[Bug target/27363] ARM gcc 4.1 optimization bug

[yfw dot debian at gmail dot com]

--- Comment #2 from yfw dot debian at gmail dot com  2006-04-30 05:09 
---
Subject: Re:  ARM gcc 4.1 optimization bug

Hi pinskia,
I tried to make a simple test example for this bug. But If I put the
code from ALSA subsystem
of Linux kernel to a test.c file, the gcc will product correct
assembly code. :(. So I put the Linux kernel assembly code(with -Os
and withoud -O) to bug reporter.


I will try the 4.1.1 later.

Thanks & Regards
yfw

On 30 Apr 2006 05:01:19 -, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> --- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-04-30 05:01 
> ---
> We really need a self contianed example but I think this was already fixed for
> 4.1.1.
>
>
> --
>
> pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
>
>What|Removed |Added
> 
>  Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
>   Component|c   |target
>
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27363
>
> --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
> You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.
>


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27363

[Bug target/27363] ARM gcc 4.1 optimization bug

[yfw dot debian at gmail dot com]

--- Comment #3 from yfw dot debian at gmail dot com  2006-04-30 05:32 
---
Where can I get gcc 4.1.1? From the ftp site, the latest gcc 4.1 release is
4.1.0.

Thanks.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27363

[Bug target/27363] ARM gcc 4.1 optimization bug

[yfw dot debian at gmail dot com]

--- Comment #4 from yfw dot debian at gmail dot com  2006-04-30 09:09 
---
I tried the gcc 4.1.1 snapshot 20060421. The bug still there. The assembly code
producted with -Os option is the same as gcc 4.1.0.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27363

[Bug target/27363] ARM gcc 4.1 optimization bug

[yfw dot debian at gmail dot com]

--- Comment #16 from yfw dot debian at gmail dot com  2006-07-22 06:21 
---
Col. pbrook.
I will try the latest gcc snapshot.

Thanks a lot.


Regards
Yin, Fengwei


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27363