[Bug c/32953] New: -Wformat warns incorrectly on an unterminated format string of length 1

2007-07-31 Thread dsh at gcc dot gnu dot org
[test]$ cat bar.c
#include 
const char s[1] = "s";
int
main (void)
{
  printf (s);
  return 0;
}
[test]$ gcc-svn -v
Using built-in specs.
Target: i686-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../gcc.orig/configure --prefix=/home/dsh --program-suffix=-svn
--build=i686-linux-gnu --enable-languages=all
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.3.0 20070731 (experimental)
[test]$ gcc-svn -std=gnu99 -Wformat=2 bar.c
bar.c: In function 'main':
bar.c:6: warning: zero-length printf format string

The format string is not zero-length, it's unterminated.  The fix is simple. 
I've got a patch and will send it in shortly.


-- 
   Summary: -Wformat warns incorrectly on an unterminated format
string of length 1
   Product: gcc
   Version: 4.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
  Severity: normal
  Priority: P3
 Component: c
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: dsh at gcc dot gnu dot org


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32953



[Bug c/32953] -Wformat warns incorrectly on an unterminated format string of length 1

2007-08-13 Thread dsh at gcc dot gnu dot org


--- Comment #1 from dsh at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-08-13 21:55 ---
Subject: Bug 32953

Author: dsh
Date: Mon Aug 13 21:55:01 2007
New Revision: 127399

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=127399
Log:
gcc/
2007-08-3 1 Dan Hipschman  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

PR 32953
* c-format.c (check_format_arg): Move check for zero-length
format strings below the check for unterminated strings.

testsuite/
2007-08-13  Dan Hipschman  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

PR 32953
* gcc.dg/format/array-1.c: Add an additional test for
unterminated format strings of length 1.


Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/c-format.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/format/array-1.c


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32953



[Bug c/32953] -Wformat warns incorrectly on an unterminated format string of length 1

2007-08-13 Thread dsh at gcc dot gnu dot org


--- Comment #2 from dsh at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-08-13 22:09 ---
Fixed.


-- 

dsh at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32953



[Bug c/32528] -save-temps when compiling standard input fails

2007-11-12 Thread dsh at gcc dot gnu dot org


--- Comment #2 from dsh at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-11-13 04:46 ---
Created an attachment (id=14537)
 --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14537&action=view)
Idea for a fix

I started on a patch for this a few months ago.  It basically just prepended ./
to all the temporary file names.  Attached.  I doubt it will still apply right
off the bat, but just take it as an idea for a fix.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32528



[Bug c/32528] -save-temps when compiling standard input fails

2007-11-12 Thread dsh at gcc dot gnu dot org


--- Comment #3 from dsh at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-11-13 04:50 ---
Created an attachment (id=14538)
 --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14538&action=view)
Better patch

Sorry, this one's cleaner.  That other one included some other cleanup that I
think already went in.


-- 

dsh at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Attachment #14537|0   |1
is obsolete||


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32528



[Bug target/19923] [4.0/4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] openssl is slower when compiled with gcc 4.0 than 3.3

2007-11-28 Thread dsh at gcc dot gnu dot org


--- Comment #42 from dsh at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-11-28 17:19 ---
Created an attachment (id=14656)
 --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14656&action=view)
Benchmarks

I ran the benchmarks for the minimal testcase (using Dan Kegel's script) on a
Core 2 Duo, AMD Dual Core Opteron, and a Pentium 3 using GCC 2.95.3, 3.4.3,
4.0.1, and 4.3.0 from svn.  I'm still looking for a Pentium 4 to test on.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19923