[Bug c++/57480] New: struct with a va_list considered as non-POD
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57480 Bug ID: 57480 Summary: struct with a va_list considered as non-POD Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: roman at tsisyk dot com C++ frontend marks structs with va_list as non-POD. This problem is probably related to 31488. roman@work:~$ cat va_list_is_not_pod.cc #include #include struct fiber { va_list va; }; int main(int argc, char *argv[]) { static_assert(std::is_pod::value, "Should be POD"); } roman@work:~$ g++ -std=c++11 va_list_is_not_pod.cc -o test va_list_is_not_pod.cc: In function ‘int main(int, char**)’: va_list_is_not_pod.cc:11:5: error: static assertion failed: Should be POD gcc version 4.7.2 (Debian 4.7.2-5)
[Bug c++/57480] struct with a va_list considered as non-POD
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57480 --- Comment #4 from Roman Tsisyk --- I use offsetof on this structure and C++ produces a warning about POD data type. std::is_pod is not so important here. I temporary add -Wno-invalid-offsetof to my code.
[Bug c++/51347] New: [trans-mem] Segfault on templates with -O1 -fgnu-tm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51347 Bug #: 51347 Summary: [trans-mem] Segfault on templates with -O1 -fgnu-tm Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org ReportedBy: ro...@tsisyk.com Build: trunk Revision 181801 Created attachment 25946 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25946 Testcase I am doing some experiments with the transaction memory feature, which has recently been merged to the main trunk. Currently, one of my tests causes g++ segfault. --- main.cpp: In member function 'void BugContainer::bug() [with ValueType = Info]': main.cpp:35:1: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault --- It is always reproducible and tested on various configurations. I simplified code and made reduced testcase. gcc from the trunk rev 181801 date 2029. Debian gcc-snapshot 2014 has some problems. -- Configured with: ../configure --prefix=/usr/lib/gcc-snapshot --disable-bootstrap --enable-languages=c,c++ --enable-shared --enable-linker-build-id --with-system-zlib --disable-nls --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --enable-plugin --with-arch-directory=amd64 --with-arch-32=i586 --with-tune=generic --disable-werror --enable-checking=yes --build=x86_64-linux-gnu --host=x86_64-linux-gnu --target=x86_64-linux-gnu Thread model: posix gcc version 4.7.0 2029 (experimental) (GCC) --
[Bug c++/51347] [trans-mem] Segfault on templates with -O1 -fgnu-tm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51347 --- Comment #1 from Roman Tsisyk 2011-11-29 18:59:31 UTC --- Created attachment 25947 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25947 gcc output 2029
[Bug c++/51347] [trans-mem] Segfault on templates with -O1 -fgnu-tm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51347 --- Comment #3 from Roman Tsisyk 2011-12-03 10:37:02 UTC --- Works for me. Thanks for the fix.