[Bug libgcj/20435] regex pattern compiling bug

2005-05-28 Thread ziga at gcc dot gnu dot org

--- Additional Comments From ziga at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-05-28 18:06 
---
Confirmed.  This regular expression makes use of possessive quantifiers (?+, *+,
++, {n,m}+), which gnu.regexp doesn't support currently.  I've written some
Mauve test cases[1] for possessive quantifiers and will be sending a patch
adding the necessary support to classpath-patches shortly.

[1] http://sources.redhat.com/ml/mauve-patches/2005/msg00049.html


-- 
   What|Removed |Added

 CC|        |ziga at gcc dot gnu dot org


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20435


[Bug libgcj/20435] regex pattern compiling bug

2005-05-28 Thread ziga at gcc dot gnu dot org

--- Additional Comments From ziga at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-05-28 20:55 
---
Proposed patch:

http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.classpath.patches/2416

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20435