[Bug other/52937] [4.8 Regression] ICE in several cpu2006 benchmarks with -fprofile-use (assert in get_loop_body)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52937 --- Comment #2 from wschmidt at linux dot vnet.ibm.com 2012-04-12 11:39:37 UTC --- Sure, I'll get that information today. On Thu, 2012-04-12 at 09:28 +, rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52937 > > Richard Guenther changed: > >What|Removed |Added > >Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0 > > --- Comment #1 from Richard Guenther 2012-04-12 > 09:28:53 UTC --- > Hmpf. Can you isolate the pass that causes this with > > Index: gcc/passes.c > === > *** gcc/passes.c.orig 2012-03-16 15:13:32.0 +0100 > --- gcc/passes.c2012-03-16 15:14:17.0 +0100 > *** execute_function_todo (void *data) > *** 1732,1737 > --- 1732,1741 > verify_gimple_in_cfg (cfun); > if (flags & TODO_verify_flow) > verify_flow_info (); > + if (current_loops > + /* Between IRA and reload loops are broken but preserved. */ > + && (cfun->curr_properties & PROP_loops)) > + verify_loop_structure (); > if (current_loops && loops_state_satisfies_p (LOOP_CLOSED_SSA)) > verify_loop_closed_ssa (false); > if (flags & TODO_verify_rtl_sharing) > > ? >
[Bug target/50181] insn does not satisfy constraints for 481.wrf when generating profile data
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50181 --- Comment #3 from wschmidt at linux dot vnet.ibm.com --- Thanks, Steven! I have been on an extended vacation but will have a look at this shortly. Very likely this was fixed long ago and the bugzilla not cleaned up. Bill On Thu, 2013-12-26 at 23:35 +, steven at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50181 > > --- Comment #2 from Steven Bosscher --- > gcc 4.6 is no longer maintained. Is there still a bug here to fix? > (The testcase of comment #1 works for me with r206195 on ppc64-linux.) >
[Bug target/81996] powerpc __builtin_return_address(0) fails with -fPIC -fstack-protector-all or -fsanitize=address
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81996 --- Comment #12 from wschmidt at linux dot vnet.ibm.com --- Thanks for sorting this out, Alan! Bill > On Sep 21, 2017, at 8:30 AM, amodra at gmail dot com > wrote: > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81996 > > Alan Modra changed: > > What|Removed |Added > > Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED > Resolution|--- |FIXED > > --- Comment #11 from Alan Modra --- > Fixed all active branches > > -- > You are receiving this mail because: > You are watching someone on the CC list of the bug.
[Bug target/80982] gcc.target/powerpc/builtins-3-runnable.c fails starting with its introduction in r248846
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80982 --- Comment #3 from wschmidt at linux dot vnet.ibm.com --- Hi Carl, Just FYI, now that you've fixed the bug, and there are no plans to backport the patch, you should go ahead and set the status of the bug to RESOLVED FIXED. I know this differs from community to community, so wanted to let you know how we do it. Thanks for the quick attention to the bug report! Bill > On Jun 7, 2017, at 5:04 PM, carll at gcc dot gnu.org > wrote: > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80982 > > --- Comment #2 from Carl Love --- > Author: carll > Date: Wed Jun 7 22:03:48 2017 > New Revision: 248997 > > URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=248997&root=gcc&view=rev > Log: > gcc/ChangeLog: > > 2017-06-07 Carl Love > >PR target/80982 >* config/rs6000/altivec.md (double2): Fix the implementation of >for BE. > > Modified: >trunk/gcc/ChangeLog >trunk/gcc/config/rs6000/altivec.md > > -- > You are receiving this mail because: > You are on the CC list for the bug.
