[Bug target/36904] [4.4 Regression] vector context sensitive keyword vs macros

[bje at au1 dot ibm dot com]

--- Comment #2 from bje at au1 dot ibm dot com  2008-08-26 12:29 ---
Subject: Re:  [4.4 Regression] vector context sensitive
keyword vs macros

> Partial fix, which fixes the testcase from this PR, but still other cases
> in the made up testcase fail and I don't know if they are meant to
> work or not.

If it does not make things worse, should we apply this patch?

Ben


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36904

[Bug libstdc++/19495] basic_string::_M_rep() can produce an unnaturally aligned pointer to _Rep

[bje at au1 dot ibm dot com]

--- Additional Comments From bje at au1 dot ibm dot com  2005-01-19 06:05 
---
Subject: Re:  basic_string::_M_rep() can produce an unnaturally aligned pointer 
to _Rep

On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 09:45:48AM -, pcarlini at suse dot de wrote:

> In other terms, as far as this PR is concerned, basic_string seems
> ok, just you cannot create a basic_string object in memory
> aligned one, as happens in ext/array_allocator/2.cc, which therefore
> should be fixed.

Does this behaviour seem a little bit unusual to you?  You said: "You
cannot create a basic_string object in memory aligned one".
That is rather counter-intuitive to a user of libstdc++ who has no
understanding of the implementation details of basic_string.

Ben


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19495