Regressions on master at commit r15-2362 vs commit r15-2359 on Linux/x86_64
Regressions on master at commit r15-2362 vs commit r15-2359 on Linux/x86_64 New failures: FAIL: g++.dg/cpp2a/consteval-prop21.C -std=c++20 (test for excess errors) FAIL: g++.dg/cpp2a/consteval-prop21.C -std=c++23 (test for excess errors) FAIL: g++.dg/cpp2a/consteval-prop21.C -std=c++26 (test for excess errors) New passes:
Regressions on master at commit r15-2362 vs commit r15-2359 on Linux/i686
Regressions on master at commit r15-2362 vs commit r15-2359 on Linux/i686 New failures: FAIL: g++.dg/cpp2a/consteval-prop21.C -std=c++20 (test for excess errors) FAIL: g++.dg/cpp2a/consteval-prop21.C -std=c++23 (test for excess errors) FAIL: g++.dg/cpp2a/consteval-prop21.C -std=c++26 (test for excess errors) FAIL: g++.dg/ext/visibility/fvisibility-inlines-hidden-2.C -std=gnu++26 scan-not-hidden FAIL: g++.dg/ext/visibility/fvisibility-inlines-hidden-3.C -std=gnu++26 scan-not-hidden FAIL: g++.dg/ext/visibility/fvisibility-inlines-hidden-3.C -std=gnu++26 scan-not-hidden FAIL: g++.dg/ext/visibility/fvisibility-inlines-hidden-4.C -std=gnu++26 scan-not-hidden FAIL: g++.dg/ext/visibility/fvisibility-inlines-hidden-4.C -std=gnu++26 scan-not-hidden FAIL: g++.dg/ext/visibility/fvisibility-override1.C -std=gnu++26 scan-not-hidden FAIL: g++.dg/ext/visibility/fvisibility-override2.C -std=gnu++26 scan-not-hidden FAIL: g++.dg/ext/visibility/guard1.C -std=gnu++26 scan-not-hidden FAIL: g++.dg/ext/visibility/ms-compat-1.C -std=gnu++26 scan-not-hidden FAIL: g++.dg/ext/visibility/ms-compat-1.C -std=gnu++26 scan-not-hidden FAIL: g++.dg/ext/visibility/ms-compat-1.C -std=gnu++26 scan-not-hidden FAIL: g++.dg/ext/visibility/namespace1.C -std=c++26 scan-not-hidden FAIL: g++.dg/ext/visibility/new1.C -std=gnu++26 scan-not-hidden FAIL: g++.dg/ext/visibility/template10.C -std=gnu++26 scan-not-hidden FAIL: g++.dg/ext/visibility/template11.C -std=gnu++26 scan-not-hidden FAIL: g++.dg/ext/visibility/template12.C -std=gnu++26 scan-not-hidden FAIL: g++.dg/ext/visibility/template1.C -std=gnu++26 scan-not-hidden FAIL: g++.dg/ext/visibility/template1.C -std=gnu++26 scan-not-hidden FAIL: g++.dg/ext/visibility/template2.C -std=c++26 scan-not-hidden FAIL: g++.dg/ext/visibility/template2.C -std=c++26 scan-not-hidden FAIL: g++.dg/ext/visibility/template3.C -std=c++26 scan-not-hidden FAIL: g++.dg/ext/visibility/template3.C -std=c++26 scan-not-hidden FAIL: g++.dg/ext/visibility/template4.C -std=c++26 scan-not-hidden FAIL: g++.dg/ext/visibility/template4.C -std=c++26 scan-not-hidden FAIL: g++.dg/ext/visibility/template4.C -std=c++26 scan-not-hidden FAIL: g++.dg/ext/visibility/template4.C -std=c++26 scan-not-hidden FAIL: g++.dg/ext/visibility/template6.C -std=c++26 scan-not-hidden FAIL: g++.dg/ext/visibility/template9.C -std=gnu++26 scan-not-hidden FAIL: g++.dg/ext/visibility/typeinfo1.C -std=gnu++26 scan-not-hidden FAIL: g++.dg/ext/visibility/typeinfo1.C -std=gnu++26 scan-not-hidden FAIL: g++.dg/ext/visibility/typeinfo2.C -std=c++26 scan-not-hidden FAIL: g++.dg/ext/visibility/typeinfo3.C -std=c++26 scan-not-hidden FAIL: g++.dg/ext/visibility/typeinfo3.C -std=c++26 scan-not-hidden FAIL: g++.dg/ext/visibility/warn3.C -std=c++26 scan-not-hidden FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.mike/visibility-1.C -std=gnu++26 scan-not-hidden New passes: FAIL: g++.dg/ext/visibility/fvisibility-inlines-hidden-2.C -std=gnu++14 scan-not-hidden FAIL: g++.dg/ext/visibility/fvisibility-inlines-hidden-2.C -std=gnu++20 scan-not-hidden FAIL: g++.dg/ext/visibility/fvisibility-inlines-hidden-3.C -std=gnu++14 scan-not-hidden FAIL: g++.dg/ext/visibility/fvisibility-inlines-hidden-3.C -std=gnu++14 scan-not-hidden FAIL: g++.dg/ext/visibility/fvisibility-inlines-hidden-3.C -std=gnu++20 scan-not-hidden FAIL: g++.dg/ext/visibility/fvisibility-inlines-hidden-3.C -std=gnu++20 scan-not-hidden FAIL: g++.dg/ext/visibility/fvisibility-inlines-hidden-4.C -std=gnu++14 scan-not-hidden FAIL: g++.dg/ext/visibility/fvisibility-inlines-hidden-4.C -std=gnu++14 scan-not-hidden FAIL: g++.dg/ext/visibility/fvisibility-inlines-hidden-4.C -std=gnu++20 scan-not-hidden FAIL: g++.dg/ext/visibility/fvisibility-inlines-hidden-4.C -std=gnu++20 scan-not-hidden FAIL: g++.dg/ext/visibility/fvisibility-override1.C -std=gnu++14 scan-not-hidden FAIL: g++.dg/ext/visibility/fvisibility-override1.C -std=gnu++20 scan-not-hidden FAIL: g++.dg/ext/visibility/fvisibility-override2.C -std=gnu++14 scan-not-hidden FAIL: g++.dg/ext/visibility/fvisibility-override2.C -std=gnu++20 scan-not-hidden FAIL: g++.dg/ext/visibility/guard1.C -std=gnu++14 scan-not-hidden FAIL: g++.dg/ext/visibility/guard1.C -std=gnu++20 scan-not-hidden FAIL: g++.dg/ext/visibility/ms-compat-1.C -std=gnu++14 scan-not-hidden FAIL: g++.dg/ext/visibility/ms-compat-1.C -std=gnu++14 scan-not-hidden FAIL: g++.dg/ext/visibility/ms-compat-1.C -std=gnu++14 scan-not-hidden FAIL: g++.dg/ext/visibility/ms-compat-1.C -std=gnu++20 scan-not-hidden FAIL: g++.dg/ext/visibility/ms-compat-1.C -std=gnu++20 scan-not-hidden FAIL: g++.dg/ext/visibility/ms-compat-1.C -std=gnu++20 scan-not-hidden FAIL: g++.dg/ext/visibility/namespace1.C -std=c++14 scan-not-hidden FAIL: g++.dg/ext/visibility/namespace1.C -std=c++20 scan-not-hidden FAIL: g++.dg/ext/visibility/new1.C -std=gnu++14 scan-not-hidden FAI
Regressions on native/master at commit r15-2362 vs commit r15-2359 on Linux/x86_64
Regressions on master at commit r15-2362 vs commit r15-2359 on Linux/x86_64 New failures: FAIL: g++.dg/cpp2a/consteval-prop21.C -std=c++20 (test for excess errors) FAIL: g++.dg/cpp2a/consteval-prop21.C -std=c++23 (test for excess errors) FAIL: g++.dg/cpp2a/consteval-prop21.C -std=c++26 (test for excess errors) FAIL: g++.dg/vect/simd-bool-comparison-1.cc -std=c++26 scan-tree-dump-times vect "vectorized 1 loops" 1 FAIL: g++.dg/vect/simd-bool-comparison-1.cc -std=c++26 scan-tree-dump-times vect "vectorized 1 loops" 1 FAIL: g++.target/i386/mv28.C -std=c++26 (test for errors, line 10) FAIL: g++.target/i386/mv28.C -std=c++26 (test for errors, line 10) FAIL: g++.target/i386/mv28.C -std=c++26 (test for errors, line 11) FAIL: g++.target/i386/mv28.C -std=c++26 (test for errors, line 11) FAIL: g++.target/i386/mv28.C -std=c++26 (test for errors, line 12) FAIL: g++.target/i386/mv28.C -std=c++26 (test for errors, line 12) FAIL: g++.target/i386/mv28.C -std=c++26 (test for errors, line 13) FAIL: g++.target/i386/mv28.C -std=c++26 (test for errors, line 13) FAIL: g++.target/i386/mv28.C -std=c++26 (test for errors, line 14) FAIL: g++.target/i386/mv28.C -std=c++26 (test for errors, line 14) FAIL: g++.target/i386/mv28.C -std=c++26 (test for errors, line 15) FAIL: g++.target/i386/mv28.C -std=c++26 (test for errors, line 15) FAIL: g++.target/i386/mv28.C -std=c++26 (test for errors, line 4) FAIL: g++.target/i386/mv28.C -std=c++26 (test for errors, line 4) FAIL: g++.target/i386/mv28.C -std=c++26 (test for errors, line 5) FAIL: g++.target/i386/mv28.C -std=c++26 (test for errors, line 5) FAIL: g++.target/i386/mv28.C -std=c++26 (test for errors, line 6) FAIL: g++.target/i386/mv28.C -std=c++26 (test for errors, line 6) FAIL: g++.target/i386/mv28.C -std=c++26 (test for errors, line 7) FAIL: g++.target/i386/mv28.C -std=c++26 (test for errors, line 7) FAIL: g++.target/i386/mv28.C -std=c++26 (test for errors, line 8) FAIL: g++.target/i386/mv28.C -std=c++26 (test for errors, line 8) FAIL: g++.target/i386/mv28.C -std=c++26 (test for errors, line 9) FAIL: g++.target/i386/mv28.C -std=c++26 (test for errors, line 9) FAIL: g++.target/i386/pr82625.C -std=gnu++26 scan-tree-dump-times optimized "return 4096;" 1 FAIL: g++.target/i386/pr82625.C -std=gnu++26 scan-tree-dump-times optimized "return 4096;" 1 FAIL: g++.target/i386/pr82625.C -std=gnu++26 scan-tree-dump-times optimized "return 8192;" 1 FAIL: g++.target/i386/pr82625.C -std=gnu++26 scan-tree-dump-times optimized "return 8192;" 1 New passes: FAIL: g++.dg/vect/simd-bool-comparison-1.cc -std=c++14 scan-tree-dump-times vect "vectorized 1 loops" 1 FAIL: g++.dg/vect/simd-bool-comparison-1.cc -std=c++14 scan-tree-dump-times vect "vectorized 1 loops" 1 FAIL: g++.dg/vect/simd-bool-comparison-1.cc -std=c++20 scan-tree-dump-times vect "vectorized 1 loops" 1 FAIL: g++.dg/vect/simd-bool-comparison-1.cc -std=c++20 scan-tree-dump-times vect "vectorized 1 loops" 1 FAIL: g++.target/i386/mv28.C -std=c++14 (test for errors, line 10) FAIL: g++.target/i386/mv28.C -std=c++14 (test for errors, line 10) FAIL: g++.target/i386/mv28.C -std=c++14 (test for errors, line 11) FAIL: g++.target/i386/mv28.C -std=c++14 (test for errors, line 11) FAIL: g++.target/i386/mv28.C -std=c++14 (test for errors, line 12) FAIL: g++.target/i386/mv28.C -std=c++14 (test for errors, line 12) FAIL: g++.target/i386/mv28.C -std=c++14 (test for errors, line 13) FAIL: g++.target/i386/mv28.C -std=c++14 (test for errors, line 13) FAIL: g++.target/i386/mv28.C -std=c++14 (test for errors, line 14) FAIL: g++.target/i386/mv28.C -std=c++14 (test for errors, line 14) FAIL: g++.target/i386/mv28.C -std=c++14 (test for errors, line 15) FAIL: g++.target/i386/mv28.C -std=c++14 (test for errors, line 15) FAIL: g++.target/i386/mv28.C -std=c++14 (test for errors, line 4) FAIL: g++.target/i386/mv28.C -std=c++14 (test for errors, line 4) FAIL: g++.target/i386/mv28.C -std=c++14 (test for errors, line 5) FAIL: g++.target/i386/mv28.C -std=c++14 (test for errors, line 5) FAIL: g++.target/i386/mv28.C -std=c++14 (test for errors, line 6) FAIL: g++.target/i386/mv28.C -std=c++14 (test for errors, line 6) FAIL: g++.target/i386/mv28.C -std=c++14 (test for errors, line 7) FAIL: g++.target/i386/mv28.C -std=c++14 (test for errors, line 7) FAIL: g++.target/i386/mv28.C -std=c++14 (test for errors, line 8) FAIL: g++.target/i386/mv28.C -std=c++14 (test for errors, line 8) FAIL: g++.target/i386/mv28.C -std=c++14 (test for errors, line 9) FAIL: g++.target/i386/mv28.C -std=c++14 (test for errors, line 9) FAIL: g++.target/i386/mv28.C -std=c++20 (test for errors, line 10) FAIL: g++.target/i386/mv28.C -std=c++20 (test for errors, line 10) FAIL: g++.target/i386/mv28.C -std=c++20 (test for errors, line 11) FAIL: g++.target/i386/mv28.C -std=c++20 (test for errors, line 11) FAIL: g++.target/i386/mv28.C -std=c++20 (test for errors, line 12) FAIL: g++.ta
[r15-2362 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/cpp2a/consteval-prop21.C -std=c++26 (test for excess errors) on Linux/x86_64
On Linux/x86_64,
a9e9f772c7488ac0c09dd92f28890bdab939771a is the first bad commit
commit a9e9f772c7488ac0c09dd92f28890bdab939771a
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: Fri Jul 26 17:20:18 2024 -0400
c++: consteval propagation and templates [PR115986]
caused
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp2a/consteval-prop21.C -std=c++20 (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp2a/consteval-prop21.C -std=c++23 (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp2a/consteval-prop21.C -std=c++26 (test for excess errors)
with GCC configured with
../../gcc/configure
--prefix=/export/users/haochenj/src/gcc-bisect/master/master/r15-2362/usr
--enable-clocale=gnu --with-system-zlib --with-demangler-in-ld
--with-fpmath=sse --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran --enable-cet --without-isl
--enable-libmpx x86_64-linux --disable-bootstrap
To reproduce:
$ cd {build_dir}/gcc && make check
RUNTESTFLAGS="dg.exp=g++.dg/cpp2a/consteval-prop21.C
--target_board='unix{-m32}'"
$ cd {build_dir}/gcc && make check
RUNTESTFLAGS="dg.exp=g++.dg/cpp2a/consteval-prop21.C --target_board='unix{-m32\
-march=cascadelake}'"
(Please do not reply to this email, for question about this report, contact me
at haochen dot jiang at intel.com.)
(If you met problems with cascadelake related, disabling AVX512F in command
line might save that.)
(However, please make sure that there is no potential problems with AVX512.)
[Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-15-2360-gdab0f35fcb4d: Failure on arm
Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. If you have any questions, please follow up on linaro-toolch...@lists.linaro.org mailing list, Libera's #linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain developer on the usual project channel. We appreciate that it might be difficult to find the necessary logs or reproduce the issue locally. If you can't get what you need from our CI within minutes, let us know and we will be happy to help. We track this report status in https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1300 , please let us know if you are looking at the problem and/or when you have a fix. In gcc_check master-arm after: | commit gcc-15-2360-gdab0f35fcb4d | Author: Jason Merrill | Date: Fri Jul 26 15:10:50 2024 -0400 | | c++: improve C++ testsuite default versions | | I wanted to add more cases to the setting of std_list in g++-dg.exp, but | didn't want to do a full scan through the file for each case. So this patch | improves that in two ways: first, by extracting all interesting lines on a | single pass; second, by generating the list more flexibly: now we test every | version mentioned explicitly in the testcase, plus a few more if fewer than | ... 12 lines of the commit log omitted. Results changed to # reset_artifacts: -10 # build_abe gcc: -2 # build_abe dejagnu: -1 # build_abe check_gcc --: 0 # 1 regressions From # reset_artifacts: -10 # build_abe gcc: -2 # build_abe dejagnu: -1 # build_abe check_gcc --: 0 The configuration of this build is: CI config tcwg_gcc_check master-arm -8<--8<--8<-- The information below can be used to reproduce a debug environment: Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/2468/artifact/artifacts Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/2466/artifact/artifacts Reproduce last good and first bad builds: https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/gcc/sha1/dab0f35fcb4dd3ba584422013096c4ebc6bff90d/tcwg_gcc_check/master-arm/reproduction_instructions.txt Full commit : https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/commit/dab0f35fcb4dd3ba584422013096c4ebc6bff90d List of configurations that regressed due to this commit : * tcwg_gcc_check ** master-arm *** Failure *** https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/gcc/sha1/dab0f35fcb4dd3ba584422013096c4ebc6bff90d/tcwg_gcc_check/master-arm/details.txt *** https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/2468/artifact/artifacts
Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-15-2360-gdab0f35fcb4d: Failure on arm
Hi Jason, The regression is ... === g++ tests === Running g++:g++.dg/dg.exp ... FAIL: g++.dg/abi/arm_rtti1.C -std=gnu++26 scan-assembler _ZNKSt9type_infoeqERKS_ It wasn't included in the report due to typo in the scripts. Kind regards, -- Maxim Kuvyrkov https://www.linaro.org > On Jul 28, 2024, at 05:55, ci_not...@linaro.org wrote: > > Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your > patch(es). Please find some details below. If you have any questions, > please follow up on linaro-toolch...@lists.linaro.org mailing list, Libera's > #linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain developer on > the usual project channel. > > We appreciate that it might be difficult to find the necessary logs or > reproduce the issue locally. If you can't get what you need from our CI > within minutes, let us know and we will be happy to help. > > We track this report status in https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1300 , > please let us know if you are looking at the problem and/or when you have a > fix. > > In gcc_check master-arm after: > > | commit gcc-15-2360-gdab0f35fcb4d > | Author: Jason Merrill > | Date: Fri Jul 26 15:10:50 2024 -0400 > | > | c++: improve C++ testsuite default versions > | > | I wanted to add more cases to the setting of std_list in g++-dg.exp, > but > | didn't want to do a full scan through the file for each case. So this > patch > | improves that in two ways: first, by extracting all interesting lines > on a > | single pass; second, by generating the list more flexibly: now we test > every > | version mentioned explicitly in the testcase, plus a few more if fewer > than > | ... 12 lines of the commit log omitted. > > Results changed to > # reset_artifacts: > -10 > # build_abe gcc: > -2 > # build_abe dejagnu: > -1 > # build_abe check_gcc --: > 0 > # 1 regressions > > From > # reset_artifacts: > -10 > # build_abe gcc: > -2 > # build_abe dejagnu: > -1 > # build_abe check_gcc --: > 0 > > The configuration of this build is: > CI config tcwg_gcc_check master-arm > > -8<--8<--8<-- > The information below can be used to reproduce a debug environment: > > Current build : > https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/2468/artifact/artifacts > Reference build : > https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/2466/artifact/artifacts > > Reproduce last good and first bad builds: > https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/gcc/sha1/dab0f35fcb4dd3ba584422013096c4ebc6bff90d/tcwg_gcc_check/master-arm/reproduction_instructions.txt > > Full commit : > https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/commit/dab0f35fcb4dd3ba584422013096c4ebc6bff90d > > List of configurations that regressed due to this commit : > * tcwg_gcc_check > ** master-arm > *** Failure > *** > https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/gcc/sha1/dab0f35fcb4dd3ba584422013096c4ebc6bff90d/tcwg_gcc_check/master-arm/details.txt > *** > https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/2468/artifact/artifacts
Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-15-2233-g8d1af8f904a: Failure on arm
Hi Andi, The regression is ... === g++ tests === Running g++:g++.dg/dg.exp ... FAIL: c-c++-common/musttail12.c -std=c++14 (test for excess errors) FAIL: c-c++-common/musttail12.c -std=c++17 (test for excess errors) FAIL: c-c++-common/musttail12.c -std=c++20 (test for excess errors) FAIL: g++.dg/musttail6.C (test for excess errors) It wasn't included in the report due to typo in the scripts. Kind regards, -- Maxim Kuvyrkov https://www.linaro.org > On Jul 26, 2024, at 19:38, ci_not...@linaro.org wrote: > > Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your > patch(es). Please find some details below. If you have any questions, > please follow up on linaro-toolch...@lists.linaro.org mailing list, Libera's > #linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain developer on > the usual project channel. > > We appreciate that it might be difficult to find the necessary logs or > reproduce the issue locally. If you can't get what you need from our CI > within minutes, let us know and we will be happy to help. > > We track this report status in https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1299 , > please let us know if you are looking at the problem and/or when you have a > fix. > > In gcc_check master-arm after: > > | commit gcc-15-2233-g8d1af8f904a > | Author: Andi Kleen > | Date: Tue Jan 23 23:54:56 2024 -0800 > | > | Add tests for C/C++ musttail attributes > | > | Some adopted from the existing C musttail plugin tests. > | Also extends the ability to query the sibcall capabilities of the > | target. > | > | gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: > | ... 16 lines of the commit log omitted. > > Results changed to > # reset_artifacts: > -10 > # build_abe gcc: > -2 > # build_abe dejagnu: > -1 > # build_abe check_gcc --: > 0 > # 4 regressions > > From > # reset_artifacts: > -10 > # build_abe gcc: > -2 > # build_abe dejagnu: > -1 > # build_abe check_gcc --: > 0 > > The configuration of this build is: > CI config tcwg_gcc_check master-arm > > -8<--8<--8<-- > The information below can be used to reproduce a debug environment: > > Current build : > https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/2460/artifact/artifacts > Reference build : > https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/2459/artifact/artifacts > > Reproduce last good and first bad builds: > https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/gcc/sha1/8d1af8f904a0c08656d976cbf8ca56dba35197b0/tcwg_gcc_check/master-arm/reproduction_instructions.txt > > Full commit : > https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/commit/8d1af8f904a0c08656d976cbf8ca56dba35197b0 > > List of configurations that regressed due to this commit : > * tcwg_gcc_check > ** master-arm > *** Failure > *** > https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/gcc/sha1/8d1af8f904a0c08656d976cbf8ca56dba35197b0/tcwg_gcc_check/master-arm/details.txt > *** > https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/2460/artifact/artifacts
[Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-15-2362-ga9e9f772c748: Failure on arm
Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. If you have any questions, please follow up on linaro-toolch...@lists.linaro.org mailing list, Libera's #linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain developer on the usual project channel. We appreciate that it might be difficult to find the necessary logs or reproduce the issue locally. If you can't get what you need from our CI within minutes, let us know and we will be happy to help. We track this report status in https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1301 , please let us know if you are looking at the problem and/or when you have a fix. In gcc_check master-arm after: | commit gcc-15-2362-ga9e9f772c748 | Author: Jason Merrill | Date: Fri Jul 26 17:20:18 2024 -0400 | | c++: consteval propagation and templates [PR115986] | | Here the call to e() makes us decide to check d() for escalation at EOF, but | while checking it we try to fold_immediate 0_c, and get confused by the | template trees. Let's not mess with escalation for function templates. | | PR c++/115986 | ... 9 lines of the commit log omitted. Results changed to # reset_artifacts: -10 # build_abe gcc: -2 # build_abe dejagnu: -1 # build_abe check_gcc --: 0 # 3 regressions From # reset_artifacts: -10 # build_abe gcc: -2 # build_abe dejagnu: -1 # build_abe check_gcc --: 0 The configuration of this build is: CI config tcwg_gcc_check master-arm -8<--8<--8<-- The information below can be used to reproduce a debug environment: Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/2472/artifact/artifacts Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/2471/artifact/artifacts Reproduce last good and first bad builds: https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/gcc/sha1/a9e9f772c7488ac0c09dd92f28890bdab939771a/tcwg_gcc_check/master-arm/reproduction_instructions.txt Full commit : https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/commit/a9e9f772c7488ac0c09dd92f28890bdab939771a List of configurations that regressed due to this commit : * tcwg_gcc_check ** master-arm *** Failure *** https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/gcc/sha1/a9e9f772c7488ac0c09dd92f28890bdab939771a/tcwg_gcc_check/master-arm/details.txt *** https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/2472/artifact/artifacts
Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-15-2362-ga9e9f772c748: Failure on arm
Hi Jason, For this one the regressions are: === g++ tests === Running g++:g++.dg/dg.exp ... FAIL: g++.dg/cpp2a/consteval-prop21.C -std=c++20 (test for excess errors) FAIL: g++.dg/cpp2a/consteval-prop21.C -std=c++23 (test for excess errors) FAIL: g++.dg/cpp2a/consteval-prop21.C -std=c++26 (test for excess errors) -- Maxim Kuvyrkov https://www.linaro.org > On Jul 28, 2024, at 09:28, ci_not...@linaro.org wrote: > > Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your > patch(es). Please find some details below. If you have any questions, > please follow up on linaro-toolch...@lists.linaro.org mailing list, Libera's > #linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain developer on > the usual project channel. > > We appreciate that it might be difficult to find the necessary logs or > reproduce the issue locally. If you can't get what you need from our CI > within minutes, let us know and we will be happy to help. > > We track this report status in https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1301 , > please let us know if you are looking at the problem and/or when you have a > fix. > > In gcc_check master-arm after: > > | commit gcc-15-2362-ga9e9f772c748 > | Author: Jason Merrill > | Date: Fri Jul 26 17:20:18 2024 -0400 > | > | c++: consteval propagation and templates [PR115986] > | > | Here the call to e() makes us decide to check d() for escalation at > EOF, but > | while checking it we try to fold_immediate 0_c, and get confused by the > | template trees. Let's not mess with escalation for function templates. > | > | PR c++/115986 > | ... 9 lines of the commit log omitted. > > Results changed to > # reset_artifacts: > -10 > # build_abe gcc: > -2 > # build_abe dejagnu: > -1 > # build_abe check_gcc --: > 0 > # 3 regressions > > From > # reset_artifacts: > -10 > # build_abe gcc: > -2 > # build_abe dejagnu: > -1 > # build_abe check_gcc --: > 0 > > The configuration of this build is: > CI config tcwg_gcc_check master-arm > > -8<--8<--8<-- > The information below can be used to reproduce a debug environment: > > Current build : > https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/2472/artifact/artifacts > Reference build : > https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/2471/artifact/artifacts > > Reproduce last good and first bad builds: > https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/gcc/sha1/a9e9f772c7488ac0c09dd92f28890bdab939771a/tcwg_gcc_check/master-arm/reproduction_instructions.txt > > Full commit : > https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/commit/a9e9f772c7488ac0c09dd92f28890bdab939771a > > List of configurations that regressed due to this commit : > * tcwg_gcc_check > ** master-arm > *** Failure > *** > https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/gcc/sha1/a9e9f772c7488ac0c09dd92f28890bdab939771a/tcwg_gcc_check/master-arm/details.txt > *** > https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/2472/artifact/artifacts
