Regressions on master at commit r15-1394 vs commit r15-1392 on Linux/x86_64
Regressions on master at commit r15-1394 vs commit r15-1392 on Linux/x86_64 New failures: FAIL: gcc.dg/c23-tag-enum-6.c (test for errors, line 10) FAIL: gcc.dg/c23-tag-enum-6.c (test for errors, line 13) FAIL: gcc.dg/c23-tag-enum-7.c (test for excess errors) FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/save-temps c_lto_save-temps_0.o-c_lto_save-temps_0.o link, -O -flto -save-temps FAIL: gcc.dg/pr115109.c (test for excess errors) New passes:
Regressions on master at commit r15-1394 vs commit r15-1392 on Linux/i686
Regressions on master at commit r15-1394 vs commit r15-1392 on Linux/i686 New failures: FAIL: gcc.dg/c23-tag-enum-6.c (test for errors, line 10) FAIL: gcc.dg/c23-tag-enum-6.c (test for errors, line 13) FAIL: gcc.dg/c23-tag-enum-7.c (test for excess errors) FAIL: gcc.dg/pr115109.c (test for excess errors) New passes:
Regressions on native/master at commit r15-1394 vs commit r15-1392 on Linux/x86_64
Regressions on master at commit r15-1394 vs commit r15-1392 on Linux/x86_64 New failures: FAIL: gcc.dg/c23-tag-enum-6.c (test for errors, line 10) FAIL: gcc.dg/c23-tag-enum-6.c (test for errors, line 13) FAIL: gcc.dg/c23-tag-enum-7.c (test for excess errors) FAIL: gcc.dg/pr115109.c (test for excess errors) New passes:
Regressions on master at commit r15-1403 vs commit r15-1394 on Linux/x86_64
Regressions on master at commit r15-1403 vs commit r15-1394 on Linux/x86_64 New failures: New passes: FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/save-temps c_lto_save-temps_0.o-c_lto_save-temps_0.o link, -O -flto -save-temps
[r15-1394 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/pr115109.c (test for excess errors) on Linux/x86_64
On Linux/x86_64,
c9b96a68860bfdee49d40b4a844af7c5ef69cd12 is the first bad commit
commit c9b96a68860bfdee49d40b4a844af7c5ef69cd12
Author: Martin Uecker
Date: Sat May 18 22:00:04 2024 +0200
c23: Fix for redeclared enumerator initialized with different type
[PR115109]
caused
FAIL: gcc.dg/c23-tag-enum-6.c (test for errors, line 10)
FAIL: gcc.dg/c23-tag-enum-6.c (test for errors, line 13)
FAIL: gcc.dg/c23-tag-enum-7.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/pr115109.c (test for excess errors)
with GCC configured with
../../gcc/configure
--prefix=/export/users/haochenj/src/gcc-bisect/master/master/r15-1394/usr
--enable-clocale=gnu --with-system-zlib --with-demangler-in-ld
--with-fpmath=sse --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran --enable-cet --without-isl
--enable-libmpx x86_64-linux --disable-bootstrap
To reproduce:
$ cd {build_dir}/gcc && make check RUNTESTFLAGS="dg.exp=gcc.dg/c23-tag-enum-6.c
--target_board='unix{-m32}'"
$ cd {build_dir}/gcc && make check RUNTESTFLAGS="dg.exp=gcc.dg/c23-tag-enum-6.c
--target_board='unix{-m32\ -march=cascadelake}'"
$ cd {build_dir}/gcc && make check RUNTESTFLAGS="dg.exp=gcc.dg/c23-tag-enum-7.c
--target_board='unix{-m32}'"
$ cd {build_dir}/gcc && make check RUNTESTFLAGS="dg.exp=gcc.dg/c23-tag-enum-7.c
--target_board='unix{-m32\ -march=cascadelake}'"
$ cd {build_dir}/gcc && make check RUNTESTFLAGS="dg.exp=gcc.dg/pr115109.c
--target_board='unix{-m32}'"
$ cd {build_dir}/gcc && make check RUNTESTFLAGS="dg.exp=gcc.dg/pr115109.c
--target_board='unix{-m32\ -march=cascadelake}'"
(Please do not reply to this email, for question about this report, contact me
at haochen dot jiang at intel.com.)
(If you met problems with cascadelake related, disabling AVX512F in command
line might save that.)
(However, please make sure that there is no potential problems with AVX512.)
Regressions on master at commit r15-1416 vs commit r15-1409 on Linux/x86_64
Regressions on master at commit r15-1416 vs commit r15-1409 on Linux/x86_64 New failures: FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/save-temps c_lto_save-temps_0.o-c_lto_save-temps_0.o link, -O -flto -save-temps New passes:
[Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-15-1394-gc9b96a68860: FAIL: 4 regressions on arm
Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. If you have any questions, please follow up on linaro-toolch...@lists.linaro.org mailing list, Libera's #linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain developer on the usual project channel. We appreciate that it might be difficult to find the necessary logs or reproduce the issue locally. If you can't get what you need from our CI within minutes, let us know and we will be happy to help. We track this report status in https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1262 , please let us know if you are looking at the problem and/or when you have a fix. In gcc_check master-arm after: | commit gcc-15-1394-gc9b96a68860 | Author: Martin Uecker | Date: Sat May 18 22:00:04 2024 +0200 | | c23: Fix for redeclared enumerator initialized with different type [PR115109] | | c23 specifies that the type of a redeclared enumerator is the one of the | previous declaration. Convert initializers with different type accordingly | and emit an error when the value does not fit. | | 2024-06-01 Martin Uecker | ... 12 lines of the commit log omitted. FAIL: 4 regressions regressions.sum: === gcc tests === Running gcc:gcc.dg/dg.exp ... FAIL: gcc.dg/c23-tag-enum-6.c (test for errors, line 10) FAIL: gcc.dg/c23-tag-enum-6.c (test for errors, line 13) FAIL: gcc.dg/c23-tag-enum-7.c (test for excess errors) FAIL: gcc.dg/pr115109.c (test for excess errors) You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in - https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/2279/artifact/artifacts/00-sumfiles/ The full lists of regressions and progressions as well as configure and make commands are in - https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/2279/artifact/artifacts/notify/ The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in - https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/2279/artifact/artifacts/sumfiles/xfails.xfail The configuration of this build is: CI config tcwg_gcc_check master-arm -8<--8<--8<-- The information below can be used to reproduce a debug environment: Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/2279/artifact/artifacts Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/2277/artifact/artifacts Reproduce last good and first bad builds: https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/gcc/sha1/c9b96a68860bfdee49d40b4a844af7c5ef69cd12/tcwg_gcc_check/master-arm/reproduction_instructions.txt Full commit : https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/commit/c9b96a68860bfdee49d40b4a844af7c5ef69cd12 List of configurations that regressed due to this commit : * tcwg_gcc_check ** master-arm *** FAIL: 4 regressions *** https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/gcc/sha1/c9b96a68860bfdee49d40b4a844af7c5ef69cd12/tcwg_gcc_check/master-arm/details.txt *** https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/2279/artifact/artifacts
