[Bug ada/51035] New: GNAT bug detected error reported when compiling Ada code

2011-11-08 Thread aravindvijayan224185 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51035

 Bug #: 51035
   Summary: GNAT bug detected error reported when compiling Ada
code
Classification: Unclassified
   Product: gcc
   Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
  Severity: normal
  Priority: P3
 Component: ada
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: aravindvijayan224...@gmail.com


Created attachment 25754
  --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25754
The source code

When compiling a test program written in Ada using 4.6.1 20110908 (Red Hat
4.6.1-9) (i686-redhat-linux-gnu) (package gcc-gnat-4.6.1-9.fc15.i686), I see
the following error message:



[aravind@localhost ada]$ gnatmake  test.adb 
gcc -c test.adb
+===GNAT BUG DETECTED==+
| 4.6.1 20110908 (Red Hat 4.6.1-9) (i686-redhat-linux-gnu) Assert_Failure
sinfo.adb:2547|
| Error detected at test.adb:5:4   |
| Please submit a bug report; see http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html.|
| Use a subject line meaningful to you and us to track the bug.|
| Include the entire contents of this bug box in the report.   |
| Include the exact gcc or gnatmake command that you entered.  |
| Also include sources listed below in gnatchop format |
| (concatenated together with no headers between files).   |
+==+

Please include these source files with error report
Note that list may not be accurate in some cases,
so please double check that the problem can still
be reproduced with the set of files listed.
Consider also -gnatd.n switch (see debug.adb).

test.adb

test.adb:5:39: extra ")" ignored
compilation abandoned
gnatmake: "test.adb" compilation error



---
The ada program text consists of the following lines:

--begin program
with Ada.Text_IO;

procedure Test is
   subtype X is Integer range (1 .. 25);
   Y: Integer range X'First .. X'Last := X'First;
begin
   Ada.Text_IO.Put("Hello World");
end Test;

-- end program


The error lies with the line which reads:

   subtype X is Integer range (1 .. 25);

The brackets around the 1 .. 25 are wrong. Once removed, the error goes away.

However, the compiler should report a nice error message and not report that a
bug in the compiler has been found.

--

here is the "gcc -v" output:

[aravind@localhost ada]$ gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=/usr/bin/gcc
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/libexec/gcc/i686-redhat-linux/4.6.1/lto-wrapper
Target: i686-redhat-linux
Configured with: ../configure --prefix=/usr --mandir=/usr/share/man
--infodir=/usr/share/info --with-bugurl=http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla
--enable-bootstrap --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix
--enable-checking=release --with-system-zlib --enable-__cxa_atexit
--disable-libunwind-exceptions --enable-gnu-unique-object
--enable-linker-build-id
--enable-languages=c,c++,objc,obj-c++,java,fortran,ada,go,lto --enable-plugin
--enable-java-awt=gtk --disable-dssi
--with-java-home=/usr/lib/jvm/java-1.5.0-gcj-1.5.0.0/jre
--enable-libgcj-multifile --enable-java-maintainer-mode
--with-ecj-jar=/usr/share/java/eclipse-ecj.jar --disable-libjava-multilib
--with-ppl --with-cloog --with-tune=generic --with-arch=i686
--build=i686-redhat-linux
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.6.1 20110908 (Red Hat 4.6.1-9) (GCC) 

--

expected behavior:

Just a compiler error due to syntax error

actual behavior:

A bug box even that is only a syntax error

---


[Bug c/51894] New: Fail to warn on likely precedence error in conditional

2012-01-18 Thread aravindvijayan224185 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51894

 Bug #: 51894
   Summary: Fail to warn on likely precedence error in conditional
Classification: Unclassified
   Product: gcc
   Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
  Severity: minor
  Priority: P3
 Component: c
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: aravindvijayan224...@gmail.com


Created attachment 26371
  --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26371
example program showing the failure to warn

example program showing the failure to warn:

gcc version 4.7.0

If you have:

if (ret = return_neg_one() == 1)
 printf("direct_test==true\n");
else
 printf("direct_test==false\n");

The compiler will warn:
/tmp/tmp.c:51:2: warning: suggest parentheses around assignment used as truth
value

But if it is a complex conditional:
if (!cond ||
(ret = return_neg_one() == 1))

The compiler will not warn.  It seems it should warn in this case as well.


[Bug fortran/52063] New: internal compiler error: in gfc_conv_variable, at fortran/trans-expr.c:1080

2012-01-30 Thread aravindvijayan224185 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52063

 Bug #: 52063
   Summary: internal compiler error: in gfc_conv_variable, at
fortran/trans-expr.c:1080
Classification: Unclassified
   Product: gcc
   Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
  Severity: normal
  Priority: P3
 Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: aravindvijayan224...@gmail.com


Created attachment 26526
  --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26526
Preprocessed Source

Description of problem:

While building plplot :

cd /builddir/build/BUILD/plplot-5.9.9/fedora/examples/f95 && /usr/bin/gfortran 
 -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector
--param=ssp-buffer-size=4  -m32 -march=i686 -mtune=atom
-fasynchronous-unwind-tables 
-I/builddir/build/BUILD/plplot-5.9.9/fedora/bindings/f95
-I/builddir/build/BUILD/plplot-5.9.9/fedora/examples/f95-c
/builddir/build/BUILD/plplot-5.9.9/examples/f95/x09f.f90 -o
CMakeFiles/x09f95.dir/x09f.f90.o
/builddir/build/BUILD/plplot-5.9.9/examples/f95/x09f.f90:152.22:
lev(NLEVEL), t, r, theta, delta
  1
Warning: Unused variable 't' declared at (1)
/builddir/build/BUILD/plplot-5.9.9/examples/f95/x09f.f90: In function 'x09f95':
/builddir/build/BUILD/plplot-5.9.9/examples/f95/x09f.f90:66:0: internal
compiler error: in gfc_conv_variable, at fortran/trans-expr.c:1080


[Bug fortran/52063] internal compiler error: in gfc_conv_variable, at fortran/trans-expr.c:1080

2012-01-30 Thread aravindvijayan224185 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52063

--- Comment #1 from Aravind  2012-01-31 
03:35:48 UTC ---
Created attachment 26527
  --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26527
plf95demolib.mod


[Bug fortran/52063] internal compiler error: in gfc_conv_variable, at fortran/trans-expr.c:1080

2012-01-30 Thread aravindvijayan224185 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52063

--- Comment #2 from Aravind  2012-01-31 
03:36:41 UTC ---
Created attachment 26528
  --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26528
plplot.mod


[Bug fortran/52063] internal compiler error: in gfc_conv_variable, at fortran/trans-expr.c:1080

2012-01-30 Thread aravindvijayan224185 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52063

--- Comment #3 from Aravind  2012-01-31 
03:37:18 UTC ---
Compiles fine with 4.6.2-1.fc16


[Bug fortran/52063] internal compiler error: in gfc_conv_variable, at fortran/trans-expr.c:1080

2012-01-30 Thread aravindvijayan224185 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52063

--- Comment #4 from Aravind  2012-01-31 
03:38:01 UTC ---
Narrowed down to:
program x09f95
use plf95demolib
integer, parameter :: nptsx=35, xdim=99
real(kind=8)   :: xg1(xdim), distort
xg1 = foo (arange(0,nptsx) / dble(nptsx-1), distort)
contains
elemental real(kind=8) function foo( coord, factor )
real(kind=8), intent(in) :: coord, factor
foo = 1
end function foo
end program x09f95


[Bug fortran/52063] internal compiler error: in gfc_conv_variable, at fortran/trans-expr.c:1080

2012-01-30 Thread aravindvijayan224185 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52063

--- Comment #5 from Aravind  2012-01-31 
03:39:00 UTC ---
Created attachment 26529
  --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26529
plf95demolib.f90


[Bug fortran/52063] internal compiler error: in gfc_conv_variable, at fortran/trans-expr.c:1080

2012-01-30 Thread aravindvijayan224185 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52063

--- Comment #6 from Aravind  2012-01-31 
03:40:30 UTC ---
Created attachment 26530
  --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26530
the full build log.


[Bug fortran/52063] internal compiler error: in gfc_conv_variable, at fortran/trans-expr.c:1080

2012-01-30 Thread aravindvijayan224185 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52063

--- Comment #8 from Aravind  2012-01-31 
03:45:10 UTC ---
Oh i am sorry