[Bug c++/97839] New: Template lambda incorrectly requiring the optional lambda-declarator
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97839 Bug ID: 97839 Summary: Template lambda incorrectly requiring the optional lambda-declarator Product: gcc Version: 10.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: gar...@ignition-web.co.uk Target Milestone: --- int main() { []{}.operator()(); } https://godbolt.org/z/eo4ebr http://eel.is/c++draft/expr.prim.lambda.general#nt:lambda-expression
[Bug middle-end/67809] Empty pointer-chasing loops aren't optimized out
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67809 Gareth Lloyd changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gar...@ignition-web.co.uk --- Comment #11 from Gareth Lloyd --- Looks like as of GCC 10.1 this optimisation exists This bug can be closed?
[Bug c++/101509] New: Rejects valid construction call with type inference
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101509 Bug ID: 101509 Summary: Rejects valid construction call with type inference Product: gcc Version: 11.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: gar...@ignition-web.co.uk Target Milestone: --- template struct S { S(T); }; struct my_type{ my_type(S); }; void foo(S); void test() { my_type(S(1)); // no issue here my_type(S{1}); // no issue here auto tmp1 = my_type(S(1)); // no issue here auto tmp2 = my_type(S{1}); // no issue here foo(S(1)); // no issue here foo(S{1}); // no issue here my_type tmp3(S(1)); // no issue here my_type tmp4(S{1}); // GCC error my_type tmp5((S{1})); // no issue here } https://godbolt.org/z/jb68o46fP
[Bug c++/101509] Rejects valid construction call with type inference
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101509 --- Comment #1 from Gareth Lloyd --- This was originally discovered where `S` was `std::vector` and was constructed with an initializer_list