op_fma_float-1.c scan-assembler-times vfmsub132ps[ 
\\t]+[^{\n]*%ymm[0-9]+{%k[1-7]}(?:\n|[ \\t]+#) 1
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/cond_op_fma_float-1.c scan-assembler-times vfnmadd132ps[ 
\\t]+[^{\n]*%ymm[0-9]+{%k[1-7]}(?:\n|[ \\t]+#) 1
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/cond_op_fma_float-1.c scan-assembler-times vfnmadd132ps[ 
\\t]+[^{\n]*%ymm[0-9]+{%k[1-7]}(?:\n|[ \\t]+#) 1
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/cond_op_fma_float-1.c scan-assembler-times vfnmsub132ps[ 
\\t]+[^{\n]*%ymm[0-9]+{%k[1-7]}(?:\n|[ \\t]+#) 1
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/cond_op_fma_float-1.c scan-assembler-times vfnmsub132ps[ 
\\t]+[^{\n]*%ymm[0-9]+{%k[1-7]}(?:\n|[ \\t]+#) 1

Regressions on master at commit r15-4401 vs commit r15-4397 on Linux/x86_64

2024-10-16 Thread Haochen Jiang via Gcc-regression 
Regressions on master at commit r15-4401 vs commit r15-4397 on Linux/x86_64
New failures:

New passes:
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/cond_op_fma_double-1.c scan-assembler-times vfmadd132pd[ 
\\t]+[^{\n]*%ymm[0-9]+{%k[1-7]}(?:\n|[ \\t]+#) 1
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/cond_op_fma_double-1.c scan-assembler-times vfmadd132pd[ 
\\t]+[^{\n]*%ymm[0-9]+{%k[1-7]}(?:\n|[ \\t]+#) 1
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/cond_op_fma_double-1.c scan-assembler-times vfmsub132pd[ 
\\t]+[^{\n]*%ymm[0-9]+{%k[1-7]}(?:\n|[ \\t]+#) 1
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/cond_op_fma_double-1.c scan-assembler-times vfmsub132pd[ 
\\t]+[^{\n]*%ymm[0-9]+{%k[1-7]}(?:\n|[ \\t]+#) 1
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/cond_op_fma_double-1.c scan-assembler-times vfnmadd132pd[ 
\\t]+[^{\n]*%ymm[0-9]+{%k[1-7]}(?:\n|[ \\t]+#) 1
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/cond_op_fma_double-1.c scan-assembler-times vfnmadd132pd[ 
\\t]+[^{\n]*%ymm[0-9]+{%k[1-7]}(?:\n|[ \\t]+#) 1
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/cond_op_fma_double-1.c scan-assembler-times vfnmsub132pd[ 
\\t]+[^{\n]*%ymm[0-9]+{%k[1-7]}(?:\n|[ \\t]+#) 1
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/cond_op_fma_double-1.c scan-assembler-times vfnmsub132pd[ 
\\t]+[^{\n]*%ymm[0-9]+{%k[1-7]}(?:\n|[ \\t]+#) 1
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/cond_op_fma__Float16-1.c scan-assembler-times 
vfmadd132ph[ \\t]+[^{\n]*%ymm[0-9]+{%k[1-7]}(?:\n|[ \\t]+#) 1
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/cond_op_fma__Float16-1.c scan-assembler-times 
vfmadd132ph[ \\t]+[^{\n]*%ymm[0-9]+{%k[1-7]}(?:\n|[ \\t]+#) 1
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/cond_op_fma__Float16-1.c scan-assembler-times 
vfmsub132ph[ \\t]+[^{\n]*%ymm[0-9]+{%k[1-7]}(?:\n|[ \\t]+#) 1
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/cond_op_fma__Float16-1.c scan-assembler-times 
vfmsub132ph[ \\t]+[^{\n]*%ymm[0-9]+{%k[1-7]}(?:\n|[ \\t]+#) 1
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/cond_op_fma__Float16-1.c scan-assembler-times 
vfnmadd132ph[ \\t]+[^{\n]*%ymm[0-9]+{%k[1-7]}(?:\n|[ \\t]+#) 1
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/cond_op_fma__Float16-1.c scan-assembler-times 
vfnmadd132ph[ \\t]+[^{\n]*%ymm[0-9]+{%k[1-7]}(?:\n|[ \\t]+#) 1
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/cond_op_fma__Float16-1.c scan-assembler-times 
vfnmsub132ph[ \\t]+[^{\n]*%ymm[0-9]+{%k[1-7]}(?:\n|[ \\t]+#) 1
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/cond_op_fma__Float16-1.c scan-assembler-times 
vfnmsub132ph[ \\t]+[^{\n]*%ymm[0-9]+{%k[1-7]}(?:\n|[ \\t]+#) 1
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/cond_op_fma_float-1.c scan-assembler-times vfmadd132ps[ 
\\t]+[^{\n]*%ymm[0-9]+{%k[1-7]}(?:\n|[ \\t]+#) 1
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/cond_op_fma_float-1.c scan-assembler-times vfmadd132ps[ 
\\t]+[^{\n]*%ymm[0-9]+{%k[1-7]}(?:\n|[ \\t]+#) 1
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/cond_op_fma_float-1.c scan-assembler-times vfmsub132ps[ 
\\t]+[^{\n]*%ymm[0-9]+{%k[1-7]}(?:\n|[ \\t]+#) 1
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/cond_op_fma_float-1.c scan-assembler-times vfmsub132ps[ 
\\t]+[^{\n]*%ymm[0-9]+{%k[1-7]}(?:\n|[ \\t]+#) 1
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/cond_op_fma_float-1.c scan-assembler-times vfnmadd132ps[ 
\\t]+[^{\n]*%ymm[0-9]+{%k[1-7]}(?:\n|[ \\t]+#) 1
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/cond_op_fma_float-1.c scan-assembler-times vfnmadd132ps[ 
\\t]+[^{\n]*%ymm[0-9]+{%k[1-7]}(?:\n|[ \\t]+#) 1
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/cond_op_fma_float-1.c scan-assembler-times vfnmsub132ps[ 
\\t]+[^{\n]*%ymm[0-9]+{%k[1-7]}(?:\n|[ \\t]+#) 1
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/cond_op_fma_float-1.c scan-assembler-times vfnmsub132ps[ 
\\t]+[^{\n]*%ymm[0-9]+{%k[1-7]}(?:\n|[ \\t]+#) 1

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-15-4377-gf9bac2388401: Failure on aarch64

2024-10-16 Thread Sam James via Gcc-regression 
This is https://gcc.gnu.org/PR117177 which has a patch posted by Jakub
already at https://inbox.sourceware.org/gcc-patches/ZxArjATvc%2FnI6YiO@tucnak/.

Regressions on master at commit r15-4401 vs commit r15-4397 on Linux/i686

2024-10-16 Thread Haochen Jiang via Gcc-regression 
Regressions on master at commit r15-4401 vs commit r15-4397 on Linux/i686
New failures:

New passes:
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/cond_op_fma_double-1.c scan-assembler-times vfmadd132pd[ 
\\t]+[^{\n]*%ymm[0-9]+{%k[1-7]}(?:\n|[ \\t]+#) 1
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/cond_op_fma_double-1.c scan-assembler-times vfmsub132pd[ 
\\t]+[^{\n]*%ymm[0-9]+{%k[1-7]}(?:\n|[ \\t]+#) 1
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/cond_op_fma_double-1.c scan-assembler-times vfnmadd132pd[ 
\\t]+[^{\n]*%ymm[0-9]+{%k[1-7]}(?:\n|[ \\t]+#) 1
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/cond_op_fma_double-1.c scan-assembler-times vfnmsub132pd[ 
\\t]+[^{\n]*%ymm[0-9]+{%k[1-7]}(?:\n|[ \\t]+#) 1
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/cond_op_fma__Float16-1.c scan-assembler-times 
vfmadd132ph[ \\t]+[^{\n]*%ymm[0-9]+{%k[1-7]}(?:\n|[ \\t]+#) 1
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/cond_op_fma__Float16-1.c scan-assembler-times 
vfmsub132ph[ \\t]+[^{\n]*%ymm[0-9]+{%k[1-7]}(?:\n|[ \\t]+#) 1
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/cond_op_fma__Float16-1.c scan-assembler-times 
vfnmadd132ph[ \\t]+[^{\n]*%ymm[0-9]+{%k[1-7]}(?:\n|[ \\t]+#) 1
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/cond_op_fma__Float16-1.c scan-assembler-times 
vfnmsub132ph[ \\t]+[^{\n]*%ymm[0-9]+{%k[1-7]}(?:\n|[ \\t]+#) 1
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/cond_op_fma_float-1.c scan-assembler-times vfmadd132ps[ 
\\t]+[^{\n]*%ymm[0-9]+{%k[1-7]}(?:\n|[ \\t]+#) 1
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/cond_op_fma_float-1.c scan-assembler-times vfmsub132ps[ 
\\t]+[^{\n]*%ymm[0-9]+{%k[1-7]}(?:\n|[ \\t]+#) 1
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/cond_op_fma_float-1.c scan-assembler-times vfnmadd132ps[ 
\\t]+[^{\n]*%ymm[0-9]+{%k[1-7]}(?:\n|[ \\t]+#) 1
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/cond_op_fma_float-1.c scan-assembler-times vfnmsub132ps[ 
\\t]+[^{\n]*%ymm[0-9]+{%k[1-7]}(?:\n|[ \\t]+#) 1

Regressions on native/master at commit r15-4396 vs commit r15-4393 on Linux/x86_64

2024-10-16 Thread Haochen Jiang via Gcc-regression 
Regressions on master at commit r15-4396 vs commit r15-4393 on Linux/x86_64
New failures:

New passes:
FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/builtin-fp-int-inexact-c23.c   -O2  execution test

Regressions on native/releases/gcc-13 at commit r13-9119 vs commit r13-9118 on Linux/x86_64

2024-10-16 Thread Haochen Jiang via Gcc-regression 
Regressions on releases/gcc-13 at commit r13-9119 vs commit r13-9118 on 
Linux/x86_64
New failures:
FAIL: libgomp.c++/../libgomp.c-c++-common/for-11.c execution test
FAIL: libgomp.c++/../libgomp.c-c++-common/for-12.c execution test
FAIL: libgomp.c++/../libgomp.c-c++-common/for-14.c execution test
FAIL: libgomp.c++/../libgomp.c-c++-common/for-15.c execution test
FAIL: libgomp.c++/../libgomp.c-c++-common/for-3.c execution test
FAIL: libgomp.c++/../libgomp.c-c++-common/for-5.c execution test
FAIL: libgomp.c++/../libgomp.c-c++-common/for-6.c execution test

New passes:

Regressions on native/master at commit r15-4393 vs commit r15-4388 on Linux/x86_64

2024-10-16 Thread Haochen Jiang via Gcc-regression 
Regressions on master at commit r15-4393 vs commit r15-4388 on Linux/x86_64
New failures:
FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/builtin-fp-int-inexact-c23.c   -O2  execution test

New passes:

[Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-15-4377-gf9bac2388401: Failure on aarch64

2024-10-16 Thread ci_notify--- via Gcc-regression 
Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your 
patch(es).  Please find some details below.  If you have any questions, please 
follow up on linaro-toolch...@lists.linaro.org mailing list, Libera's 
#linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain developer on the 
usual project channel.

We understand that it might be difficult to find the necessary logs or 
reproduce the issue locally. If you can't get what you need from our CI within 
minutes, let us know and we will be happy to help.

We track this report status in https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1379 , 
please let us know if you are looking at the problem and/or when you have a fix.

In  master-aarch64 after:

  | commit gcc-15-4377-gf9bac2388401
  | Author: Jakub Jelinek 
  | Date:   Wed Oct 16 10:22:44 2024 +0200
  | 
  | c: Speed up compilation of large char array initializers when not using 
#embed
  | 
  | The following patch on attempts to speed up compilation of large char 
array
  | initializers when one doesn't use #embed in the source.
  | 
  | ... 47 lines of the commit log omitted.

The configuration of this build is:
CI config tcwg_gnu_cross_build master-aarch64
configure and test flags: --target aarch64-linux-gnu
Results changed to
# reset_artifacts:
-10
# true:
0
# build_abe binutils:
1
# build_abe stage1 --:
2
# build_abe linux:
3
# build_abe glibc:
# FAILED
# build_abe stage2 --:
# build_abe gdb:
# build_abe qemu:
# First few build errors in logs:
# 00:02:39 cp1258.c:551:13: error: size of array ‘verify2’ is negative
# 00:02:39 cp1255.c:376:13: error: size of array ‘verify2’ is negative
# 00:02:39 make[2]: *** [../o-iterator.mk:9: 
/home/tcwg-buildslave/workspace/tcwg_gnu_0/abe/builds/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/aarch64-linux-gnu/glibc-glibc.git~master/iconvdata/cp1258.os]
 Error 1
# 00:02:39 make[2]: *** [../o-iterator.mk:9: 
/home/tcwg-buildslave/workspace/tcwg_gnu_0/abe/builds/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/aarch64-linux-gnu/glibc-glibc.git~master/iconvdata/cp1255.os]
 Error 1
# 00:02:45 make[1]: *** [Makefile:484: iconvdata/others] Error 2
# 00:02:45 make: *** [Makefile:9: all] Error 2

From
# reset_artifacts:
-10
# true:
0
# build_abe binutils:
1
# build_abe stage1 --:
2
# build_abe linux:
3
# build_abe glibc:
4
# build_abe stage2 --:
5
# build_abe gdb:
6
# build_abe qemu:
# FAILED

-8<--8<--8<--
The information below can be used to reproduce a debug environment:

Current build   : 
https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_cross_build--master-aarch64-build/863/artifact/artifacts
Reference build : 
https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_cross_build--master-aarch64-build/862/artifact/artifacts

Instruction to reproduce the build : 
https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/gcc/sha1/f9bac238840155e1539aa68daf1507ea63c9ed80/tcwg_gnu_cross_build/master-aarch64/reproduction_instructions.txt

Full commit : 
https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/commit/f9bac238840155e1539aa68daf1507ea63c9ed80