[Bug c++/94034] [10 Regression] Broken diagnostic: 'result_decl' not supported by dump_expr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94034 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |paolo.carlini at oracle dot com --- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini --- Mine.
[Bug c++/94186] [10 Regression] compiler incorrectly accepts a requires clause with predicate of non-bool type
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94186 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||paolo.carlini at oracle dot com --- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini --- Isn't this fixable by simply tweaking satisfy_atom to unconditionally issue the error?
[Bug c++/94186] [10 Regression] compiler incorrectly accepts a requires clause with predicate of non-bool type
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94186
--- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini ---
To wit:
diff --git a/gcc/cp/constraint.cc b/gcc/cp/constraint.cc
index 697ed6726b8..59b43a31274 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/constraint.cc
+++ b/gcc/cp/constraint.cc
@@ -2543,8 +2543,7 @@ satisfy_atom (tree t, tree args, subst_info info)
return cache.save (error_mark_node);
if (!same_type_p (TREE_TYPE (result), boolean_type_node))
{
- if (info.noisy ())
- error_at (loc, "constraint does not have type %");
+ error_at (loc, "constraint does not have type %");
return cache.save (error_mark_node);
}
passes testing. Since currently we don't have an accurate location for the
constraint we could also pretty print it with %qE (ie, what we did in 9).
[Bug c++/88826] ICE (segfault) when compiling invalid C++ code with -std=c++2a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88826 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||9.1.0 Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME Target Milestone|9.4 |9.0 Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED --- Comment #6 from Paolo Carlini --- Released 9.1.0 is not affected.
[Bug c++/94034] [10 Regression] Broken diagnostic: 'result_decl' not supported by dump_expr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94034 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW Assignee|paolo.carlini at oracle dot com|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini --- Not actively. I'm unassigning myself.
[Bug c++/90448] [8/9/10 Regression] decltype-based lambda parameter pack is rejected
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90448 --- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini --- This is already fixed in trunk: I'm adding the testcase and removingg the 10 Regression marker.
[Bug c++/90320] [8/9/10 Regression] Explicit constructor called implicitly
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90320 --- Comment #5 from Paolo Carlini --- Thanks Marek.
[Bug c++/95158] [10/11 Regression] Templates + Diamond Inheritance + Final = Pure Virtual Function Call
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95158 --- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini --- That the issue goes away when templates are not involved seems an useful hint: are we trying to optimize too early? Sorry, for the time being I don't feel like assigning the bug to me, I'm in the middle of too many other things...
[Bug c++/91073] [9/10 Regression] if constexpr no longer works directly with Concepts
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91073 --- Comment #5 from Paolo Carlini --- You are right.
[Bug c++/91073] [9/10 Regression] if constexpr no longer works directly with Concepts
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91073 --- Comment #10 from Paolo Carlini --- I have been making progress on this (I'm in contact with Jason about that) but unfortunately the issue requires additional analysis for the simple reason that if I remove/amend my r260482 changes then in C++17 mode the testcases are accepted again, but in C++2a they are rejected anyway with a different error: "expected ‘auto’ or ‘decltype(auto)’ after ‘HasInit’" for the first testcase, for example. Likewise for the second testcase.
[Bug c++/91073] [9 Regression] if constexpr no longer works directly with Concepts
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91073 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|paolo at gcc dot gnu.org | Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |paolo.carlini at oracle dot com Summary|[9/10 Regression] if|[9 Regression] if constexpr |constexpr no longer works |no longer works directly |directly with Concepts |with Concepts --- Comment #12 from Paolo Carlini --- Fixed in trunk for now.
[Bug c++/92804] [10 Regression] ICE trying to use concept as a nested-name-specifier
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92804 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed||2020-01-17 Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini --- Confirmed.
[Bug c++/92542] [10 Regression] ICE with class template argument deduction following typo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92542 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||paolo.carlini at oracle dot com --- Comment #1 from Paolo Carlini --- Seems already fixed. If so I will add the testcases and resolve the bug.
[Bug c++/92542] [10 Regression] ICE with class template argument deduction following typo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92542 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|paolo.carlini at oracle dot com| Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #5 from Paolo Carlini --- Thanks Jon.
[Bug c++/92536] [10 Regression] ICE when trying to using deduction guide following unknown type error
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92536 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||paolo.carlini at oracle dot com --- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini --- Seems already fixed.
[Bug c++/92536] [10 Regression] ICE when trying to using deduction guide following unknown type error
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92536 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini --- Done.
[Bug c++/92593] [10 Regression] ICE with CTAD using undeclared constraint
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92593
--- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini ---
Another testcase:
template
struct ref_view
{
ref_view(T) { };
};
ref_view r{1};
[Bug c++/92804] [10 Regression] ICE trying to use concept as a nested-name-specifier
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92804 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |paolo.carlini at oracle dot com --- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini --- Seems doable.
[Bug c++/92804] [10 Regression] ICE trying to use concept as a nested-name-specifier
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92804 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #5 from Paolo Carlini --- Fixed.
[Bug c++/67491] [meta-bug] concepts issues
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491 Bug 67491 depends on bug 92804, which changed state. Bug 92804 Summary: [10 Regression] ICE trying to use concept as a nested-name-specifier https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92804 What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED
[Bug c++/90915] [9/10 Regression] ICE in has_attribute, at c-family/c-attribs.c:4221
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90915 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |paolo.carlini at oracle dot com --- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini --- Mine.
[Bug c++/90338] [9/10 Regression] member function pointer non-type template parameter compile fail while matching
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90338 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed||2020-01-30 Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini --- Note, this requires -std=c++2a to reproduce. Current trunk is fine, I think I'll add the testcase and remove the 10 Regression marker.
[Bug c++/89913] [8/9 Regression] ICE with invalid using declaration
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89913 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC|paolo.carlini at oracle dot com| Summary|[8/9/10 Regression] ICE |[8/9 Regression] ICE with |with invalid using |invalid using declaration |declaration | --- Comment #6 from Paolo Carlini --- Let's remove the regression marker for trunk.
[Bug c++/89404] [8/9 Regression] ICE in build_value_init_noctor, at cp/init.c:467
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89404 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[8/9/10 Regression] ICE in |[8/9 Regression] ICE in |build_value_init_noctor, at |build_value_init_noctor, at |cp/init.c:467 |cp/init.c:467 --- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini --- Already fixed in trunk.
[Bug c++/93314] [8/9/10 Regression] Invalid use of non-static data member causes ICE in gimplify_expr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93314 --- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini --- Related to c++/84939
[Bug libstdc++/56202] SIGFPE (division by zero) in std::binomial_distribution
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56202 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |paolo.carlini at oracle dot |gnu.org |com --- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini 2013-02-04 15:55:43 UTC --- Indeed, what Manuel suggested seems right to me. Let me handle this.
[Bug libstdc++/56202] SIGFPE (division by zero) in std::binomial_distribution
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56202 --- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini 2013-02-04 16:21:54 UTC --- Note: I think we want also to consider the possibility that __e is zero at the same time and in that case simply discard the iteration completely.
[Bug libstdc++/56202] SIGFPE (division by zero) in std::binomial_distribution
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56202 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0 --- Comment #6 from Paolo Carlini 2013-02-04 17:11:38 UTC --- Fixed.
[Bug libstdc++/56202] SIGFPE (division by zero) in std::binomial_distribution
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56202 --- Comment #9 from Paolo Carlini 2013-02-04 18:01:52 UTC --- You are right, but then I don't understand why we should compute __e *before* checking __t == __x, per your first patch (I think I managed to confuse myself exactly when I started wondering why...). Also __t == __x doesn't seem *so* unlikely to me to warrant a __builtin_expect (we have very few of in general, in the library). I think we could simply have: if (__t == __x) return __x; const double __e = -std::log(1.0 - __aurng()); __sum += __e / (__t - __x); __x += 1;
[Bug libstdc++/56202] SIGFPE (division by zero) in std::binomial_distribution
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56202
--- Comment #12 from Paolo Carlini 2013-02-04
19:23:38 UTC ---
Ok, thanks Manuel. Let's go with this follow up then, mainline only. If nothing
bad is reported may be suited for the branch too:
Index: include/bits/random.h
===
--- include/bits/random.h(revision 195721)
+++ include/bits/random.h(working copy)
@@ -3770,7 +3770,7 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_VERSION
* @brief A discrete binomial random number distribution.
*
* The formula for the binomial probability density function is
- * @f$p(i|t,p) = \binom{n}{i} p^i (1 - p)^{t - i}@f$ where @f$t@f$
+ * @f$p(i|t,p) = \binom{t}{i} p^i (1 - p)^{t - i}@f$ where @f$t@f$
* and @f$p@f$ are the parameters of the distribution.
*/
template
Index: include/bits/random.tcc
===
--- include/bits/random.tcc(revision 195722)
+++ include/bits/random.tcc(working copy)
@@ -1657,13 +1657,9 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_VERSION
do
{
+if (__t == __x)
+ return __x;
const double __e = -std::log(1.0 - __aurng());
-if (__t == __x)
- {
-if (__e)
- return __x;
-continue;
- }
__sum += __e / (__t - __x);
__x += 1;
}
[Bug c++/56208] [4.8 Regression] sizeof sfinae fails to work
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56208 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed||2013-02-04 Summary|sizeof sfinae fails to work |[4.8 Regression] sizeof ||sfinae fails to work Ever Confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini 2013-02-04 20:23:52 UTC --- Let's mark it as such then.
[Bug c++/56208] [4.8 Regression] Some classic sfinae cases fail to work
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56208 --- Comment #6 from Paolo Carlini 2013-02-05 09:50:11 UTC --- Thanks Daniel. Next, we have to figure out which commit broke such lookups. I can work on that today (if nobody beats me)
[Bug c++/56208] [4.8 Regression] Some classic sfinae cases fail to work
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56208 --- Comment #7 from Paolo Carlini 2013-02-05 11:25:46 UTC --- Narrowed to r190095 - r190842 so far.
[Bug c++/56215] Cannot create constexpr struct with unnamed unions
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56215 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution||DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from Paolo Carlini 2013-02-06 09:34:07 UTC --- Dup. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 54922 ***
[Bug c++/54922] [C++11][DR 1359] constexpr constructors require initialization of all union members
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54922 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||t-gcc-bugzilla at snowelm ||dot com --- Comment #10 from Paolo Carlini 2013-02-06 09:34:07 UTC --- *** Bug 56215 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
[Bug libstdc++/56216] TR1 bessel functions bomb at x == 0!
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56216 --- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini 2013-02-06 09:36:02 UTC --- Please send the patch with an appropriate ChangeLog entry to the mailing lists. Thanks.
[Bug c++/56221] Generation of zero initializer for array new without parenthesis
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56221 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution||DUPLICATE --- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini 2013-02-06 09:46:50 UTC --- This is already fixed for 4.7.3. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 56146 ***
[Bug c++/56146] Erroneous char initialization only in template function
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56146 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||neldev.online at gmail dot ||com --- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini 2013-02-06 09:46:50 UTC --- *** Bug 56221 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
[Bug libstdc++/56158] bad enum values computed by operator~ in ios_base.h
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56158 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||redi at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini 2013-02-06 09:50:50 UTC --- I'm going to regression test the fix.
[Bug c++/54122] [4.7/4.8 Regression] segfault comparing enum class in lambda inside constructor of a templated class
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54122 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ai.azuma at gmail dot com --- Comment #6 from Paolo Carlini 2013-02-06 10:10:43 UTC --- *** Bug 52613 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
[Bug c++/52619] ICE/segmentation fault in lambda function
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52619 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||DUPLICATE --- Comment #6 from Paolo Carlini 2013-02-06 10:12:00 UTC --- Fixed by the patch which fixed PR54122. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 54122 ***
[Bug c++/54122] [4.7/4.8 Regression] segfault comparing enum class in lambda inside constructor of a templated class
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54122 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||t.schuele at web dot de --- Comment #7 from Paolo Carlini 2013-02-06 10:12:00 UTC --- *** Bug 52619 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
[Bug c++/54403] [C++11] operator! applied to a member of a templated class in a lambda expression that captures 'this' pointer crashes compiler
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54403 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||DUPLICATE --- Comment #5 from Paolo Carlini 2013-02-06 10:13:41 UTC --- Fixed by the patch which fixed PR54122. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 54122 ***
[Bug c++/54122] [4.7/4.8 Regression] segfault comparing enum class in lambda inside constructor of a templated class
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54122 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ripper-tm at yandex dot ru --- Comment #8 from Paolo Carlini 2013-02-06 10:13:41 UTC --- *** Bug 54403 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
[Bug c++/52613] [C++11] ICE with noexcept in lambda expression in member function of class template
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52613 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||DUPLICATE --- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini 2013-02-06 10:10:43 UTC --- Fixed by the patch which fixed PR54122. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 54122 ***
[Bug c++/56222] Pointer to member in lambda should not require this to be captured
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56222 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||daniel.kruegler at ||googlemail dot com --- Comment #1 from Paolo Carlini 2013-02-06 11:32:40 UTC --- I don't think this is legal, when y isn't static I mean (otherwise it would be a dup of PR55828). Daniel, what do you think?
[Bug c++/56222] Pointer to member in lambda should not require this to be captured
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56222 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed||2013-02-06 Blocks||54367 Ever Confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini 2013-02-06 11:55:51 UTC --- Ok, confirmed.
[Bug libstdc++/56158] bad enum values computed by operator~ in ios_base.h
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56158 --- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini 2013-02-06 15:29:38 UTC --- I'm wondering: before doing anything in v3, is this a C++11 issue? Because in 17.5.2.1.3 I see a fixed underlying type but otherwise I see exactly ~static_cast(X) like in v3?!?
[Bug libstdc++/56158] bad enum values computed by operator~ in ios_base.h
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56158 --- Comment #6 from Paolo Carlini 2013-02-06 16:40:09 UTC --- Oh, I was missing that, thanks. Now, I don't know if we should really try to fix this now after so many years. I'm tempted to just leave it alone until we break the ABI, unless we are really sure that the value returned by the amended operator can intetoperate with old code and viceversa. Do you jnow in practice which values the current operator is returning for GCC?
[Bug libstdc++/56158] bad enum values computed by operator~ in ios_base.h
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56158 --- Comment #7 from Paolo Carlini 2013-02-07 11:22:32 UTC --- We should double check but I'm pretty sure that *in practice* *for GCC* things are Ok, because the sizeof of these enums is 4 (and in practice the systems we support have sizeof int <= 4). If we don't have a concrete testcase, we definitely want to change this later.
[Bug libstdc++/56158] bad enum values computed by operator~ in ios_base.h
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56158 --- Comment #9 from Paolo Carlini 2013-02-07 11:50:03 UTC --- Sure, sure. If we really want to support -fstrict-enums, I'm afraid we are going to open a big can of worms... Still, are you sure it causes problems *here*? I'm asking because we have the final 1L << 16.
[Bug c++/56239] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] parse error calling operator() on parenthesized value-initialized temporary
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56239 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini 2013-02-07 11:59:32 UTC --- Let's add Manuel in CC.
[Bug libstdc++/56193] ios_base should replace operator void* with explicit operator bool in C++11 onwards.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56193 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED Target Milestone|4.9.0 |4.8.0 --- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini 2013-02-07 15:13:27 UTC --- Fixed by http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2013-02/msg00222.html
[Bug c++/56247] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] internal compiler error: in tsubst_copy, at cp/pt.c:12131
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56247 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed||2013-02-07 Summary|internal compiler error: in |[4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] |tsubst_copy, at |internal compiler error: in |cp/pt.c:12131 |tsubst_copy, at ||cp/pt.c:12131 Ever Confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #1 from Paolo Carlini 2013-02-07 23:44:56 UTC --- Confirmed. 4.5.4 works for me.
[Bug libstdc++/56216] TR1 bessel functions bomb at x == 0!
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56216 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0 --- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini 2013-02-08 14:25:06 UTC --- Fixed for 4.8.0.
[Bug c++/56217] ICE: OpenMP: when combining shared() and a move constructor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56217 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|blocker |normal
[Bug c++/56251] no DW_AT_const_value for static const member of a template class
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56251 --- Comment #6 from Paolo Carlini 2013-02-08 22:50:35 UTC --- See, eg, c++/30745 and many duplicates elsewhere.
[Bug libstdc++/56267] [4.7/4.8 Regression] unordered containers require Assignable hash function
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56267 --- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini 2013-02-10 23:00:34 UTC --- Thanks Jon for fully handling this. I understand that in principle we could have checked is_nothrow_default_constructible, but it's of course much better if we can just use operations guaranteed by the Standard and be done with it. If you remember, the is_default_constructible check made me a little nervous from the start...
[Bug libstdc++/56282] [4.8 regression] std::basic_ios broken with -std=c++11 (undefined reference)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56282 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |paolo.carlini at oracle dot |gnu.org |com --- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini 2013-02-11 10:09:05 UTC --- Nahh, let's revert the whole thing.
[Bug libstdc++/56193] ios_base should replace operator void* with explicit operator bool in C++11 onwards.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56193 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED | --- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini 2013-02-11 10:32:25 UTC --- Patch reverted. Better simply do this in the next ABI.
[Bug libstdc++/56282] [4.8 regression] std::basic_ios broken with -std=c++11 (undefined reference)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56282 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #6 from Paolo Carlini 2013-02-11 10:32:55 UTC --- Fixed.
[Bug libstdc++/56193] ios_base should replace operator void* with explicit operator bool in C++11 onwards.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56193 --- Comment #6 from Paolo Carlini 2013-02-11 11:48:54 UTC --- Indeed, thanks Jon.
[Bug c++/56291] ICE for C++11 in output_constructor_regular_field, at varasm.c:4821
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56291 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC|freddie_chopin at op dot pl | --- Comment #1 from Paolo Carlini 2013-02-12 00:45:09 UTC --- Current mainline and 4_7-branch work for me. The weird thing is, stock 4.7.2 also works fine for me - I think this is essentially a duplicate of c++/54253. Are you sure you are using a stock FSF 4.7.2?
[Bug c++/56299] Dependent lambda expression breaks explicit template instantiation
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56299 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution||DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from Paolo Carlini 2013-02-12 14:41:23 UTC --- Already fixed mainline and 4.7.3. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 53137 ***
[Bug c++/53137] [4.7/4.8 Regression] g++ segfault
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53137 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ers.trion at gmail dot com --- Comment #21 from Paolo Carlini 2013-02-12 14:41:23 UTC --- *** Bug 56299 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
[Bug c++/56291] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE for C++11 in output_constructor_regular_field, at varasm.c:4821
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56291 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC|freddie_chopin at op dot pl | --- Comment #10 from Paolo Carlini 2013-02-12 15:51:07 UTC --- Because you are *already* CC-ed as submitter.
[Bug libstdc++/56111] [4.8 Regression] {float,double,long double} complex not accepted anymore
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56111 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||paolo.carlini at oracle dot ||com --- Comment #15 from Paolo Carlini 2013-02-12 16:53:42 UTC --- Marc, any news on this?
[Bug libstdc++/56111] [4.8 Regression] {float,double,long double} complex not accepted anymore
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56111 --- Comment #16 from Paolo Carlini 2013-02-12 16:59:39 UTC --- Jakub, if Marc remains unreachable I'll take care of carefully checking and committing the patch in #c9 first thing tomorrow.
[Bug c++/56303] [C++11] ICE in lambda with closure on member variable of a template class
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56303 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Known to work||4.7.3, 4.8.0 Resolution||WORKSFORME --- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini 2013-02-13 10:36:44 UTC --- I can reproduce with 4.7.2 but the problem is already fixed in mainline and 4_7-branch.
[Bug c++/56304] [C++1] ICE in get_expr_operands, at tree-ssa-operands.c for template class, using lambda with closure on member variable, also called by the constructor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56304 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Target|MinGW | Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Host|Windows 7 64 bit| Resolution||DUPLICATE Build|GCC 4.7.2 | --- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini 2013-02-13 10:38:44 UTC --- Dup. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 53037 ***
[Bug c/53037] warn_if_not_aligned(X)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53037 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||crillion at tiscali dot it --- Comment #17 from Paolo Carlini 2013-02-13 10:38:44 UTC --- *** Bug 56304 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
[Bug c++/56304] [C++1] ICE in get_expr_operands, at tree-ssa-operands.c for template class, using lambda with closure on member variable, also called by the constructor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56304 --- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini 2013-02-13 10:40:03 UTC --- Oops, fixed reference Bug. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 53137 ***
[Bug c++/53137] [4.7/4.8 Regression] g++ segfault
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53137 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||crillion at tiscali dot it --- Comment #22 from Paolo Carlini 2013-02-13 10:40:03 UTC --- *** Bug 56304 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
[Bug c++/56304] [C++1] ICE in get_expr_operands, at tree-ssa-operands.c for template class, using lambda with closure on member variable, also called by the constructor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56304 --- Comment #5 from Paolo Carlini 2013-02-13 10:44:11 UTC --- The problem is already fixed in mainline and 4_7-branch, thanks.
[Bug c++/56135] [c++11] this incorrectly captured as null in template member function
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56135 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0 --- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini 2013-02-14 23:29:27 UTC --- Fixed for 4.8.0.
[Bug c++/56013] ICE in lambda in a for-each in templated class
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56013 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED Target Milestone|--- |4.7.3 --- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini 2013-02-14 23:32:09 UTC --- Fixed mainline and 4.7.3.
[Bug c++/55680] [C++11] Member specialization with lambda is rejected
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55680 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini 2013-02-14 23:37:43 UTC --- Fixed for 4.8.0.
[Bug c++/55076] ice when compiling lambda function
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55076 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||DUPLICATE --- Comment #9 from Paolo Carlini 2013-02-14 23:42:45 UTC --- Fixed mainline and 4.7.3. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 54122 ***
[Bug c++/54122] [4.7/4.8 Regression] segfault comparing enum class in lambda inside constructor of a templated class
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54122 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tim at klingt dot org --- Comment #11 from Paolo Carlini 2013-02-14 23:42:45 UTC --- *** Bug 55076 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
[Bug c++/52026] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Constexpr Variable Appears Uninitialized in Lambda
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52026 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org Summary|[c++0x] Constexpr Variable |[4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] |Appears Uninitialized in|Constexpr Variable Appears |Lambda |Uninitialized in Lambda --- Comment #11 from Paolo Carlini 2013-02-14 23:53:43 UTC --- Seems indeed a regression.
[Bug libstdc++/56336] Buggy implementation of stoi, stol, stoll
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56336 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution||INVALID --- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini 2013-02-15 10:24:19 UTC --- I disagree that we have a bug here. The Standard says that invalid_argument is thrown if strtol, etc report that no conversion could be performed. Here a conversion can be performed, for the first 4 chars. Note that in general in this context - the strto* functions which are being wrapped - it's normal that only the first part of the passed string represents a valid number, there is nothing strange about this, and *idx, the second argument to the sto* functions, which you are not using, is correctly updated to point to 'x', as the Standard requests.
[Bug c++/56323] [C++11] cannot compile inherited constructor for typedef'ed base class
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56323 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0 --- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini 2013-02-15 11:17:07 UTC --- Fixed.
[Bug c++/55220] [c++11] ICE when doing partial template specialization on variadic template
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55220 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0 --- Comment #6 from Paolo Carlini 2013-02-15 11:18:07 UTC --- Fixed.
[Bug c++/55223] [C++11] Default lambda expression of a templated class member
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55223 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0 --- Comment #6 from Paolo Carlini 2013-02-15 11:19:09 UTC --- Fixed.
[Bug c++/55232] [C++11] ICE with -Wunused-parameter for unused parameter pack using qualified dependent name
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55232 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0 --- Comment #11 from Paolo Carlini 2013-02-15 11:20:09 UTC --- Fixed.
[Bug c++/54922] [C++11][DR 1359] constexpr constructors require initialization of all union members
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54922 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #12 from Paolo Carlini 2013-02-15 11:23:21 UTC --- Fixed.
[Bug c++/55003] [C++11] Member function pointer not working as constexpr initializer
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55003 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0 --- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini 2013-02-15 11:24:22 UTC --- Fixed.
[Bug c++/51833] ICE in tsubst_copy, at cp/pt.c:11333
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51833 --- Comment #8 from Paolo Carlini 2013-02-15 11:32:02 UTC --- This is fixed in mainline. I'm adding the reduced testcase and closing the issue.
[Bug c++/55223] [C++11] Default lambda expression of a templated class member
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55223 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||naddiseo at gmail dot com --- Comment #7 from Paolo Carlini 2013-02-15 11:47:06 UTC --- *** Bug 51833 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
[Bug c++/51833] ICE in tsubst_copy, at cp/pt.c:11333
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51833 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||DUPLICATE --- Comment #9 from Paolo Carlini 2013-02-15 11:47:06 UTC --- It's in fact a Dup. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 55223 ***
[Bug c++/53486] ICE compiling code using lambdas as default argument
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53486 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||DUPLICATE --- Comment #8 from Paolo Carlini 2013-02-15 12:05:03 UTC --- Dup. Testcase doesn't ICE anymore. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 55223 ***
[Bug c++/55223] [C++11] Default lambda expression of a templated class member
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55223 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jpalecek at web dot de --- Comment #8 from Paolo Carlini 2013-02-15 12:05:03 UTC --- *** Bug 53486 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
[Bug c++/56340] Wrong error from exception specifications of defaulted destructors
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56340 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini 2013-02-15 13:21:29 UTC --- Closing.
[Bug c++/54276] Lambda in a Template Function Undefined Reference to local static
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54276 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini 2013-02-15 15:17:24 UTC --- Just noticed that *the workaround* doesn't work anymore in 4.8/4.7, not sure if this implies something interesting...
[Bug testsuite/56345] FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/lambda/lambda-this8.C -std=c++11 (test for excess errors)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56345 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed||2013-02-15 CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org Ever Confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #1 from Paolo Carlini 2013-02-15 15:24:39 UTC --- Confirmed. See also: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-02/msg00701.html
[Bug testsuite/56345] FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/lambda/lambda-this8.C -std=c++11 (test for excess errors)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56345 --- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini 2013-02-15 15:30:31 UTC --- This is a lot puzzling by the way. I have on idea what the specific issue being tested may have to do with the error: compiling in C++11 mode a file only including or even only works for you? And then why nothing showed up already in the v3 testsuite?!?
[Bug testsuite/56345] FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/lambda/lambda-this8.C -std=c++11 (test for excess errors)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56345 --- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini 2013-02-15 15:40:33 UTC --- Ah, ah, I was staring at the file *already* using __builtin_abort and was *really* puzzled.
[Bug testsuite/56345] FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/lambda/lambda-this8.C -std=c++11 (test for excess errors)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56345 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #5 from Paolo Carlini 2013-02-15 16:29:55 UTC --- Let's close this.
[Bug c++/56135] [c++11] this incorrectly captured as null in template member function
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56135 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.8.0 |4.7.3 --- Comment #5 from Paolo Carlini 2013-02-15 18:35:34 UTC --- ... and 4.7.3.
[Bug c++/55710] [C++11] Linkage errors with lambdas
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55710 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED Target Milestone|--- |4.7.3 --- Comment #12 from Paolo Carlini 2013-02-15 18:38:00 UTC --- Thanks Jason! Fixed mainline and 4.7.3.
