[Bug c/67433] New: ?: expresion returns unexpected value when condition is a bool variable and it's value above 1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67433 Bug ID: 67433 Summary: ?: expresion returns unexpected value when condition is a bool variable and it's value above 1 Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: xuejuncao at gmail dot com Target Milestone: ---
[Bug c/67433] ?: expression returns unexpected value when condition is a bool variable which memory is not true/false
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67433 xuejuncao changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|?: expresion returns|?: expression returns |unexpected value when |unexpected value when |condition is a bool |condition is a bool |variable and it's value |variable which memory is |above 1 |not true/false --- Comment #1 from xuejuncao --- #include #include #include int main() { union u { bool b; char c; } u; memset((void *)&u, -1, sizeof(u)); bool b = (u.b ? 1 : 0); int i = (u.b ? 1 : 0); int j = (u.b ? 1 : 2); printf("b = %d, i = %d, j = %d\n", b, i, j); return 0; } without optimisation, the output is: b = 1, i = 255, j = 1 with -O2, is: b = 255, i = 255, j = 1
[Bug c/67433] ?: expression returns unexpected value when condition is a bool variable which memory is not true/false
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67433 --- Comment #3 from xuejuncao --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2) > Bool can only be 0 or 1, any other value causes undefined behavior. but it seems like a trap, the below code will not work fine, and will make program abort. (expect to write "1/0" that only takes 1 byte, but write 2 bytes when value is negative) https://github.com/google/protobuf/blob/master/src/google/protobuf/wire_format_lite_inl.h inline void WireFormatLite::WriteBoolNoTag(bool value, io::CodedOutputStream* output) { output->WriteVarint32(value ? 1 : 0); }
[Bug c/67433] ?: expression returns unexpected value when condition is a bool variable which memory is not true/false
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67433 --- Comment #4 from xuejuncao --- btw, the same code works fine on Mac: $gcc --version Configured with: --prefix=/Library/Developer/CommandLineTools/usr --with-gxx-include-dir=/usr/include/c++/4.2.1 Apple LLVM version 6.1.0 (clang-602.0.53) (based on LLVM 3.6.0svn) Target: x86_64-apple-darwin14.5.0 Thread model: posix
[Bug c/67433] ?: expression returns unexpected value when condition is a bool variable which memory is not true/false
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67433 --- Comment #8 from xuejuncao --- thanks, i get the below result with -fsanitize=undefined boolmagic.c:12:16: runtime error: load of value 255, which is not a valid value for type '_Bool' boolmagic.c:13:15: runtime error: load of value 255, which is not a valid value for type '_Bool' boolmagic.c:14:15: runtime error: load of value 255, which is not a valid value for type '_Bool' b = 1, i = 1, j = 1 but, can i say the "-fsanitize=undefined" will _corrects_ the undefined behaviour? or replace the code by if/else, which works fine (lucky?) int i; // = (u.b ? 1 : 0); if (u.b) i = 1; else i = 0;
[Bug c/67433] ?: expression returns unexpected value when condition is a bool variable which memory is not true/false
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67433 --- Comment #10 from xuejuncao --- when bool value read from unpacked stream or file, wen can not ensure it's 1 or 0; so maybe the best solution is compile with "-D_Bool=char" for now :-/
[Bug c/67433] ?: expression returns unexpected value when condition is a bool variable which memory is not true/false
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67433 --- Comment #12 from xuejuncao --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #11) > (In reply to xuejuncao from comment #10) > > when bool value read from unpacked stream or file, wen can not ensure it's 1 > > or 0; > > so maybe the best solution is compile with "-D_Bool=char" for now :-/ > > You can always do the read with 'char' and then convert to _Bool. > > You can also "fix" your testcase (I think, didn't try) by using > > union u { > bool b : 1; > char c; > } u; > > (in case unions allow bitfield members) yes, it works, but likes a trick:-) bit operation to bool is also undefined int i = (u.b & 1 ? 1 : 0); // works without -O2, useless with -O2