Re: [Patch, fortran] PR fortran/100120/100816/100818/100819/100821 problems raised by aggregate data types
Hi José, Patch tested only on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. Also tested on darwin20. The patch is OK for me. Thanks for the work, Dominique
Re: [Patch, fortran] PR fortran/100120/100816/100818/100819/100821 problems raised by aggregate data types
Since the PRs are about wrong code, I think the patch should be back ported to at least GCC11. Dominique Le 2021-06-04 17:24, Paul Richard Thomas a écrit : Hi José, I can second Dominique's thanks. I applied it to my tree when you first posted, set the regtest in motion and have not been able to return to gfortran matters since. OK for master. I am especially happy that you have tackled this area and have rationalised it to a substantial degree. The wheel keeps being re-invented by different people, largely for a lack of documentation or coherent self-documentation. I know, as one of the guilty ones. Regards Paul On Thu, 3 Jun 2021 at 16:05, dhumieres.dominique--- via Fortran wrote: Hi José, Patch tested only on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. Also tested on darwin20. The patch is OK for me. Thanks for the work, Dominique -- "If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough" - Albert Einstein
Re:[Patch, fortran] PR fortran/93308/93963/94327/94331/97046 problems raised by descriptor handling
Hi José, Patch tested only on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. Also tested on darwin20. The patch is OK for me provided the updated PR94331.c test file replaces the original one. Since the PRs are about wrong code, I think the patch should be backported to at least GCC11 (applied and regtested OK). Thanks for the work, Dominique
Re: [Patch, fortran v2] PR fortran/93308/93963/94327/94331/97046 problems raised by descriptor handling
Le 2021-06-06 19:58, dhumieres.domini...@free.fr a écrit : Hi José, Patch tested only on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. Also tested on darwin20. The patch is OK for me provided the updated PR94331.c test file replaces the original one. Since the PRs are about wrong code, I think the patch should be backported to at least GCC11 (applied and regtested OK). Thanks for the work, Dominique OK for the new version. Dominique
Re: [Patch, fortran V3] PR fortran/100683 - Array initialization refuses valid
Hi José, The logic is now much clearer. OK for the new version. Thanks for the work. Dominique
Re: [Patch, fortran V3] PR fortran/100683 - Array initialization refuses valid (list of pending patches)
Hi José, > Thus: Do you have a list of patches pending review? https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-April/055924.html PRs 100029 and 100040. I have the patch in my working tree for a long time. It works as expected. OK to commit. https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-April/055933.html PRs 100097 and 100098. New patch at https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-June/056169.html OK to commit the new patch. https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-June/056168.html PR 96870. https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-June/056167.html PR 96724. OK to commit. https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-June/056163.html PRs 93308, 93963, 94327, 94331, and 97046. Already OKed at https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-June/056184.html and https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-June/056193.html https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-June/056162.html PR 94104. https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-June/056155.html PR 100948. https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-June/056154.html PRs 100906, 100907, 100911, 100914, 100915, and 100916. Tis patch works for me when applied to GCC12 (not GCC11) but seems to conflict with the patch for PRs 93308, 93963, 94327, 94331, and 97046. https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-June/056152.html PR 10148. https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-June/056159.html PR 92621. https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-April/055982.html PR 100245. https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-April/055949.html PR 100136. https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-April/055946.html PR 100132. https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-April/055934.html PR 100103. https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-June/056169.html PRs 100097 and 100098. OK for me. https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-April/055921.html PRs 100024 and 100025. OK for me. Thanks for the great work, but please don't forget to mark the PRs as ASSIGNED and don't hesitate to PING after a week. Dominique
