[Bug tree-optimization/114253] New: False positive maybe-uninitialized with std::optional and ternary

2024-03-06 Thread overdijk at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114253

Bug ID: 114253
   Summary: False positive maybe-uninitialized with std::optional
and ternary
   Product: gcc
   Version: 8.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
  Severity: normal
  Priority: P3
 Component: tree-optimization
  Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
  Reporter: overdijk at gmail dot com
  Target Milestone: ---

The following warning is reported:
> mwe.cpp: In function ‘int main()’:
> mwe.cpp:26:13: warning: ‘pid’ may be used uninitialized in this function 
> [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
>  kill_pid(*pid);
>  ^~

When compiling this minimum working example:

#include  
#include  

std::optional get_pid()
{
  return std::nullopt;
}

void kill_pid(int)
{
}

int main()
{
  std::string s;

  volatile bool is_running = true;
  std::optional pid = is_running ? get_pid() : std::nullopt;

  kill_pid(0);

  if (pid)
kill_pid(*pid); // no warning

  if (pid)
kill_pid(*pid); // warning: 'pid' may be used uninitialized in this
function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
}


With the following compiler command line:
$ g++ -std=c++17 -O1 -fPIC -Wmaybe-uninitialized mwe.cpp

I think it is a false positive, since *pid is only used after verifying that it
is valid.

If any of these changes are made, the warning is no longer reported:
* Replace std::optional by a plain int*
* Remove the std::string variable (or replace it by something simple such as
int)
* Remove the first or second call to kill_pid
* Changing the ternary (e.g. `is_running ? std::optional{999} :
std::nullopt`)
* Removing -O1 or -fPIC from the command line (a higher optimization level is
fine)

I observed it with gcc 8.3.0, but it can be reproduced with gcc 8.1 through
13.2 as can be seen on godbolt:
https://godbolt.org/z/TYqYdfc77

[Bug tree-optimization/114253] False positive maybe-uninitialized with std::optional and ternary

2024-03-06 Thread overdijk at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114253

--- Comment #1 from Frank Overdijk  ---
Created attachment 57629
  --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57629&action=edit
Preprocessed minimum working example

[Bug tree-optimization/114253] False positive maybe-uninitialized with std::optional and ternary

2024-03-06 Thread overdijk at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114253

--- Comment #2 from Frank Overdijk  ---
Created attachment 57630
  --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57630&action=edit
Verbose compiler output