[Bug fortran/92621] Problems with memory handling with allocatable intent(out) arrays with bind(c)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92621 --- Comment #14 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- On 28/04/21 18:49, anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > Did you log in with your @gcc.gnu.org account? > Yes, changing the login email seems to have done the trick. Thank you very much for your help! Best regards, José Rui
[Bug fortran/94331] Bind(C) corrupts array descriptors
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94331 --- Comment #5 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Hi Sandra! I have a patch for this problem, which also seems to work for PR93308, I expect to post it in the next week, if all goes well. Best regards, José Rui
[Bug fortran/93308] bind(c) subroutine changes lower bound of array argument in caller
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93308 José Rui Faustino de Sousa changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jrfsousa at gcc dot gnu.org CC||jrfsousa at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Hi Sandra! Hi I have a patch for this, which also seems to work for PR93 I expect to post it in the next week, if all goes well. Best regards, José Rui
[Bug fortran/100683] New: Array initialization refuses valid
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100683 Bug ID: 100683 Summary: Array initialization refuses valid Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: jrfsousa at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 50846 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50846&action=edit Fortran code showing problem Hi All! Refuses valid array initialization with bogus error. Seen on: GNU Fortran (GCC) 9.3.1 20210514 GNU Fortran (GCC) 10.3.1 20210514 GNU Fortran (GCC) 11.1.1 20210514 GNU Fortran (GCC) 12.0.0 20210514 (experimental) Thank you very much. Best regards, José Rui
[Bug fortran/100683] Array initialization refuses valid
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100683 --- Comment #1 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Patch posted: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-May/056053.html
[Bug fortran/93308] bind(c) subroutine changes lower bound of array argument in caller
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93308 --- Comment #4 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Patch posted: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-May/056054.html
[Bug fortran/93963] Select rank mishandling allocatable and pointer arguments with bind(c)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93963 --- Comment #4 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Patch posted: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-May/056054.html
[Bug fortran/94327] Bind(c) argument attributes are incorrectly set
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94327 --- Comment #3 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Patch posted: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-May/056054.html
[Bug fortran/94331] Bind(C) corrupts array descriptors
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94331 --- Comment #6 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Patch posted: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-May/056054.html
[Bug fortran/97046] Bad interaction between lbound/ubound, allocatable arrays and bind(C) subroutine with dimension(..) parameter
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97046 José Rui Faustino de Sousa changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jrfsousa at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #6 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Patch posted: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-May/056054.html
[Bug fortran/100816] New: Wrong span on widechar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100816 Bug ID: 100816 Summary: Wrong span on widechar Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: jrfsousa at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 50884 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50884&action=edit Fortran code showing problem Hi all! Array descriptor span does not reflect larger number of bytes on widechar. Seen on: GNU Fortran (GCC) 9.3.1 20210526 GNU Fortran (GCC) 10.3.1 20210526 GNU Fortran (GCC) 11.1.1 20210526 GNU Fortran (GCC) 12.0.0 20210527 (experimental) Thank you very much. Best regards, José Rui
[Bug fortran/100818] New: A temporary is passed to associated
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100818 Bug ID: 100818 Summary: A temporary is passed to associated Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: jrfsousa at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 50885 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50885&action=edit Fortran code showing problem Hi All! The code generates a temporary to pass to associated... Seen on: GNU Fortran (GCC) 9.3.1 20210526 GNU Fortran (GCC) 10.3.1 20210526 GNU Fortran (GCC) 11.1.1 20210526 GNU Fortran (GCC) 12.0.0 20210527 (experimental) Thank you very much. Best regards, José Rui
[Bug fortran/100120] associated intrinsic failure
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100120 --- Comment #3 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Please ignore anterior patch as it contains really bad errors a corrected one will follow shortly.
[Bug fortran/100819] New: Wrong code generation with unlimited polymorphic objects and character type
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100819 Bug ID: 100819 Summary: Wrong code generation with unlimited polymorphic objects and character type Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: jrfsousa at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 50886 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50886&action=edit Fortran code showing problem Hi All! Mostly improperly set "_len", "elem_len" or "span". Seen on: GNU Fortran (GCC) 11.1.1 20210526 GNU Fortran (GCC) 12.0.0 20210527 (experimental) ICEs on: GNU Fortran (GCC) 9.3.1 20210526 GNU Fortran (GCC) 10.3.1 20210526 Thank you very much. Best regards, José Rui
[Bug fortran/100821] New: Deferred character with wrong bounds
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100821 Bug ID: 100821 Summary: Deferred character with wrong bounds Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: jrfsousa at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 50887 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50887&action=edit Fortran code showing problem Hi All! Due to the way deferred character length is implemented, using SAVE_EXPR, it will usually contain garbage. Seen on: GNU Fortran (GCC) 9.3.1 20210526 GNU Fortran (GCC) 10.3.1 20210526 GNU Fortran (GCC) 11.1.1 20210526 GNU Fortran (GCC) 12.0.0 20210527 (experimental) Thank you very much. Best regards, José Rui
[Bug fortran/100821] Deferred character with wrong length
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100821 --- Comment #1 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Patch posted: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-May/056097.html
[Bug fortran/100819] Wrong code generation with unlimited polymorphic objects and character type
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100819 --- Comment #1 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Patch posted: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-May/056097.html
[Bug fortran/100818] A temporary is passed to associated
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100818 --- Comment #1 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Patch posted: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-May/056097.html
[Bug fortran/100816] Wrong span on widechar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100816 --- Comment #1 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Patch posted: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-May/056097.html
[Bug fortran/100120] associated intrinsic failure
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100120 --- Comment #4 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Patch posted (hopefully correct this time): https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-May/056097.html
[Bug fortran/94331] Bind(C) corrupts array descriptors
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94331 --- Comment #9 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Created attachment 50890 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50890&action=edit Updated PR94331.c test file
[Bug fortran/94331] Bind(C) corrupts array descriptors
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94331 --- Comment #10 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Hi Dominique, Thank you vary much for taking the time to test the patch. If I understand you correctly the problem is on the test not on the patch itself, right? I have fixed the glaring mistake in PR94331.c, could you be so gentle as to test it to verify that it does indeed solve the problems you found? Thank you very much. Best regards, José Rui
[Bug fortran/100906] New: Bind(c): failure handling character with len/=1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100906 Bug ID: 100906 Summary: Bind(c): failure handling character with len/=1 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: jrfsousa at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 50929 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50929&action=edit Fortran code showing problem Hi All! Failures (mostly mixing kind with len) on handling character with length greater than 1. Seen on: GNU Fortran (GCC) 10.3.1 20210526 (ICE) GNU Fortran (GCC) 11.1.1 20210526 GNU Fortran (GCC) 12.0.0 20210529 (experimental) Thank you very much. Best regards, José Rui
[Bug fortran/100906] Bind(c): failure handling character with len/=1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100906 --- Comment #1 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Created attachment 50930 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50930&action=edit C code for bind(c)
[Bug fortran/100907] New: Bind(c): failure handling wide character
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100907 Bug ID: 100907 Summary: Bind(c): failure handling wide character Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: jrfsousa at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 50931 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50931&action=edit Fortran code showing problem Hi All! Fails in too many different ways... Should work at least as CFI_type_other... Seen on: GNU Fortran (GCC) 10.3.1 20210526 (ICE) GNU Fortran (GCC) 11.1.1 20210526 GNU Fortran (GCC) 12.0.0 20210529 (experimental) Thank you very much. Best regards, José Rui
[Bug fortran/100907] Bind(c): failure handling wide character
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100907 --- Comment #1 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Created attachment 50932 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50932&action=edit C code for bind(c)
[Bug fortran/100910] New: Bind(c): errors handling long double complex
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100910 Bug ID: 100910 Summary: Bind(c): errors handling long double complex Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: jrfsousa at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 50935 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50935&action=edit Fortran code showing problem Hi All! Errors handling kind due to kind not being realted to elem_len. Seen on: GNU Fortran (GCC) 10.3.1 20210526 GNU Fortran (GCC) 11.1.1 20210526 GNU Fortran (GCC) 12.0.0 20210529 (experimental) Thank you very much. Best regards. José Rui
[Bug fortran/100910] Bind(c): errors handling long double complex
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100910 --- Comment #1 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Created attachment 50936 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50936&action=edit C code for bind(c)
[Bug fortran/100911] New: Bind(c): failure handling C_PTR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100911 Bug ID: 100911 Summary: Bind(c): failure handling C_PTR Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: jrfsousa at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 50937 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50937&action=edit Fortran code showing problem Hi All! Wrong type and kind and crash due to division by zero (elem_len==0) Seen on: GNU Fortran (GCC) 10.3.1 20210526 GNU Fortran (GCC) 11.1.1 20210526 GNU Fortran (GCC) 12.0.0 20210529 (experimental) Thank you very much. Best regards, José Rui
[Bug fortran/100911] Bind(c): failure handling C_PTR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100911 --- Comment #1 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Created attachment 50938 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50938&action=edit C code for bind(c)
[Bug fortran/100914] New: Bind(c): errors handling complex
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100914 Bug ID: 100914 Summary: Bind(c): errors handling complex Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: jrfsousa at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 50939 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50939&action=edit Fortran code showing problem Hi All! Wrong type and kind with complex intrinsic type, causing failure at CFI_Address. Seen on: GNU Fortran (GCC) 10.3.1 20210526 GNU Fortran (GCC) 11.1.1 20210526 GNU Fortran (GCC) 12.0.0 20210529 (experimental) Thank you very much. Best regards, José Rui
[Bug fortran/100914] Bind(c): errors handling complex
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100914 --- Comment #1 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Created attachment 50940 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50940&action=edit C code for bind(c)
[Bug fortran/100915] New: Bind(c): failure handling C_FUNPTR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100915 Bug ID: 100915 Summary: Bind(c): failure handling C_FUNPTR Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: jrfsousa at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 50941 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50941&action=edit Fortran code showing problem Hi All! Wrong type, kind and elem_len confuses CFI_address. Seen on: GNU Fortran (GCC) 10.3.1 20210526 GNU Fortran (GCC) 11.1.1 20210526 GNU Fortran (GCC) 12.0.0 20210529 (experimental) Thank you very much. Best regards, José Rui
[Bug fortran/100915] Bind(c): failure handling C_FUNPTR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100915 --- Comment #1 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Created attachment 50942 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50942&action=edit C code for bind(c)
[Bug fortran/100916] New: Bind(c): CFI_type_other unimplemented.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100916 Bug ID: 100916 Summary: Bind(c): CFI_type_other unimplemented. Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: jrfsousa at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 50943 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50943&action=edit Fortran code showing problem Hi All! As per standard non C interoperability types get CFI_type_other. Seen on: GNU Fortran (GCC) 10.3.1 20210526 GNU Fortran (GCC) 11.1.1 20210526 GNU Fortran (GCC) 12.0.0 20210529 (experimental) Thank you very much. Best regards, José Rui
[Bug fortran/100916] Bind(c): CFI_type_other unimplemented.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100916 --- Comment #1 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Created attachment 50944 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50944&action=edit C code for bind(c)
[Bug fortran/100917] New: Bind(c): errors handling long double real
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100917 Bug ID: 100917 Summary: Bind(c): errors handling long double real Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: jrfsousa at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 50945 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50945&action=edit Fortran code showing problem Hi All! Wrong type and kind on handling long double real. Since kind is not related to elem_len there seems to be no way to infer it. Seen on: GNU Fortran (GCC) 10.3.1 20210526 GNU Fortran (GCC) 11.1.1 20210526 GNU Fortran (GCC) 12.0.0 20210529 (experimental) Thank you very much. Best regards, José Rui
[Bug fortran/100917] Bind(c): errors handling long double real
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100917 --- Comment #1 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Created attachment 50946 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50946&action=edit C code for bind(c)
[Bug fortran/100907] Bind(c): failure handling wide character
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100907 --- Comment #3 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- It seems that Mac OS doesn't have the full set of C11 standard headers... :-( It should work using "stdint.h" and typedef(ing) char32_t to uint32_t. If that doesn't work either one could try "unsigned int". I will attach an updated file, with the altered file. I have no access to Mac OS, so I cannot test it. Thank you very much. Best regards, José Rui
[Bug fortran/100907] Bind(c): failure handling wide character
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100907 --- Comment #4 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Created attachment 50954 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50954&action=edit Mac OS support
[Bug fortran/100910] Bind(c): errors handling long double complex
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100910 --- Comment #3 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- AFAIK the "CMPLX" macros are part of C11 and should be defined in the standard header "complex.h"... Since there are no complains about the header, maybe just adding the definition of the macro will do the trick... #define CMPLXL(x, y) ((long double complex)((long double)(x) + I * (long double)(y))) I will attach an altered file. Thank you very much. Best regards, José Rui
[Bug fortran/100910] Bind(c): errors handling long double complex
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100910 --- Comment #4 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Created attachment 50955 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50955&action=edit Missing macros
[Bug fortran/100914] Bind(c): errors handling complex
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100914 --- Comment #3 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- This is the same problem as in PR100910. I will attach an updated file. Thank you very much. Best regards, José Rui
[Bug fortran/100914] Bind(c): errors handling complex
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100914 --- Comment #4 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Created attachment 50956 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50956&action=edit Missing macros
[Bug fortran/100907] Bind(c): failure handling wide character
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100907 --- Comment #6 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- > Shouldn't the C11 standard headers be provide by GCC12? > AFAIK gcc uses the system's libc. In Linux the default will be GNU libc "glibc" in Mas OS the default libc will be BSD libc which is missing some of the headers... Or so it says in GNU portability library "gnulib" documentation... Thank you very much. Best regards, José Rui
[Bug fortran/100948] [12 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_expr_val, at fortran/trans-expr.c:9069
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100948 --- Comment #4 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- I am looking into this. I think I already have a patch for the ICE, but there are further problems which I am trying to solve. Best regards, José Rui
[Bug fortran/100683] Array initialization refuses valid
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100683 --- Comment #5 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- I am having trouble reproducing this. Can you provide some more detail on your setup? Best regards, José Rui
[Bug fortran/101047] New: Pointer explicit initialization fails
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101047 Bug ID: 101047 Summary: Pointer explicit initialization fails Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: jrfsousa at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 50991 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50991&action=edit Fortran code showing problem Hi all! Pointer explicit initialization does not seem to work at all. Seen on: GNU Fortran (GCC) 9.4.1 20210605 GNU Fortran (GCC) 10.3.1 20210605 GNU Fortran (GCC) 11.1.1 20210605 GNU Fortran (GCC) 12.0.0 20210612 (experimental) Thank you very much. Best regards, José Rui
[Bug fortran/101048] New: Class pointer explicit initialization refuses valid
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101048 Bug ID: 101048 Summary: Class pointer explicit initialization refuses valid Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: jrfsousa at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 50992 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50992&action=edit Fortran code showing problem Hi All! Class pointer explicit initialization refused with bogus error. Seen on: GNU Fortran (GCC) 9.4.1 20210605 GNU Fortran (GCC) 10.3.1 20210605 GNU Fortran (GCC) 11.1.1 20210605 GNU Fortran (GCC) 12.0.0 20210612 (experimental) Thank you very much. Best regards, José Rui
[Bug fortran/101048] Class pointer explicit initialization refuses valid
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101048 --- Comment #1 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Created attachment 50993 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50993&action=edit Patch and changelog
[Bug fortran/101048] Class pointer explicit initialization refuses valid
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101048 --- Comment #2 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Patch posted: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-June/056152.html
[Bug fortran/101047] Pointer explicit initialization fails
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101047 --- Comment #1 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Patch posted: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-June/056152.html
[Bug fortran/101047] Pointer explicit initialization fails
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101047 --- Comment #2 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Created attachment 50994 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50994&action=edit Patch and changelog
[Bug fortran/100917] Bind(c): errors handling long double real
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100917 --- Comment #2 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Patch posted: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-June/056154.html
[Bug fortran/100917] Bind(c): errors handling long double real
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100917 --- Comment #3 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Please ignore patch wrong PR... Sorry for the inconvenience. Best regards, José Rui
[Bug fortran/100916] Bind(c): CFI_type_other unimplemented.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100916 --- Comment #2 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Patch posted: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-June/056154.html
[Bug fortran/100916] Bind(c): CFI_type_other unimplemented.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100916 --- Comment #3 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Created attachment 50996 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50996&action=edit Patch and changelog
[Bug fortran/100915] Bind(c): failure handling C_FUNPTR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100915 --- Comment #2 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Patch posted: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-June/056154.html
[Bug fortran/100915] Bind(c): failure handling C_FUNPTR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100915 --- Comment #3 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Created attachment 50997 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50997&action=edit Patch and changelog
[Bug fortran/100914] Bind(c): errors handling complex
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100914 --- Comment #5 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Patch posted: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-June/056154.html
[Bug fortran/100914] Bind(c): errors handling complex
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100914 --- Comment #6 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Created attachment 50998 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50998&action=edit Patch and changelog
[Bug fortran/100911] Bind(c): failure handling C_PTR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100911 --- Comment #2 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Patch posted: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-June/056154.html
[Bug fortran/100911] Bind(c): failure handling C_PTR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100911 --- Comment #3 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Created attachment 50999 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50999&action=edit Patch and changelog
[Bug fortran/100907] Bind(c): failure handling wide character
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100907 --- Comment #7 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Created attachment 51000 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51000&action=edit Patch and changelog
[Bug fortran/100906] Bind(c): failure handling character with len/=1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100906 --- Comment #2 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Patch posted: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-June/056154.html
[Bug fortran/100906] Bind(c): failure handling character with len/=1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100906 --- Comment #3 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Created attachment 51001 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51001&action=edit Patch and changelog
[Bug fortran/100948] [12 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_expr_val, at fortran/trans-expr.c:9069
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100948 --- Comment #5 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Partial patch posted: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-June/056155.html
[Bug fortran/100948] [12 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_expr_val, at fortran/trans-expr.c:9069
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100948 --- Comment #6 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Created attachment 51002 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51002&action=edit Patch and changelog
[Bug fortran/100683] Array initialization refuses valid
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100683
--- Comment #7 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa ---
I was using pr87993.f90 from the testsuite... ;-)
The fix is simple enough:
diff --git a/gcc/fortran/resolve.c b/gcc/fortran/resolve.c
index a37ad66..a9518e7 100644
--- a/gcc/fortran/resolve.c
+++ b/gcc/fortran/resolve.c
@@ -7138,8 +7138,10 @@ gfc_resolve_expr (gfc_expr *e)
/* Also try to expand a constructor. */
if (t)
{
+ gfc_simplify_expr(e, 1);
gfc_expression_rank (e);
- if (gfc_is_constant_expr (e) || gfc_is_expandable_expr (e))
+ if (e->expr_type == EXPR_ARRAY
+ && (gfc_is_constant_expr (e) || gfc_is_expandable_expr (e)))
gfc_expand_constructor (e, false);
}
I really should have though of this possibility...
Thank you very much.
Best regards,
José Rui
[Bug fortran/100683] Array initialization refuses valid
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100683 --- Comment #8 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Corrected patch posted: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-June/056160.html
[Bug fortran/100683] Array initialization refuses valid
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100683 --- Comment #9 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Created attachment 51010 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51010&action=edit Patch and changelog
[Bug fortran/94104] Request for diagnostic improvement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94104 --- Comment #2 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Patch posted: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-June/056162.html
[Bug fortran/94104] Request for diagnostic improvement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94104 --- Comment #3 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Created attachment 51013 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51013&action=edit Error message improvement
[Bug fortran/94104] Request for diagnostic improvement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94104 José Rui Faustino de Sousa changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
[Bug fortran/94331] Bind(C) corrupts array descriptors
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94331 --- Comment #12 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Updated patch posted: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-June/056163.html
[Bug fortran/93308] bind(c) subroutine changes lower bound of array argument in caller
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93308 --- Comment #6 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Updated patch: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-June/056163.html
[Bug fortran/93308] bind(c) subroutine changes lower bound of array argument in caller
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93308 --- Comment #7 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Created attachment 51014 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51014&action=edit Updated patch.
[Bug fortran/93963] Select rank mishandling allocatable and pointer arguments with bind(c)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93963 --- Comment #6 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Updated patch: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-June/056163.html
[Bug fortran/93963] Select rank mishandling allocatable and pointer arguments with bind(c)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93963 --- Comment #7 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Created attachment 51015 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51015&action=edit Updated patch.
[Bug fortran/94327] Bind(c) argument attributes are incorrectly set
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94327 --- Comment #5 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Updated patch: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-June/056163.html
[Bug fortran/94327] Bind(c) argument attributes are incorrectly set
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94327 --- Comment #6 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Created attachment 51016 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51016&action=edit Updated patch.
[Bug fortran/94331] Bind(C) corrupts array descriptors
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94331 --- Comment #13 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Created attachment 51017 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51017&action=edit Updated patch.
[Bug fortran/97046] Bad interaction between lbound/ubound, allocatable arrays and bind(C) subroutine with dimension(..) parameter
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97046 --- Comment #8 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Updated patch: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-June/056163.html
[Bug fortran/97046] Bad interaction between lbound/ubound, allocatable arrays and bind(C) subroutine with dimension(..) parameter
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97046 --- Comment #9 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Created attachment 51018 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51018&action=edit Updated patch.
[Bug fortran/82376] Duplicate function call using -fcheck=pointer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82376 José Rui Faustino de Sousa changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #3 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Fixed on mainline for gcc-12, 11-branch and 10-branch. Best regards, José Rui
[Bug fortran/94048] ICE and other problems using rank intrinsic to set array size
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94048 José Rui Faustino de Sousa changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #4 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Fixed by PR96726
[Bug fortran/100683] Array initialization refuses valid
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100683 --- Comment #10 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Second and hopefully last update... https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-June/056170.html
[Bug fortran/100683] Array initialization refuses valid
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100683 José Rui Faustino de Sousa changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #51010|0 |1 is obsolete|| --- Comment #11 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Created attachment 51032 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51032&action=edit Updated patch.
[Bug fortran/100245] ICE on automatic reallocation
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100245 --- Comment #4 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- On 01/09/22 19:30, anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100245 > Hi Anlauf, Sorry for the very late answer, but at the moment I am far too busy to even look into it. Do as you see fit, it is fine by me. Best regards, José Rui > anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: > > What|Removed |Added > > CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org > > --- Comment #3 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- > Jose, your patch looks fine, but unfortunately was never reviewed. > Do you plan to ping it, or shall I take care of it? >
