Regressions on master at commit r14-9421 vs commit r14-9418 on Linux/x86_64

2024-03-11 Thread H.J. Lu via Gcc-regression
Regressions on master at commit r14-9421 vs commit r14-9418 on Linux/x86_64
New failures:
FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/convert-dfp-2.c   -O2 -flto -fuse-linker-plugin 
-fno-fat-lto-objects  (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/convert-dfp.c   -O2 -flto -fuse-linker-plugin 
-fno-fat-lto-objects  (test for excess errors)

New passes:


Regressions on master at commit r14-9422 vs commit r14-9417 on Linux/x86_64

2024-03-11 Thread H.J. Lu via Gcc-regression
Regressions on master at commit r14-9422 vs commit r14-9417 on Linux/x86_64
New failures:
FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/save-temps c_lto_save-temps_0.o-c_lto_save-temps_0.o link,  -O 
-flto -save-temps

New passes:
FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/convert-dfp-2.c   -O2 -flto -fuse-linker-plugin 
-fno-fat-lto-objects  (test for excess errors)


Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-14-8492-g1a8261e047f: FAIL: 3 regressions on arm

2024-03-11 Thread Maxim Kuvyrkov via Gcc-regression
> On Jan 30, 2024, at 00:35, ci_notify--- via Gcc-regression 
>  wrote:
> 
> Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your 
> patch(es).  Please find some details below.  If you have any questions, 
> please follow up on linaro-toolch...@lists.linaro.org mailing list, Libera's 
> #linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain developer on 
> the usual project channel.
> 
> We appreciate that it might be difficult to find the necessary logs or 
> reproduce the issue locally. If you can't get what you need from our CI 
> within minutes, let us know and we will be happy to help.
> 
> We track this report status in https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1132 , 
> please let us know if you are looking at the problem and/or when you have a 
> fix.
> 
> In gcc_check master-arm after:
> 
>  | commit gcc-14-8492-g1a8261e047f
>  | Author: Richard Sandiford 
>  | Date:   Mon Jan 29 12:33:08 2024 +
>  | 
>  | vect: Tighten vect_determine_precisions_from_range [PR113281]
>  | 
>  | This was another PR caused by the way that
>  | vect_determine_precisions_from_range handles shifts.  We tried to
>  | narrow 32768 >> x to a 16-bit shift based on range information for
>  | the inputs and outputs, with vect_recog_over_widening_pattern
>  | (after PR110828) adjusting the shift amount.  But this doesn't
>  | ... 36 lines of the commit log omitted.
> 
> FAIL: 3 regressions
> 
> regressions.sum:
> === gcc tests ===
> 
> Running gcc:gcc.target/arm/simd/simd.exp ...
> FAIL: gcc.target/arm/simd/mve-vshr.c scan-assembler-times 
> vneg.s[0-9]+\\tq[0-9]+, q[0-9]+ 6
> FAIL: gcc.target/arm/simd/mve-vshr.c scan-assembler-times 
> vshl.s[0-9]+\\tq[0-9]+, q[0-9]+ 3
> FAIL: gcc.target/arm/simd/mve-vshr.c scan-assembler-times 
> vshl.u[0-9]+\\tq[0-9]+, q[0-9]+ 3

Hi Richard,

Could you please check whether the above tests need an update after your patch? 
 We see these tests now consistently failing across all 32-bit ARM 
configurations that we track (see [1]).

As an example, our configure options for arm-linux-gnueabihf that show the 
failure are at [2].

[1] https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1132

[2] 
https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/artifacts/notify/configure-make.txt/*view*/

Thanks!

--
Maxim Kuvyrkov
https://www.linaro.org


> 
> === Results Summary ===
> 
> You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in
> - 
> https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/1636/artifact/artifacts/00-sumfiles/
>  .
> The full lists of regressions and progressions are in
> - 
> https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/1636/artifact/artifacts/notify/
>  .
> The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in
> - 
> https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/1636/artifact/artifacts/sumfiles/xfails.xfail
>  .
> 
> The configuration of this build is:
> CI config tcwg_gcc_check master-arm
> 
> -8<--8<--8<--
> The information below can be used to reproduce a debug environment:
> 
> Current build   : 
> https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/1636/artifact/artifacts
> Reference build : 
> https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/1635/artifact/artifacts
> 
> Reproduce last good and first bad builds: 
> https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/gcc/sha1/1a8261e047f7a2c2b0afb95716f7615cba718cd1/tcwg_gcc_check/master-arm/reproduction_instructions.txt
> 
> Full commit : 
> https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/commit/1a8261e047f7a2c2b0afb95716f7615cba718cd1
> 
> List of configurations that regressed due to this commit :
> * tcwg_gcc_check
> ** master-arm
> *** FAIL: 3 regressions
> *** 
> https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/gcc/sha1/1a8261e047f7a2c2b0afb95716f7615cba718cd1/tcwg_gcc_check/master-arm/details.txt
> *** 
> https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/1636/artifact/artifacts



Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-14-8680-g2f14c0dbb78: FAIL: 3 regressions on arm

2024-03-11 Thread Maxim Kuvyrkov via Gcc-regression
> On Feb 1, 2024, at 16:07, ci_notify--- via Gcc-regression 
>  wrote:
> 
> Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your 
> patch(es).  Please find some details below.  If you have any questions, 
> please follow up on linaro-toolch...@lists.linaro.org mailing list, Libera's 
> #linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain developer on 
> the usual project channel.
> 
> We appreciate that it might be difficult to find the necessary logs or 
> reproduce the issue locally. If you can't get what you need from our CI 
> within minutes, let us know and we will be happy to help.
> 
> We track this report status in https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1140 , 
> please let us know if you are looking at the problem and/or when you have a 
> fix.
> 
> In gcc_check master-arm after:
> 
>  | commit gcc-14-8680-g2f14c0dbb78
>  | Author: Roger Sayle 
>  | Date:   Thu Feb 1 06:10:42 2024 +
>  | 
>  | PR target/113560: Enhance is_widening_mult_rhs_p.
>  | 
>  | This patch resolves PR113560, a code quality regression from GCC12
>  | affecting x86_64, by enhancing the middle-end's tree-ssa-math-opts.cc
>  | to recognize more instances of widening multiplications.
>  | 
>  | The widening multiplication perception code identifies cases like:
>  | ... 116 lines of the commit log omitted.
> 
> FAIL: 3 regressions
> 
> regressions.sum:
> === gcc tests ===
> 
> Running gcc:gcc.target/arm/arm.exp ...
> FAIL: gcc.target/arm/wmul-5.c scan-assembler umlal
> FAIL: gcc.target/arm/wmul-6.c scan-assembler smlalbb
> FAIL: gcc.target/arm/wmul-7.c scan-assembler umlal

Hi Roger,

Your patch seems to regress the above 3 tests for all 32-bit ARM targets (see 
[1]).  Would you please check if the regressions can be avoided?

For reference, here are configure options we use for arm-linux-gnueabihf 
cross-toolchain: [2].

[1] https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1140
[2] 
https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc--master-arm-build/1303/artifact/artifacts/notify/configure-make.txt/*view*/
 

Thanks!

--
Maxim Kuvyrkov
https://www.linaro.org


> 
> 
> You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in
> - 
> https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/1650/artifact/artifacts/00-sumfiles/
> The full lists of regressions and progressions as well as configure and make 
> commands are in
> - 
> https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/1650/artifact/artifacts/notify/
> The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in
> - 
> https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/1650/artifact/artifacts/sumfiles/xfails.xfail
> 
> The configuration of this build is:
> CI config tcwg_gcc_check master-arm
> 
> -8<--8<--8<--
> The information below can be used to reproduce a debug environment:
> 
> Current build   : 
> https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/1650/artifact/artifacts
> Reference build : 
> https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/1649/artifact/artifacts
> 
> Reproduce last good and first bad builds: 
> https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/gcc/sha1/2f14c0dbb789852947cb58fdf7d3162413f053fa/tcwg_gcc_check/master-arm/reproduction_instructions.txt
> 
> Full commit : 
> https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/commit/2f14c0dbb789852947cb58fdf7d3162413f053fa
> 
> List of configurations that regressed due to this commit :
> * tcwg_gcc_check
> ** master-arm
> *** FAIL: 3 regressions
> *** 
> https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/gcc/sha1/2f14c0dbb789852947cb58fdf7d3162413f053fa/tcwg_gcc_check/master-arm/details.txt
> *** 
> https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/1650/artifact/artifacts



[Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-14-9401-gcebbaa2a845: FAIL: 5 regressions: 5 progressions on master-thumb_m55_hard_eabi

2024-03-11 Thread ci_notify--- via Gcc-regression
Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your 
patch(es).  Please find some details below.  If you have any questions, please 
follow up on linaro-toolch...@lists.linaro.org mailing list, Libera's 
#linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain developer on the 
usual project channel.

We appreciate that it might be difficult to find the necessary logs or 
reproduce the issue locally. If you can't get what you need from our CI within 
minutes, let us know and we will be happy to help.

We track this report status in https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1175 , 
please let us know if you are looking at the problem and/or when you have a fix.

In  arm-eabi cortex-m55 hard after:

  | commit gcc-14-9401-gcebbaa2a845
  | Author: Vladimir N. Makarov 
  | Date:   Fri Mar 8 14:48:33 2024 -0500
  | 
  | [PR113790][LRA]: Fixing LRA ICE on riscv64
  | 
  |   LRA failed to consider all insn alternatives when non-reload pseudo
  | did not get a hard register.  This resulted in failure to generate
  | code by LRA.  The patch fixes this problem.
  | 
  | gcc/ChangeLog:
  | ... 4 lines of the commit log omitted.

FAIL: 5 regressions: 5 progressions

regressions.sum:
=== g++ tests ===

Running g++:g++.dg/torture/dg-torture.exp ...
FAIL: c-c++-common/torture/vshuf-v16qi.c -O3 -g  (internal compiler error: in 
lra_assign, at lra-assigns.cc:1657)
FAIL: c-c++-common/torture/vshuf-v2di.c -O3 -g  (internal compiler error: in 
lra_assign, at lra-assigns.cc:1657)
FAIL: c-c++-common/torture/vshuf-v4sf.c -O3 -g  (internal compiler error: in 
lra_assign, at lra-assigns.cc:1657)
FAIL: c-c++-common/torture/vshuf-v4si.c -O3 -g  (internal compiler error: in 
lra_assign, at lra-assigns.cc:1657)
FAIL: c-c++-common/torture/vshuf-v8hi.c -O3 -g  (internal compiler error: in 
lra_assign, at lra-assigns.cc:1657)


progressions.sum:
=== g++ tests ===

Running g++:g++.dg/torture/dg-torture.exp ...
FAIL: c-c++-common/torture/vshuf-v16qi.c -O3 -g  (internal compiler error: in 
lra_assign, at lra-assigns.cc:1651)
FAIL: c-c++-common/torture/vshuf-v2di.c -O3 -g  (internal compiler error: in 
lra_assign, at lra-assigns.cc:1651)
FAIL: c-c++-common/torture/vshuf-v4sf.c -O3 -g  (internal compiler error: in 
lra_assign, at lra-assigns.cc:1651)
FAIL: c-c++-common/torture/vshuf-v4si.c -O3 -g  (internal compiler error: in 
lra_assign, at lra-assigns.cc:1651)
FAIL: c-c++-common/torture/vshuf-v8hi.c -O3 -g  (internal compiler error: in 
lra_assign, at lra-assigns.cc:1651)


You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in
 - 
https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_embed_check_gcc--master-thumb_m55_hard_eabi-build/353/artifact/artifacts/00-sumfiles/
The full lists of regressions and progressions as well as configure and make 
commands are in
 - 
https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_embed_check_gcc--master-thumb_m55_hard_eabi-build/353/artifact/artifacts/notify/
The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in
 - 
https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_embed_check_gcc--master-thumb_m55_hard_eabi-build/353/artifact/artifacts/sumfiles/xfails.xfail

The configuration of this build is:
CI config tcwg_gnu_embed_check_gcc arm-eabi -mthumb 
-march=armv8.1-m.main+mve.fp+fp.dp -mtune=cortex-m55 -mfloat-abi=hard -mfpu=auto

-8<--8<--8<--
The information below can be used to reproduce a debug environment:

Current build   : 
https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_embed_check_gcc--master-thumb_m55_hard_eabi-build/353/artifact/artifacts
Reference build : 
https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_embed_check_gcc--master-thumb_m55_hard_eabi-build/352/artifact/artifacts

Reproduce last good and first bad builds: 
https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/gcc/sha1/cebbaa2a84586a7345837f74a53b7a0263bf29ee/tcwg_gnu_embed_check_gcc/master-thumb_m55_hard_eabi/reproduction_instructions.txt

Full commit : 
https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/commit/cebbaa2a84586a7345837f74a53b7a0263bf29ee

List of configurations that regressed due to this commit :
* tcwg_gnu_embed_check_gcc
** master-thumb_m55_hard_eabi
*** FAIL: 5 regressions: 5 progressions
*** 
https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/gcc/sha1/cebbaa2a84586a7345837f74a53b7a0263bf29ee/tcwg_gnu_embed_check_gcc/master-thumb_m55_hard_eabi/details.txt
*** 
https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_embed_check_gcc--master-thumb_m55_hard_eabi-build/353/artifact/artifacts


Regressions on native/master at commit r14-9430 vs commit r14-9426 on Linux/x86_64

2024-03-11 Thread H. J. Lu via Gcc-regression
Regressions on native/master at commit r14-9430 vs commit r14-9426 on 
Linux/x86_64
New failures:

New passes:
FAIL: gcc.dg/gomp/bad-array-section-c-3.c  at line 14 (test for warnings, line 
12)
FAIL: gcc.dg/gomp/bad-array-section-c-3.c  at line 14 (test for warnings, line 
12)


Regressions on master at commit r14-9426 vs commit r14-9421 on Linux/x86_64

2024-03-11 Thread H.J. Lu via Gcc-regression
Regressions on master at commit r14-9426 vs commit r14-9421 on Linux/x86_64
New failures:

New passes:
FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/convert-dfp-2.c   -O2 -flto -fuse-linker-plugin 
-fno-fat-lto-objects  (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/convert-dfp.c   -O2 -flto -fuse-linker-plugin 
-fno-fat-lto-objects  (test for excess errors)


Regressions on master at commit r14-9431 vs commit r14-9426 on Linux/i686

2024-03-11 Thread H.J. Lu via Gcc-regression
Regressions on master at commit r14-9431 vs commit r14-9426 on Linux/i686
New failures:

New passes:
FAIL: gcc.dg/gomp/bad-array-section-c-3.c  at line 14 (test for warnings, line 
12)


Regressions on master at commit r14-9431 vs commit r14-9426 on Linux/i686

2024-03-11 Thread H.J. Lu via Gcc-regression
Regressions on master at commit r14-9431 vs commit r14-9426 on Linux/i686
New failures:

New passes:
FAIL: gcc.dg/gomp/bad-array-section-c-3.c  at line 14 (test for warnings, line 
12)


Regressions on native/releases/gcc-13 at commit r13-8419 vs commit r13-8411 on Linux/x86_64

2024-03-11 Thread H. J. Lu via Gcc-regression
Regressions on native/releases/gcc-13 at commit r13-8419 vs commit r13-8411 on 
Linux/x86_64
New failures:

New passes:
FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/convert-dfp-2.c   -O2 -flto -fuse-linker-plugin 
-fno-fat-lto-objects  (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/convert-dfp.c   -O2 -flto -fuse-linker-plugin 
-fno-fat-lto-objects  (test for excess errors)