[Bug c++/57850] Option -fdump-translation-unit not working

2013-08-04 Thread dmitrij.ledkov at ubuntu dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57850

--- Comment #5 from Dima  ---
Why is this bug is still marked unconfirmed? Is there something I can do to
confirm it?


[Bug c++/57850] [4.8/4.9 Regression] Option -fdump-translation-unit not working

2013-09-20 Thread dmitrij.ledkov at ubuntu dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57850

--- Comment #11 from Dima  ---
(In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #9)
> Created attachment 30818 [details]
> patch
> 
> Can you verify that this patch fixes the issue?

Yes, it works for me and makes abi-compliance-checker function once again.

Regards,

Dmitrijs.


[Bug c++/57850] [4.8/4.9 Regression] Option -fdump-translation-unit not working

2013-10-08 Thread dmitrij.ledkov at ubuntu dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57850

--- Comment #12 from Dima  ---
Is this going to be applied for 4.9 & 4.8 series?


[Bug libgcj/40868] ecjx.cc should be compiled by host gcc

2010-09-27 Thread dmitrij.ledkov at ubuntu dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40868

--- Comment #16 from Dima  2010-09-27 
22:13:18 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #15)
> (In reply to comment #14)
> > Created attachment 21898 [details] [details]
> > backport
> > 
> > This is the backport I use against gcc-4.4
> 
> dear dima, thanks for that patch but it's not sufficient. it even applies and
> configures right but too many things had changed between release 4.4.4 and
> revision 163580. so the resulting generated makefile is faulty and leaves the
> variable @GCC_FOR_ECJX@ unsubtituted which causes compile to fail.

This patch does apply against snapshot gcc-4.4 branch 26-09-2010. And does
build libgcj & java cross-compiler from i386|x86_64-gnu-linux to
i686-w64-mingw32.
After the patch is applied you do need to rerun correct autoreconf (2.59).

Buildlog -
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/56490712/buildlog_ubuntu-lucid-i386.w64-toolchain_1.0b%2B201009260029-0w2228g93841b22110p11~lucid1_FULLYBUILT.txt.gz


[Bug bootstrap/41337] [LTO] Parallel build failure

2010-11-16 Thread dmitrij.ledkov at ubuntu dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41337

Dima  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||dmitrij.ledkov at ubuntu
   ||dot com

--- Comment #2 from Dima  2010-11-16 21:53:42 
UTC ---
I have the same error. Would please share your pilot error and how you have
fixed it? Maybe I'm doing the same thing


[Bug bootstrap/41337] [LTO] Parallel build failure

2010-11-17 Thread dmitrij.ledkov at ubuntu dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41337

--- Comment #4 from Dima  2010-11-17 21:02:58 
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> If you encounter parallel build failures, please post exact revision that was
> built, configure command line, build system type, number of processors on the
> box, N argument in 'make -jN', and ideally also the likelihood (in precent)
> that the build fails, if it is not deterministic.  Please also post the last
> 300 or so lines of build output, and maybe check whether it always fails in 
> the
> same spot.
> 

I'm building a cross-compiler: build/host = gnu-linux; target =
i686-w64-mingw32. I've been using gcc-4.4 branch this whole week (will test
again with trunk when I have time). It is fully deterministic (100% fail rate
at the same spot) when I supply --with-build-libsubdir pointing to the
$prefix/$target-triplet/lib. But the mentioned value for --with-build-libsubdir
option is bogus and doesn't make sense.

> It is not too hard to pinpoint parallel build failures but only if there is
> enough data available.

I no longer believe my error was to do with parallel make, it was the error
between the keyboard and the chair =) in other words "pilot error".

If someone else will come across with

> make[1]: *** No rule to make target `build/gencondmd', needed by `s-condmd'

Check your config and make sure it is sane =)