[Bug c++/48003] New: Regression in Template Constants from 4.5.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48003 Summary: Regression in Template Constants from 4.5.2 Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org ReportedBy: swest...@gmail.com The following code compiles cleanly under g++ 4.5.2, but fails to compile under g++ 4.6.0: #include #include boost::mpl::int_ foo; It produces the errors: /usr/local/include/boost/mpl/aux_/integral_wrapper.hpp: In instantiation of ‘mpl_::int_<-0x08000>’: test_test.cpp:8:27: instantiated from here /usr/local/include/boost/mpl/aux_/integral_wrapper.hpp:73:96: error: ‘2147483647’ is not a valid template argument for type ‘int’ because it is a non-constant expression /usr/local/include/boost/mpl/aux_/integral_wrapper.hpp:73:96: error: overflow in constant expression [-fpermissive] I tested this using Boost 1.46 on a Debian AMD_64 SID system running with a 2.6.36 kernel.
[Bug c++/48281] New: internal compiler error: in record_reference, at cgraphbuild.c:60
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48281 Summary: internal compiler error: in record_reference, at cgraphbuild.c:60 Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org ReportedBy: swest...@gmail.com The code that triggered this bug is almost certainly in error, but as its caused an internal compiler error, it seemed worth reporting. That said, I don't really know *what* caused the bug, except to say that it happened when I declared my four matrix variables in the attached code (M a ... M d) to be static. The code is one unit test from an ongoing project, and I've provided the plain .cpp code (for reference) and a pre-processed file so you have a chance to reproduce the bug. In case it matters, here are my system specs: $ g++ --version g++ (Debian 4.6.0~rc1-2) 4.6.0 20110320 (prerelease) Copyright (C) 2011 Free Software Foundation, Inc. This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. $ uname -a Linux timelord 2.6.36-zen2-sti-02 #4 ZEN SMP PREEMPT Fri Jan 7 13:21:12 EST 2011 x86_64 GNU/Linux
[Bug c++/48281] internal compiler error: in record_reference, at cgraphbuild.c:60
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48281 --- Comment #1 from Stirling Westrup 2011-03-25 00:41:11 UTC --- Created attachment 23770 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23770 c++ code that was preprocessed to generated previous attachment.
[Bug c++/48281] internal compiler error: in record_reference, at cgraphbuild.c:60
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48281 --- Comment #2 from Stirling Westrup 2011-03-25 00:46:02 UTC --- It seems that the preprocessed file that generates the error is 3KB in size, and is being rejected by Bugzilla. How the heck am I supposed to submit it now?
[Bug c++/48281] internal compiler error: in record_reference, at cgraphbuild.c:60
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48281 --- Comment #4 from Stirling Westrup 2011-03-25 00:57:00 UTC --- Created attachment 23771 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23771 Minimal test case that triggers the error. Okay, I've managed to pare the original code down to the bare minimum that causes the error. This should be much easier to debug.
[Bug c++/48281] internal compiler error: in record_reference, at cgraphbuild.c:60
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48281 --- Comment #5 from Stirling Westrup 2011-03-25 00:59:04 UTC --- Created attachment 23772 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23772 Preprocessed version of minimal test case. Here's a preprocessed version of the minimal test case, just in case you have some use for it.
