[Bug libstdc++/39237] New: Overloaded Operator delete not called

[caroline dot rioux at ca dot ibm dot com]

../lib64
-L/isv/gnu/bin/../lib/gcc-lib/x86_64-redhat-linux/3.2.3/../../..
-L/usr/lib/gcc-lib/x86_64-redhat-linux/3.2.3/../../../../lib64
-L/usr/lib/gcc-lib/x86_64-redhat-linux/3.2.3/../../.. -L/lib/../lib64
-L/usr/lib/../lib64 simple_vector.o -lstdc++ -lm -lgcc_s -lgcc -lc -lgcc_s
-lgcc /isv/gnu/bin/../lib/gcc-lib/x86_64-redhat-linux/3.2.3/crtend.o
/isv/gnu/bin/../lib/gcc-lib/x86_64-redhat-linux/3.2.3/../../../../lib64/crtn.o


-- 
   Summary: Overloaded Operator delete not called
   Product: gcc
           Version: 3.2.3
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
  Severity: normal
  Priority: P3
 Component: libstdc++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: caroline dot rioux at ca dot ibm dot com


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39237

[Bug libstdc++/39237] Overloaded Operator delete not called

[caroline dot rioux at ca dot ibm dot com]

--- Comment #1 from caroline dot rioux at ca dot ibm dot com  2009-02-18 
21:39 ---
Created an attachment (id=17327)
 --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17327&action=view)
Preprocessed source


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39237

[Bug libstdc++/39237] Overloaded Operator delete not called

[caroline dot rioux at ca dot ibm dot com]

--- Comment #3 from caroline dot rioux at ca dot ibm dot com  2009-02-18 
22:02 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Fixed in 4.1.0 as mentioned already.  3.3.x is no longer maintained and any 
> bug
> that is reported against that old version is most likely not going to be ever
> fixed.
> 

Ok thanks for your input. Was this explicitly fixed or a result of other
framework changes?  Is there any way a patch exists and could be applied?

I ask because it is unlikely we will move to gcc4 in the short term. Is
gcc3.4.x still supported? Because it also occurs there.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39237

[Bug libstdc++/39237] Overloaded Operator delete not called

[caroline dot rioux at ca dot ibm dot com]

--- Comment #5 from caroline dot rioux at ca dot ibm dot com  2009-02-18 
22:15 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Nope, only currently 4.2 and above are being maintained.  Is there a reason 
> why
> you unlikely to move to 4.x in the short term? 

We have a big code base and changing compilers is done seldom and very
carefully.  This bug will be one more reason to move though, so that's good :)

Is there any way you would know exactly what the bug is in this case? Is it a
leak, or that the memory is not free'd through delete, or that the overloaded
operator is not called when it should?  I searched the bug database but
couldn't find anything similar. 

Thanks again!


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39237