[Bug web/57114] New: wrong information at http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gfortran/RANK.html

2013-04-29 Thread kay.diederi...@uni-konstanz.de


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57114



 Bug #: 57114

   Summary: wrong information at

http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gfortran/RANK.html

Classification: Unclassified

   Product: gcc

   Version: unknown

Status: UNCONFIRMED

  Severity: normal

  Priority: P3

 Component: web

AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org

ReportedBy: kay.diederi...@uni-konstanz.de





There are are at least two things wrong at in the documentation of gfortran's

RANK intrinsic at http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gfortran/RANK.html :



First,

RESULT = RANGE(A) 

should read

RESULT = RANK(A)



and second, the example should have

print *, rank(a), rank(b) ! Prints:  0  2

instead of

print *, rank(a), rank(b) ! Prints:  0  3


[Bug fortran/89632] New: documentation bug

2019-03-08 Thread kay.diederi...@uni-konstanz.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89632

Bug ID: 89632
   Summary: documentation bug
   Product: gcc
   Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
  Severity: normal
  Priority: P3
 Component: fortran
  Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
  Reporter: kay.diederi...@uni-konstanz.de
  Target Milestone: ---

At https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gfortran/Code-Gen-Options.html in the section
-fno-underscoring, it says 
"is implemented as something akin to:
i = j_() + max_count__(&my_var__, &lvar);"
but the last line should surely be
i = j_() + max_count__(&my_var_, &lvar_);