[Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-15-3362-g464067a24215: FAIL: 4 regressions on aarch64
Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. If you have any questions, please follow up on linaro-toolch...@lists.linaro.org mailing list, Libera's #linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain developer on the usual project channel. We understand that it might be difficult to find the necessary logs or reproduce the issue locally. If you can't get what you need from our CI within minutes, let us know and we will be happy to help. We track this report status in https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1335 , please let us know if you are looking at the problem and/or when you have a fix. In master-aarch64 after: | commit gcc-15-3362-g464067a24215 | Author: Richard Biener | Date: Mon May 13 14:57:01 2024 +0200 | | lower SLP load permutation to interleaving | | The following emulates classical interleaving for SLP load permutes | that we are unlikely handling natively. This is to handle cases | where interleaving (or load/store-lanes) is the optimal choice for | vectorizing even when we are doing that within SLP. An example | would be | ... 82 lines of the commit log omitted. FAIL: 4 regressions regressions.sum: === gcc tests === Running gcc:gcc.dg/vect/vect.exp ... FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/slp-51.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects scan-tree-dump vect "vectorizing stmts using SLP" FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/slp-51.c scan-tree-dump vect "vectorizing stmts using SLP" FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/slp-52.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects scan-tree-dump vect "vectorizing stmts using SLP" FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/slp-52.c scan-tree-dump vect "vectorizing stmts using SLP" You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in - https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_native_check_gcc--master-aarch64-build/1346/artifact/artifacts/00-sumfiles/ The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in - https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_native_check_gcc--master-aarch64-build/1346/artifact/artifacts/notify/ The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in - https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_native_check_gcc--master-aarch64-build/1346/artifact/artifacts/sumfiles/xfails.xfail The configuration of this build is: CI config tcwg_gnu_native_check_gcc master-aarch64 -8<--8<--8<-- The information below can be used to reproduce a debug environment: Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_native_check_gcc--master-aarch64-build/1346/artifact/artifacts Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_native_check_gcc--master-aarch64-build/1345/artifact/artifacts Reproduce last good and first bad builds: https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/gcc/sha1/464067a242150628ceb0d47daf2297f29a31743c/tcwg_gnu_native_check_gcc/master-aarch64/reproduction_instructions.txt Full commit : https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/commit/464067a242150628ceb0d47daf2297f29a31743c List of configurations that regressed due to this commit : * tcwg_gnu_native_check_gcc ** master-aarch64 *** FAIL: 4 regressions *** https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/gcc/sha1/464067a242150628ceb0d47daf2297f29a31743c/tcwg_gnu_native_check_gcc/master-aarch64/details.txt *** https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_native_check_gcc--master-aarch64-build/1346/artifact/artifacts
Regressions on master at commit r15-3530 vs commit r15-3526 on Linux/x86_64
Regressions on master at commit r15-3530 vs commit r15-3526 on Linux/x86_64 New failures: FAIL: gcc.dg/pr116588.c (test for excess errors) New passes:
Regressions on master at commit r15-3530 vs commit r15-3526 on Linux/i686
Regressions on master at commit r15-3530 vs commit r15-3526 on Linux/i686 New failures: FAIL: gcc.dg/pr116588.c (test for excess errors) New passes:
Regressions on native/master at commit r15-3530 vs commit r15-3526 on Linux/x86_64
Regressions on master at commit r15-3530 vs commit r15-3526 on Linux/x86_64 New failures: FAIL: gcc.dg/pr116588.c (test for excess errors) New passes:
Regressions on native/releases/gcc-14 at commit r14-10652 vs commit r14-10648 on Linux/x86_64
Regressions on releases/gcc-14 at commit r14-10652 vs commit r14-10648 on Linux/x86_64 New failures: FAIL: libgomp.c++/../libgomp.c-c++-common/for-11.c execution test FAIL: libgomp.c/../libgomp.c-c++-common/for-11.c execution test FAIL: libgomp.c++/../libgomp.c-c++-common/for-12.c execution test FAIL: libgomp.c++/../libgomp.c-c++-common/for-14.c execution test FAIL: libgomp.c/../libgomp.c-c++-common/for-14.c execution test FAIL: libgomp.c/../libgomp.c-c++-common/for-15.c execution test FAIL: libgomp.c++/../libgomp.c-c++-common/for-3.c execution test FAIL: libgomp.c++/../libgomp.c-c++-common/for-5.c execution test FAIL: libgomp.c/../libgomp.c-c++-common/for-5.c execution test FAIL: libgomp.c++/../libgomp.c-c++-common/for-9.c execution test FAIL: libgomp.c/../libgomp.c-c++-common/for-9.c execution test New passes:
[r15-3529 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/pr116588.c (test for excess errors) on Linux/x86_64
On Linux/x86_64,
506417dbc8b1cbc1133a5322572cf94b671aadf6 is the first bad commit
commit 506417dbc8b1cbc1133a5322572cf94b671aadf6
Author: Andrew MacLeod
Date: Fri Sep 6 11:42:14 2024 -0400
Before running fast VRP, make sure all edges have EXECUTABLE set.
caused
FAIL: gcc.dg/pr116588.c (test for excess errors)
with GCC configured with
../../gcc/configure
--prefix=/export/users/haochenj/src/gcc-bisect/master/master/r15-3529/usr
--enable-clocale=gnu --with-system-zlib --with-demangler-in-ld
--with-fpmath=sse --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran --enable-cet --without-isl
--enable-libmpx x86_64-linux --disable-bootstrap
To reproduce:
$ cd {build_dir}/gcc && make check RUNTESTFLAGS="dg.exp=gcc.dg/pr116588.c
--target_board='unix{-m32}'"
$ cd {build_dir}/gcc && make check RUNTESTFLAGS="dg.exp=gcc.dg/pr116588.c
--target_board='unix{-m32\ -march=cascadelake}'"
(Please do not reply to this email, for question about this report, contact me
at haochen dot jiang at intel.com.)
(If you met problems with cascadelake related, disabling AVX512F in command
line might save that.)
(However, please make sure that there is no potential problems with AVX512.)
Re: [r15-3529 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/pr116588.c (test for excess errors) on Linux/x86_64
On Sat, Sep 7, 2024 at 4:11 PM haochen.jiang wrote:
>
> On Linux/x86_64,
>
> 506417dbc8b1cbc1133a5322572cf94b671aadf6 is the first bad commit
> commit 506417dbc8b1cbc1133a5322572cf94b671aadf6
> Author: Andrew MacLeod
> Date: Fri Sep 6 11:42:14 2024 -0400
>
> Before running fast VRP, make sure all edges have EXECUTABLE set.
>
> caused
>
> FAIL: gcc.dg/pr116588.c (test for excess errors)
Fixed with r15-3533-g35c2bcb2389d34 .
Thanks,
Andrew Pinski
>
> with GCC configured with
>
> ../../gcc/configure
> --prefix=/export/users/haochenj/src/gcc-bisect/master/master/r15-3529/usr
> --enable-clocale=gnu --with-system-zlib --with-demangler-in-ld
> --with-fpmath=sse --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran --enable-cet --without-isl
> --enable-libmpx x86_64-linux --disable-bootstrap
>
> To reproduce:
>
> $ cd {build_dir}/gcc && make check RUNTESTFLAGS="dg.exp=gcc.dg/pr116588.c
> --target_board='unix{-m32}'"
> $ cd {build_dir}/gcc && make check RUNTESTFLAGS="dg.exp=gcc.dg/pr116588.c
> --target_board='unix{-m32\ -march=cascadelake}'"
>
> (Please do not reply to this email, for question about this report, contact
> me at haochen dot jiang at intel.com.)
> (If you met problems with cascadelake related, disabling AVX512F in command
> line might save that.)
> (However, please make sure that there is no potential problems with AVX512.)
[Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-15-3526-g113a6da9bf91: FAIL: 1 regressions on arm
Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. If you have any questions, please follow up on linaro-toolch...@lists.linaro.org mailing list, Libera's #linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain developer on the usual project channel. We understand that it might be difficult to find the necessary logs or reproduce the issue locally. If you can't get what you need from our CI within minutes, let us know and we will be happy to help. We track this report status in https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1336 , please let us know if you are looking at the problem and/or when you have a fix. In gcc_check master-arm after: | commit gcc-15-3526-g113a6da9bf91 | Author: Thomas Koenig | Date: Sat Sep 7 16:59:46 2024 +0200 | | Implement first part of unsigned integers for Fortran. | | gcc/fortran/ChangeLog: | | * arith.cc (gfc_reduce_unsigned): New function. | (gfc_arith_error): Add ARITH_UNSIGNED_TRUNCATED and | ARITH_UNSIGNED_NEGATIVE. | ... 212 lines of the commit log omitted. FAIL: 1 regressions regressions.sum: === gfortran tests === Running gfortran:gfortran.dg/gomp/gomp.exp ... FAIL: gfortran.dg/gomp/interop-1.f90 -O (test for excess errors) You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in - https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/2674/artifact/artifacts/00-sumfiles/ The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in - https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/2674/artifact/artifacts/notify/ The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in - https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/2674/artifact/artifacts/sumfiles/xfails.xfail The configuration of this build is: CI config tcwg_gcc_check master-arm -8<--8<--8<-- The information below can be used to reproduce a debug environment: Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/2674/artifact/artifacts Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/2672/artifact/artifacts Reproduce last good and first bad builds: https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/gcc/sha1/113a6da9bf91c52b026dddfc51144f9124fd803b/tcwg_gcc_check/master-arm/reproduction_instructions.txt Full commit : https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/commit/113a6da9bf91c52b026dddfc51144f9124fd803b List of configurations that regressed due to this commit : * tcwg_gcc_check ** master-arm *** FAIL: 1 regressions *** https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/gcc/sha1/113a6da9bf91c52b026dddfc51144f9124fd803b/tcwg_gcc_check/master-arm/details.txt *** https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/2674/artifact/artifacts
Regressions on native/master at commit r15-3533 vs commit r15-3531 on Linux/x86_64
Regressions on master at commit r15-3533 vs commit r15-3531 on Linux/x86_64 New failures: New passes: FAIL: gcc.dg/pr116588.c (test for excess errors)
