[Bug c++/67632] New: explicit instantiation omits copy constructor and others

2015-09-18 Thread jlink at drw dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67632

Bug ID: 67632
   Summary: explicit instantiation omits copy constructor and
others
   Product: gcc
   Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
  Severity: normal
  Priority: P3
 Component: c++
  Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
  Reporter: jlink at drw dot com
  Target Milestone: ---

When I compile the follow test case with g++ -std=c++11 -c, and view the output
with nm, it shows that the std::unordered_map copy constructor is never
emitted:

% cat t.cc 
#include 
template class std::unordered_map;
% g++ -std=c++11 -c t.cc
% 

If I compile the following and link it with the above, I'll get the undefined
reference:

% cat x.cc 
#include 
extern template class std::unordered_map;
std::unordered_map copy(
   const std::unordered_map & a) { return a; }

main() {}

% g++ -std=c++11 t.o x.cc 
/tmp/cc0dF94P.o: In function `copy(std::unordered_map,
std::equal_to, std::allocator > > const&)':
x.cc:(.text+0x1f): undefined reference to `std::unordered_map, std::equal_to, std::allocator >
>::unordered_map(std::unordered_map,
std::equal_to, std::allocator > > const&)'
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status

This seems like a clear bug, right?  Either the explicit instantiation should
emit everything, or the use of extern template should know what still needs to
be emitted locally.


[Bug c++/67632] explicit instantiation omits copy constructor and others

2015-09-18 Thread jlink at drw dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67632

--- Comment #3 from Joseph Link  ---
Yeah, watch out for the copy constructor that takes an allocator.  That one's
there.  The compiler generated one is not.