[Bug c/24863] New: New __attribute__((alias("target"))) requirement break aliasing assembler functions

2005-11-14 Thread arnold-j at t-online dot de
The new requirement for (weak) symbol aliasing:


Given __attribute__((alias("target"))) it is now an error if target is not a
symbol, defined in the same translation unit. This also applies to aliases
created by #pragma weak alias=target. This is because it's meaningless to
define
an alias to an undefined symbol. On Solaris, the native assembler would have
caught this error, but GNU as does not.


breaks compilation of code like this (example from an sh-elf target, but the
effect is architecture-independent):


extern __attribute__((weak,alias("UIE11"))) void NMI(void);
void UIE11 (void);

asm(
"_UIE11:[EMAIL PROTECTED],r4\t\n"
);


which is perfectly valid and worked in all of gcc 3.0.x, gcc 3.3.x and gcc
3.4.x


-- 
   Summary: New __attribute__((alias("target"))) requirement break
aliasing assembler functions
   Product: gcc
   Version: 4.0.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
  Severity: normal
  Priority: P3
 Component: c
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
    ReportedBy: arnold-j at t-online dot de


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24863



[Bug c/24863] New __attribute__((alias("target"))) requirement break aliasing assembler functions

2005-11-14 Thread arnold-j at t-online dot de


-- 

arnold-j at t-online dot de changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Severity|normal  |major
 GCC target triplet||all
   Keywords||rejects-valid


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24863



[Bug c/24863] New __attribute__((alias("target"))) requirement break aliasing assembler functions

2005-11-14 Thread arnold-j at t-online dot de


--- Comment #2 from arnold-j at t-online dot de  2005-11-14 22:55 ---
I am indeed hiding a lot of code, but hopefully in order to pinpoint the issue.
This code snippet is taken from the rockbox project http://www.rockbox.org/ ,
precisely from 
http://www.rockbox.org/viewcvs.cgi/firmware/system.c?annotate=1.73
Check lines 652-1019.

This is part of the exception handling on the SH1 target CPU. All exceptions
are
handled in one C handler function, UIE(). However, the only way to get the
exception number on SH1 is checking the called handler address, so all
exceptions that aren't handled by other code are handled by tiny assembler
snippets which just fetch their callee address and pass it to UIE(), which then
checks the address it was called from.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24863



[Bug c/24863] New __attribute__((alias("target"))) requirement break aliasing assembler functions

2005-11-14 Thread arnold-j at t-online dot de


--- Comment #4 from arnold-j at t-online dot de  2005-11-14 23:16 ---
How do you mean, it seems like a hack? Obviously we can't put the asm in a
different file, because then the symbols would clearly be defined in a
different translation unit. As-is they are not, but gcc 4.0.x errors because it
doesn't see the symbols in the inline asm.

There are two main points which require the code to work like it does:

(1) As mentioned, the exception number can only be derived from the called
address. UIE() is there to catch all unexpected interrupts and exceptions, i.e.
those for which there are no specific handlers. That's why all _UIE##number
symbols are defined in the asm block, in a regular structure that allows to
compute the vector number from the called address easily.

(2) We need to weak-alias these asm symbols because they should only be used
when there is no dedicated handler for the specific interrupt or exception
defined in any other source file. Perhaps it would be possible to hard code
which handlers are implemented elsewhere and which are not, but that would be
rather hard to maintain.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24863



[Bug middle-end/23442] Compiler fails to build - internal compiler error: in do_SUBST, at combine.c:462

2006-03-21 Thread arnold-j at t-online dot de


--- Comment #2 from arnold-j at t-online dot de  2006-03-21 21:11 ---
This happens with *all* versions of m68k-elf-gcc I tried to build (3.3.6,
3.4.5, 3.4.6, 4.0.2, 4.0.3).

Host gcc:
gcc version 4.0.3 20060212 (prerelease) (Debian 4.0.2-9)

Example: m68k-elf-gcc 3.4.6, configured with: 
../../gcc-3.4.6/configure --target=m68k-elf --prefix=/opt/m68k
--enable-languages=c

Result:
/home/jens/build/gcc/gcc/xgcc -B/home/jens/build/gcc/gcc/
-B/opt/m68k/m68k-elf/bin/ -B/opt/m68k/m68k-elf/lib/ -isystem
/opt/m68k/m68k-elf/include -isystem /opt/m68k/m68k-elf/sys-include -O2 
-DIN_GCC -DCROSS_COMPILE   -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes
-Wmissing-prototypes -Wold-style-definition  -isystem ./include   -g 
-DIN_LIBGCC2 -D__GCC_FLOAT_NOT_NEEDED -Dinhibit_libc -I. -I.
-I../../../gcc-3.4.6/gcc -I../../../gcc-3.4.6/gcc/.
-I../../../gcc-3.4.6/gcc/../include   -m68000 -DL_fixdfdi -c
../../../gcc-3.4.6/gcc/libgcc2.c -o libgcc/m68000/_fixdfdi.o
../../../gcc-3.4.6/gcc/libgcc2.c: In function `__fixdfdi':
../../../gcc-3.4.6/gcc/libgcc2.c:1277: internal compiler error: in do_SUBST, at
combine.c:447
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
See http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.
make[2]: *** [libgcc/m68000/_fixdfdi.o] Fehler 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/jens/build/gcc/gcc'
make[1]: *** [stmp-multilib] Fehler 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/jens/build/gcc/gcc'
make: *** [all-gcc] Fehler 2

The line numbers vary with gcc versions, but it's always an ICE of xgcc in
do_SUBST (combine.c), trying to compile _fixdfdi (libgcc2.c)


-- 

arnold-j at t-online dot de changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC|                |arnold-j at t-online dot de


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23442



[Bug middle-end/23442] Compiler fails to build - internal compiler error: in do_SUBST, at combine.c:462

2006-03-21 Thread arnold-j at t-online dot de


--- Comment #3 from arnold-j at t-online dot de  2006-03-21 21:30 ---
Created an attachment (id=11085)
 --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11085&action=view)
The preprocessed source file causing the error


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23442