Regressions on releases/gcc-14 at commit r14-10271 vs commit r14-10263 on Linux/x86_64
Regressions on releases/gcc-14 at commit r14-10271 vs commit r14-10263 on Linux/x86_64 New failures: New passes: FAIL: 30_threads/async/async.cc -std=gnu++17 execution test
Regressions on master at commit r15-986 vs commit r15-974 on Linux/x86_64
Regressions on master at commit r15-986 vs commit r15-974 on Linux/x86_64 New failures: FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr86722.c scan-assembler-times (?n)(?:andnpd|andpd) 1 New passes:
Regressions on native/releases/gcc-14 at commit r14-10271 vs commit r14-10263 on Linux/x86_64
Regressions on releases/gcc-14 at commit r14-10271 vs commit r14-10263 on Linux/x86_64 New failures: FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx10_1-25.c (test for excess errors) FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx10_1-25.c (test for excess errors) FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx10_1-26.c (test for excess errors) FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx10_1-26.c (test for excess errors) New passes:
Regressions on native/master at commit r15-986 vs commit r15-974 on Linux/x86_64
Regressions on master at commit r15-986 vs commit r15-974 on Linux/x86_64 New failures: FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx10_1-25.c (test for excess errors) FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx10_1-25.c (test for excess errors) FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx10_1-26.c (test for excess errors) FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx10_1-26.c (test for excess errors) FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr86722.c scan-assembler-times (?n)(?:andnpd|andpd) 1 New passes:
[r14-10271 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx10_1-25.c (test for excess errors) on Linux/x86_64
On Linux/x86_64,
97474ba2075dc3c397bbc2861646561dcfd13386 is the first bad commit
commit 97474ba2075dc3c397bbc2861646561dcfd13386
Author: Haochen Jiang
Date: Mon May 20 15:52:32 2024 +0800
Add AVX10.1 target_clones support
caused
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx10_1-25.c (test for excess errors)
with GCC configured with
../../gcc/configure
--prefix=/export/users/haochenj/src/gcc-bisect/gcc-14/releases/gcc-14/r14-10271/usr
--enable-clocale=gnu --with-system-zlib --with-demangler-in-ld
--with-fpmath=sse --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran --enable-cet --without-isl
--enable-libmpx x86_64-linux --disable-bootstrap
To reproduce:
$ cd {build_dir}/gcc && make check
RUNTESTFLAGS="i386.exp=gcc.target/i386/avx10_1-25.c --target_board='unix{-m32\
-march=cascadelake}'"
$ cd {build_dir}/gcc && make check
RUNTESTFLAGS="i386.exp=gcc.target/i386/avx10_1-25.c --target_board='unix{-m64\
-march=cascadelake}'"
(Please do not reply to this email, for question about this report, contact me
at haochen dot jiang at intel.com.)
(If you met problems with cascadelake related, disabling AVX512F in command
line might save that.)
(However, please make sure that there is no potential problems with AVX512.)
[r15-984 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr86722.c scan-assembler-times (?n)(?:andnpd|andpd) 1 on Linux/x86_64
On Linux/x86_64,
ac306de7d5100d3682eae2270995a9abbe19db38 is the first bad commit
commit ac306de7d5100d3682eae2270995a9abbe19db38
Author: liuhongt
Date: Fri May 31 14:38:07 2024 +0800
Add some preference for floating point rtl ifcvt when sse4.1 is not
available
caused
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr86722.c scan-assembler-times (?n)(?:andnpd|andpd) 1
with GCC configured with
../../gcc/configure
--prefix=/export/users/haochenj/src/gcc-bisect/master/master/r15-984/usr
--enable-clocale=gnu --with-system-zlib --with-demangler-in-ld
--with-fpmath=sse --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran --enable-cet --without-isl
--enable-libmpx x86_64-linux --disable-bootstrap
To reproduce:
$ cd {build_dir}/gcc && make check
RUNTESTFLAGS="i386.exp=gcc.target/i386/pr86722.c --target_board='unix{-m64\
-march=cascadelake}'"
(Please do not reply to this email, for question about this report, contact me
at haochen dot jiang at intel.com.)
(If you met problems with cascadelake related, disabling AVX512F in command
line might save that.)
(However, please make sure that there is no potential problems with AVX512.)
[r15-983 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx10_1-25.c (test for excess errors) on Linux/x86_64
On Linux/x86_64,
1f2ca510065a2033bac408eb5a960ef0126f25cc is the first bad commit
commit 1f2ca510065a2033bac408eb5a960ef0126f25cc
Author: Haochen Jiang
Date: Mon May 20 15:52:32 2024 +0800
Add AVX10.1 target_clones support
caused
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx10_1-25.c (test for excess errors)
with GCC configured with
../../gcc/configure
--prefix=/export/users/haochenj/src/gcc-bisect/master/master/r15-983/usr
--enable-clocale=gnu --with-system-zlib --with-demangler-in-ld
--with-fpmath=sse --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran --enable-cet --without-isl
--enable-libmpx x86_64-linux --disable-bootstrap
To reproduce:
$ cd {build_dir}/gcc && make check
RUNTESTFLAGS="i386.exp=gcc.target/i386/avx10_1-25.c --target_board='unix{-m32\
-march=cascadelake}'"
$ cd {build_dir}/gcc && make check
RUNTESTFLAGS="i386.exp=gcc.target/i386/avx10_1-25.c --target_board='unix{-m64\
-march=cascadelake}'"
(Please do not reply to this email, for question about this report, contact me
at haochen dot jiang at intel.com.)
(If you met problems with cascadelake related, disabling AVX512F in command
line might save that.)
(However, please make sure that there is no potential problems with AVX512.)
[Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-15-491-gc290e6a0b7a: FAIL: 1 regressions on arm
Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. If you have any questions, please follow up on linaro-toolch...@lists.linaro.org mailing list, Libera's #linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain developer on the usual project channel. We appreciate that it might be difficult to find the necessary logs or reproduce the issue locally. If you can't get what you need from our CI within minutes, let us know and we will be happy to help. We track this report status in https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1229 , please let us know if you are looking at the problem and/or when you have a fix. In gcc_check master-arm after: | commit gcc-15-491-gc290e6a0b7a | Author: Richard Biener | Date: Tue May 14 11:13:51 2024 +0200 | | tree-optimization/99954 - redo loop distribution memcpy recognition fix | | The following revisits the fix for PR99954 which was observed as | causing missed memcpy recognition and instead using memmove for | non-aliasing copies. While the original fix mitigated bogus | recognition of memcpy the root cause was not properly identified. | The root cause is dr_analyze_indices "failing" to handle union | ... 19 lines of the commit log omitted. FAIL: 1 regressions regressions.sum: === gcc tests === Running gcc:gcc.target/arm/simd/simd.exp ... FAIL: gcc.target/arm/simd/mve-vabs.c scan-assembler-times memmove 3 You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in - https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/2205/artifact/artifacts/00-sumfiles/ The full lists of regressions and progressions as well as configure and make commands are in - https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/2205/artifact/artifacts/notify/ The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in - https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/2205/artifact/artifacts/sumfiles/xfails.xfail The configuration of this build is: CI config tcwg_gcc_check master-arm -8<--8<--8<-- The information below can be used to reproduce a debug environment: Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/2205/artifact/artifacts Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/2204/artifact/artifacts Reproduce last good and first bad builds: https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/gcc/sha1/c290e6a0b7a9de5692963affc6627a4af7dc2411/tcwg_gcc_check/master-arm/reproduction_instructions.txt Full commit : https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/commit/c290e6a0b7a9de5692963affc6627a4af7dc2411 List of configurations that regressed due to this commit : * tcwg_gcc_check ** master-arm *** FAIL: 1 regressions *** https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/gcc/sha1/c290e6a0b7a9de5692963affc6627a4af7dc2411/tcwg_gcc_check/master-arm/details.txt *** https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/2205/artifact/artifacts
Regressions on master at commit r15-1001 vs commit r15-996 on Linux/x86_64
Regressions on master at commit r15-1001 vs commit r15-996 on Linux/x86_64 New failures: FAIL: 30_threads/future/members/poll.cc -std=gnu++17 execution test New passes:
Regressions on native/master at commit r15-998 vs commit r15-995 on Linux/x86_64
Regressions on master at commit r15-998 vs commit r15-995 on Linux/x86_64 New failures: FAIL: libgomp.c/../libgomp.c-c++-common/for-11.c execution test FAIL: libgomp.c/../libgomp.c-c++-common/for-12.c execution test FAIL: libgomp.c/../libgomp.c-c++-common/for-15.c execution test FAIL: libgomp.c/../libgomp.c-c++-common/for-9.c execution test New passes:
Regressions on native/master at commit r15-1001 vs commit r15-998 on Linux/x86_64
Regressions on master at commit r15-1001 vs commit r15-998 on Linux/x86_64 New failures: New passes: FAIL: libgomp.c/../libgomp.c-c++-common/for-11.c execution test FAIL: libgomp.c/../libgomp.c-c++-common/for-12.c execution test FAIL: libgomp.c/../libgomp.c-c++-common/for-15.c execution test FAIL: libgomp.c/../libgomp.c-c++-common/for-9.c execution test
[Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-15-579-ga9251ab3c91: FAIL: 8 regressions on arm
Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. If you have any questions, please follow up on linaro-toolch...@lists.linaro.org mailing list, Libera's #linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain developer on the usual project channel. We appreciate that it might be difficult to find the necessary logs or reproduce the issue locally. If you can't get what you need from our CI within minutes, let us know and we will be happy to help. We track this report status in https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1230 , please let us know if you are looking at the problem and/or when you have a fix. In gcc_check master-arm after: | commit gcc-15-579-ga9251ab3c91 | Author: Richard Biener | Date: Thu May 16 12:35:28 2024 +0200 | | wrong code with points-to and volatile | | The following fixes points-to analysis which ignores the fact that | volatile qualified refs can result in any pointer. | | * tree-ssa-structalias.cc (get_constraint_for_1): For | volatile referenced or decls use ANYTHING. | ... 2 lines of the commit log omitted. FAIL: 8 regressions regressions.sum: === libgomp tests === Running libgomp:libgomp.oacc-c++/c++.exp ... FAIL: libgomp.oacc-c++/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/acc_prof-kernels-1.c -DACC_DEVICE_TYPE_host=1 -DACC_MEM_SHARED=1 -foffload=disable -O2 at line 190 (test for warnings, line 185) FAIL: libgomp.oacc-c++/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/acc_prof-kernels-1.c -DACC_DEVICE_TYPE_host=1 -DACC_MEM_SHARED=1 -foffload=disable -O2 at line 221 (test for warnings, line 214) FAIL: libgomp.oacc-c++/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/acc_prof-kernels-1.c -DACC_DEVICE_TYPE_host=1 -DACC_MEM_SHARED=1 -foffload=disable -O2 at line 252 (test for warnings, line 245) FAIL: libgomp.oacc-c++/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/acc_prof-kernels-1.c -DACC_DEVICE_TYPE_host=1 -DACC_MEM_SHARED=1 -foffload=disable -O2 (test for excess errors) Running libgomp:libgomp.oacc-c/c.exp ... FAIL: libgomp.oacc-c/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/acc_prof-kernels-1.c -DACC_DEVICE_TYPE_host=1 -DACC_MEM_SHARED=1 -foffload=disable -O2 at line 190 (test for warnings, line 185) ... and 4 more entries You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in - https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/2209/artifact/artifacts/00-sumfiles/ The full lists of regressions and progressions as well as configure and make commands are in - https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/2209/artifact/artifacts/notify/ The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in - https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/2209/artifact/artifacts/sumfiles/xfails.xfail The configuration of this build is: CI config tcwg_gcc_check master-arm -8<--8<--8<-- The information below can be used to reproduce a debug environment: Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/2209/artifact/artifacts Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/2208/artifact/artifacts Reproduce last good and first bad builds: https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/gcc/sha1/a9251ab3c91c8c559d0306838575a666ae62dff4/tcwg_gcc_check/master-arm/reproduction_instructions.txt Full commit : https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/commit/a9251ab3c91c8c559d0306838575a666ae62dff4 List of configurations that regressed due to this commit : * tcwg_gcc_check ** master-arm *** FAIL: 8 regressions *** https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/gcc/sha1/a9251ab3c91c8c559d0306838575a666ae62dff4/tcwg_gcc_check/master-arm/details.txt *** https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/2209/artifact/artifacts
RE: [r15-983 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx10_1-25.c (test for excess errors) on Linux/x86_64
The fail is expected since -march=cascadelake -mavx10.1-256 will lead to a
warning.
Also, we could not use -mno-avx512f with -mavx10.1-256, which also lead to a
warning.
> -Original Message-
> From: haochen.jiang
> Sent: Monday, June 3, 2024 10:22 PM
> To: Jiang, Haochen ; gcc-regression@gcc.gnu.org;
> gcc-patc...@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: [r15-983 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx10_1-25.c (test for
> excess errors) on Linux/x86_64
>
> On Linux/x86_64,
>
> 1f2ca510065a2033bac408eb5a960ef0126f25cc is the first bad commit
> commit 1f2ca510065a2033bac408eb5a960ef0126f25cc
> Author: Haochen Jiang
> Date: Mon May 20 15:52:32 2024 +0800
>
> Add AVX10.1 target_clones support
>
> caused
>
> FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx10_1-25.c (test for excess errors)
>
> with GCC configured with
>
> ../../gcc/configure --prefix=/export/users/haochenj/src/gcc-
> bisect/master/master/r15-983/usr --enable-clocale=gnu --with-system-zlib --
> with-demangler-in-ld --with-fpmath=sse --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran --
> enable-cet --without-isl --enable-libmpx x86_64-linux --disable-bootstrap
>
> To reproduce:
>
> $ cd {build_dir}/gcc && make check
> RUNTESTFLAGS="i386.exp=gcc.target/i386/avx10_1-25.c --
> target_board='unix{-m32\ -march=cascadelake}'"
> $ cd {build_dir}/gcc && make check
> RUNTESTFLAGS="i386.exp=gcc.target/i386/avx10_1-25.c --
> target_board='unix{-m64\ -march=cascadelake}'"
>
> (Please do not reply to this email, for question about this report, contact
> me at
> haochen dot jiang at intel.com.) (If you met problems with cascadelake
> related, disabling AVX512F in command line might save that.) (However,
> please make sure that there is no potential problems with AVX512.)
