[Bug c++/36460] No space between >'s not always handled in C++0x

2008-08-06 Thread peterbindels at gmail dot com 


--- Comment #3 from peterbindels at gmail dot com  2008-08-06 11:44 ---
Could anybody at least confirm this bug?


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36460

[Bug c++/36460] New: No space between >'s not always handled in C++0x

2008-06-07 Thread peterbindels at gmail dot com 
template 
class A {};
template 
class B {};

A > x;


If you leave out the space between the two >'s at the definition of x, it fails
to compile. As far as I'm aware this should work in C++0x mode. The compiler
was run with -std=c++0x.

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/atlantisos/kernel$ g++ -v
Using built-in specs.
Target: i686-pc-linux-gnu
Configured with: ./configure --enable-languages=c,c++
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.3.1 (GCC)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/atlantisos/kernel$ uname -a
Linux blackbox 2.6.17.13 #12 SMP PREEMPT Fri Jun 22 23:13:07 CEST 2007 i686
Intel(R) Pentium(R) D  CPU 2.66GHz GenuineIntel GNU/Linux


-- 
   Summary: No space between >'s not always handled in C++0x
   Product: gcc
   Version: 4.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
  Severity: normal
  Priority: P3
 Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: peterbindels at gmail dot com
 GCC build triplet: i486-slackware-linux
  GCC host triplet: i486-slackware-linux
GCC target triplet: i586-pc-elf


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36460

[Bug c++/36486] g++ accepts code with ambiguous overloading

2008-06-10 Thread peterbindels at gmail dot com 


--- Comment #2 from peterbindels at gmail dot com  2008-06-10 21:32 ---
It's still warning free on 4.3.1 (except with all turned on, when ti complains
about unused parameters but nothing else).

As far as I can tell the second template matches the subset of the matches for
the first template where R would be an const ? &, with the second parameter
matching a different but still default constructed type. It's not ambiguous
because of the const at least.

I don't see why this would not work? Do you have an std reference for why this
would be ill-formed?


-- 

peterbindels at gmail dot com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC|        |peterbindels at gmail dot
   |        |com


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36486