Regressions on master at commit r15-3898 vs commit r15-3895 on Linux/i686
Regressions on master at commit r15-3898 vs commit r15-3895 on Linux/i686 New failures: FAIL: 30_threads/future/members/poll.cc -std=gnu++17 execution test New passes:
[r15-3890 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/initialization_25.f90 -O (test for errors, line 11) on Linux/x86_64
On Linux/x86_64,
34bf6aa41ba5390ce26eb40208f10186d0ab17c4 is the first bad commit
commit 34bf6aa41ba5390ce26eb40208f10186d0ab17c4
Author: Sam James
Date: Fri Aug 2 06:38:34 2024 +0100
testsuite: fix hyphen typos
caused
FAIL: gfortran.dg/initialization_25.f90 -O (test for errors, line 11)
with GCC configured with
../../gcc/configure
--prefix=/export/users/haochenj/src/gcc-bisect/master/master/r15-3890/usr
--enable-clocale=gnu --with-system-zlib --with-demangler-in-ld
--with-fpmath=sse --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran --enable-cet --without-isl
--enable-libmpx x86_64-linux --disable-bootstrap
To reproduce:
$ cd {build_dir}/gcc && make check
RUNTESTFLAGS="dg.exp=gfortran.dg/initialization_25.f90
--target_board='unix{-m32}'"
$ cd {build_dir}/gcc && make check
RUNTESTFLAGS="dg.exp=gfortran.dg/initialization_25.f90
--target_board='unix{-m32\ -march=cascadelake}'"
$ cd {build_dir}/gcc && make check
RUNTESTFLAGS="dg.exp=gfortran.dg/initialization_25.f90
--target_board='unix{-m64}'"
$ cd {build_dir}/gcc && make check
RUNTESTFLAGS="dg.exp=gfortran.dg/initialization_25.f90
--target_board='unix{-m64\ -march=cascadelake}'"
(Please do not reply to this email, for question about this report, contact me
at haochen dot jiang at intel.com.)
(If you met problems with cascadelake related, disabling AVX512F in command
line might save that.)
(However, please make sure that there is no potential problems with AVX512.)
Regressions on master at commit r15-3891 vs commit r15-3887 on Linux/i686
Regressions on master at commit r15-3891 vs commit r15-3887 on Linux/i686 New failures: FAIL: gfortran.dg/initialization_25.f90 -O (test for errors, line 11) New passes:
Regressions on master at commit r15-3891 vs commit r15-3887 on Linux/x86_64
Regressions on master at commit r15-3891 vs commit r15-3887 on Linux/x86_64 New failures: FAIL: gfortran.dg/initialization_25.f90 -O (test for errors, line 11) FAIL: gfortran.dg/initialization_25.f90 -O (test for errors, line 11) New passes:
Regressions on native/master at commit r15-3891 vs commit r15-3887 on Linux/x86_64
Regressions on master at commit r15-3891 vs commit r15-3887 on Linux/x86_64 New failures: FAIL: gfortran.dg/initialization_25.f90 -O (test for errors, line 11) FAIL: gfortran.dg/initialization_25.f90 -O (test for errors, line 11) New passes:
[Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-15-3890-g34bf6aa41ba: FAIL: 1 regressions on aarch64
Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. If you have any questions, please follow up on linaro-toolch...@lists.linaro.org mailing list, Libera's #linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain developer on the usual project channel. We understand that it might be difficult to find the necessary logs or reproduce the issue locally. If you can't get what you need from our CI within minutes, let us know and we will be happy to help. We track this report status in https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1354 , please let us know if you are looking at the problem and/or when you have a fix. In gcc_check master-aarch64 after: | commit gcc-15-3890-g34bf6aa41ba | Author: Sam James | Date: Fri Aug 2 06:38:34 2024 +0100 | | testsuite: fix hyphen typos | | gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: | | * g++.dg/modules/reparent-1_c.C: Fix whitespace around '-' in dg directive. | ... 1 lines of the commit log omitted. FAIL: 1 regressions regressions.sum: | === gfortran tests === | | Running gfortran:gfortran.dg/dg.exp ... | FAIL: gfortran.dg/initialization_25.f90 -O (test for errors, line 11) | | # "FAIL" means : the execution of the compiled binary failed / output of the binary differs from the expected one You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-aarch64-build/2664/artifact/artifacts/00-sumfiles/ The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-aarch64-build/2664/artifact/artifacts/notify/ The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-aarch64-build/2664/artifact/artifacts/sumfiles/xfails.xfail The configuration of this build is: CI config tcwg_gcc_check master-aarch64 -8<--8<--8<-- The information below can be used to reproduce a debug environment: Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-aarch64-build/2664/artifact/artifacts Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-aarch64-build/2663/artifact/artifacts Instruction to reproduce the build : https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/gcc/sha1/34bf6aa41ba5390ce26eb40208f10186d0ab17c4/tcwg_gcc_check/master-aarch64/reproduction_instructions.txt Full commit : https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/commit/34bf6aa41ba5390ce26eb40208f10186d0ab17c4
[Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-15-3899-g819098dc71f2: FAIL: 1 regressions: 1 improvements on aarch64
Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. If you have any questions, please follow up on linaro-toolch...@lists.linaro.org mailing list, Libera's #linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain developer on the usual project channel. We understand that it might be difficult to find the necessary logs or reproduce the issue locally. If you can't get what you need from our CI within minutes, let us know and we will be happy to help. We track this report status in https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1356 , please let us know if you are looking at the problem and/or when you have a fix. In gcc_check master-aarch64 after: | commit gcc-15-3899-g819098dc71f2 | Author: Sam James | Date: Thu Sep 26 15:43:33 2024 +0100 | | testsuite: XFAIL gfortran.dg/initialization_25.f90 properly | | The test was disabled/XFAIL'd informally in r0-100012-gcdc6637d7c78ec, | but r15-3890-g34bf6aa41ba539 didn't realize this, causing a FAIL. | | ... 7 lines of the commit log omitted. FAIL: 1 regressions: 1 improvements regressions.sum: | === gfortran tests === | | Running gfortran:gfortran.dg/dg.exp ... | FAIL: gfortran.dg/initialization_25.f90 -O xfail *-*-* (test for errors, line 11) | | # "FAIL" means : the execution of the compiled binary failed / output of the binary differs from the expected one improvements.sum: | === gfortran tests === | | Running gfortran:gfortran.dg/dg.exp ... | FAIL: gfortran.dg/initialization_25.f90 -O (test for errors, line 11) | | # "FAIL" means : the execution of the compiled binary failed / output of the binary differs from the expected one You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-aarch64-build/2668/artifact/artifacts/00-sumfiles/ The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-aarch64-build/2668/artifact/artifacts/notify/ The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-aarch64-build/2668/artifact/artifacts/sumfiles/xfails.xfail The configuration of this build is: CI config tcwg_gcc_check master-aarch64 -8<--8<--8<-- The information below can be used to reproduce a debug environment: Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-aarch64-build/2668/artifact/artifacts Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-aarch64-build/2667/artifact/artifacts Instruction to reproduce the build : https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/gcc/sha1/819098dc71f2079aedc15a904ab5f17f0788d991/tcwg_gcc_check/master-aarch64/reproduction_instructions.txt Full commit : https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/commit/819098dc71f2079aedc15a904ab5f17f0788d991
[Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-15-3887-g454371d8507: FAIL: 2 regressions on arm
Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. If you have any questions, please follow up on linaro-toolch...@lists.linaro.org mailing list, Libera's #linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain developer on the usual project channel. We understand that it might be difficult to find the necessary logs or reproduce the issue locally. If you can't get what you need from our CI within minutes, let us know and we will be happy to help. We track this report status in https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1355 , please let us know if you are looking at the problem and/or when you have a fix. In gcc_check master-arm after: | commit gcc-15-3887-g454371d8507 | Author: Kugan Vivekanandarajah | Date: Thu Sep 26 15:56:06 2024 +1000 | | [match.pd] Handle abs pattern with convert | | gcc/ChangeLog: | | * match.pd: Extend A CMP 0 ? A : -A into (type)A CMP 0 ? A : -A. | ... 8 lines of the commit log omitted. FAIL: 2 regressions regressions.sum: | === gcc tests === | | Running gcc:gcc.dg/tree-ssa/tree-ssa.exp ... | FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/absfloat16.c (test for excess errors) | UNRESOLVED: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/absfloat16.c scan-tree-dump-times optimized " = ABS_EXPR ;" 1 | | # "FAIL" means : the execution of the compiled binary failed / output of the binary differs from the expected one You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/2764/artifact/artifacts/00-sumfiles/ The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/2764/artifact/artifacts/notify/ The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/2764/artifact/artifacts/sumfiles/xfails.xfail The configuration of this build is: CI config tcwg_gcc_check master-arm -8<--8<--8<-- The information below can be used to reproduce a debug environment: Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/2764/artifact/artifacts Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/2763/artifact/artifacts Instruction to reproduce the build : https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/gcc/sha1/454371d850797600872e20da9464504cb80b0788/tcwg_gcc_check/master-arm/reproduction_instructions.txt Full commit : https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/commit/454371d850797600872e20da9464504cb80b0788
Regressions on native/master at commit r15-3903 vs commit r15-3897 on Linux/x86_64
Regressions on master at commit r15-3903 vs commit r15-3897 on Linux/x86_64 New failures: FAIL: gfortran.dg/initialization_25.f90 -O xfail *-*-* (test for errors, line 11) FAIL: gfortran.dg/initialization_25.f90 -O xfail *-*-* (test for errors, line 11) New passes: FAIL: gfortran.dg/initialization_25.f90 -O (test for errors, line 11) FAIL: gfortran.dg/initialization_25.f90 -O (test for errors, line 11)
[r15-3899 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/initialization_25.f90 -O xfail *-*-* (test for errors, line 11) on Linux/x86_64
On Linux/x86_64,
819098dc71f2079aedc15a904ab5f17f0788d991 is the first bad commit
commit 819098dc71f2079aedc15a904ab5f17f0788d991
Author: Sam James
Date: Thu Sep 26 15:43:33 2024 +0100
testsuite: XFAIL gfortran.dg/initialization_25.f90 properly
caused
FAIL: gfortran.dg/initialization_25.f90 -O xfail *-*-* (test for errors,
line 11)
with GCC configured with
../../gcc/configure
--prefix=/export/users/haochenj/src/gcc-bisect/master/master/r15-3899/usr
--enable-clocale=gnu --with-system-zlib --with-demangler-in-ld
--with-fpmath=sse --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran --enable-cet --without-isl
--enable-libmpx x86_64-linux --disable-bootstrap
To reproduce:
$ cd {build_dir}/gcc && make check
RUNTESTFLAGS="dg.exp=gfortran.dg/initialization_25.f90
--target_board='unix{-m32}'"
$ cd {build_dir}/gcc && make check
RUNTESTFLAGS="dg.exp=gfortran.dg/initialization_25.f90
--target_board='unix{-m32\ -march=cascadelake}'"
$ cd {build_dir}/gcc && make check
RUNTESTFLAGS="dg.exp=gfortran.dg/initialization_25.f90
--target_board='unix{-m64}'"
$ cd {build_dir}/gcc && make check
RUNTESTFLAGS="dg.exp=gfortran.dg/initialization_25.f90
--target_board='unix{-m64\ -march=cascadelake}'"
(Please do not reply to this email, for question about this report, contact me
at haochen dot jiang at intel.com.)
(If you met problems with cascadelake related, disabling AVX512F in command
line might save that.)
(However, please make sure that there is no potential problems with AVX512.)
Regressions on master at commit r15-3903 vs commit r15-3898 on Linux/i686
Regressions on master at commit r15-3903 vs commit r15-3898 on Linux/i686 New failures: FAIL: gfortran.dg/initialization_25.f90 -O xfail *-*-* (test for errors, line 11) New passes: FAIL: 30_threads/future/members/poll.cc -std=gnu++17 execution test FAIL: gfortran.dg/initialization_25.f90 -O (test for errors, line 11)
Regressions on master at commit r15-3905 vs commit r15-3903 on Linux/x86_64
Regressions on master at commit r15-3905 vs commit r15-3903 on Linux/x86_64 New failures: New passes: FAIL: 30_threads/async/async.cc -std=gnu++17 execution test
Regressions on master at commit r15-3903 vs commit r15-3898 on Linux/x86_64
Regressions on master at commit r15-3903 vs commit r15-3898 on Linux/x86_64 New failures: FAIL: 30_threads/async/async.cc -std=gnu++17 execution test FAIL: gfortran.dg/initialization_25.f90 -O xfail *-*-* (test for errors, line 11) FAIL: gfortran.dg/initialization_25.f90 -O xfail *-*-* (test for errors, line 11) New passes: FAIL: gfortran.dg/initialization_25.f90 -O (test for errors, line 11) FAIL: gfortran.dg/initialization_25.f90 -O (test for errors, line 11)
