[Bug demangler/88783] integer overflow in libiberty, heap overflow will be triggered in nm

[prajwapa at in dot ibm.com via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88783

prajwapa at in dot ibm.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||prajwapa at in dot ibm.com

--- Comment #7 from prajwapa at in dot ibm.com ---
Kindly let me know, if this bug is going to be fixed in binutils and in which
version?

[Bug demangler/88629] Regression lead to Heap-buffer-overflow problem in function d_expression_1 in cp-demangle.c, as demonstrated by c++filt

[prajwapa at in dot ibm.com via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88629

prajwapa at in dot ibm.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||prajwapa at in dot ibm.com

--- Comment #12 from prajwapa at in dot ibm.com ---
Could someone please let me know, in which binutils version is this fixed?(In
reply to Cheng Wen from comment #10)
> (In reply to Trupti Pardeshi from comment #9)
> 
> This bug can be reproduced in the commit version
> ebb8004a18a3808d7197762faf3c5aaeae82371f.
> 
> But now is fixed.

Could you please let me know, in which binutils version is this fixed?

Thanks.

[Bug demangler/88783] integer overflow in libiberty, heap overflow will be triggered in nm

[prajwapa at in dot ibm.com via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88783

--- Comment #8 from prajwapa at in dot ibm.com ---
(In reply to prajwapa from comment #7)
> Kindly let me know, if this bug is going to be fixed in binutils and in
> which version?

could someone please provide an update as this is urgent.