>This question implies to me that the sender has commit access, which I
>don't think you do yet since you aren't in MAINTAINERS. But I can't
>think of a similar standard question for contributors without commit
>access; I guess just leave it out.
ack
>For git-am this line should contain scissors, e.g.
ack
>"on an empty statement", right?
fixed
>> * parser.cc (cp_parser_statement): assertion replaced with a
>
>Capitalize the beginning of the sentence, and change to active voice,
>e.g. "Replace assertion..."
fixed
>> + /* we already checked that the contract assertion is followed by
>
>Capitalize the beginning of the sentence.
fixed
>> + /* we already checked that the contract assertion is followed by
>
>Capitalize the beginning of the sentence.
fixed
>> +// check that contract assertion on a non empty statement doesn't cause an
>> ICE
>
>Capitalize the beginning of the sentence and end with a period.
fixed
>> +// { dg-do compile }
>
>This is the default; it's OK to have this line, but unnecessary.
removed
--- 8< ---
Contract assert is an attribute on an empty statement. Currently we assert
that the statement is empty before emitting the assertion. This has been
changed to a conditional check that the statement is empty before the
assertion is emitted.
PR c++/117579
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
* parser.cc (cp_parser_statement): Replace assertion with a
conditional check that the statement containing a contract assert
is empty.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* g++.dg/contracts/pr117579.C: New test.
Signed-off-by: Nina Ranns
---
gcc/cp/parser.cc | 6 --
gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/contracts/pr117579.C | 9 +
2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/contracts/pr117579.C
diff --git a/gcc/cp/parser.cc b/gcc/cp/parser.cc
index f60ed47dfd7..d8407b65a3d 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/parser.cc
+++ b/gcc/cp/parser.cc
@@ -13082,8 +13082,10 @@ cp_parser_statement (cp_parser* parser, tree
in_statement_expr,
if (cp_contract_assertion_p (std_attrs))
{
/* Add the assertion as a statement in the current block. */
- gcc_assert (!statement || statement == error_mark_node);
- emit_assertion (std_attrs);
+ if (!statement)
+ emit_assertion (std_attrs);
+ /* We already checked that the contract assertion is followed by
+ a semicolon. */
std_attrs = NULL_TREE;
}
}
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/contracts/pr117579.C
b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/contracts/pr117579.C
new file mode 100644
index 000..8878de8f23d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/contracts/pr117579.C
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
+// Check that contract assertion on a non-empty statement doesn't cause an
+// ICE.
+// { dg-options "-std=c++2a -fcontracts " }
+
+void f();
+int main ()
+{
+ [[assert: true]] f(); // { dg-error "assertions must be followed by" }
+}
--
2.47.1
